BN vs OAK-PA vs TPG Stock Comparison

Brookfield, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings and Tpg Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BN BROOKFIELD Corp /ON/
$39.49 +8.2% 1M -15.2% 1Y
Market cap
$88.75B
P/E
70.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$76.56B
Div. yield
0.68%
Alternative Asset Managers Financial Services
3 wins
TPG TPG Inc.
$47.94 +10.2% 1M -14.7% 1Y
Market cap
$18.74B
P/E
33.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.18B
Div. yield
4.67%
Alternative Asset Managers Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Brookfield Oaktree Holdings leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Brookfield Oaktree Holdings 4, Brookfield 3, Tpg 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBNOAK-PATPGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $88.75B $3.13B $18.74B BN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 70.6x 7.7x 33.4x OAK-PA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.2x — 18.3x BN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -9.6% -2.3% +33.2% TPG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.6% 48.6% 4.6% OAK-PA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 13.1% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 1.3x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.68% 0.00% 4.67% TPG
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -15.2% -12.6% -14.7% OAK-PA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.9%/yr -6.2%/yr — BN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 27.7% 14.6% 40.8% OAK-PA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 39/100 42/100 72/100 TPG

Percentile Scorecard

BNOAK-PATPG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBNOAK-PATPG
Valuation 76 #44 of 181 36 #116 of 181 68 #59 of 181
Growth 35 #72 of 110 60 #45 of 110 88 #14 of 110
Profitability 31 #88 of 127 51 #63 of 127 67 #43 of 127
Financial Health 39 #100 of 162 45 #89 of 162 48 #84 of 162
Shareholder Returns 15 #65 of 76 16 #64 of 76 91 #8 of 76
Overall 39 42 72
  • BN ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • OAK-PA ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • TPG ranked among 209 companies in Asset and Wealth Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBNOAK-PATPGSPY
1 month +8.2%-3.8%+10.2% +0.7%
3 months -6.0%-6.9%+12.3% +3.7%
6 months -12.5%-6.4%+9.9% +7.1%
Year to date -13.9%-7.0%-24.9% +12.8%
1 year -15.2%-12.6%-14.7% +11.9%
3 years +103.2%+1.9%+73.4% +85.2%
3 years, per year +26.7%+0.6%+20.2% +22.8%
5 years +21.3%-27.2%— +67.6%
5 years, per year +3.9%-6.2%— +10.9%
10 years +216.7%—— +262.0%
10 years, per year +12.2%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBNOAK-PATPGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 27.7%14.6%40.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 29.0%16.5%42.2% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.360.201.45 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.55-0.86-0.36 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -42.5%-28.7%-46.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.7%-12.6%-31.2% -1.2%
52-week high $49.17$22.31$69.66 $779.14
52-week low $35.94$19.51$37.93 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBNOAK-PATPG
P/E now vs peer median 70.6xmedian 33.5x 7.7xmedian 33.5x 33.4xmedian 33.5x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 4.9x 5.1xmedian 4.9x 3.6xmedian 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.0x —median 12.0x 19.3xmedian 12.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 14.3x -13.4xmedian 14.3x 20.4xmedian 14.3x
P/B now vs peer median 21.7xmedian 1.8x 1.5xmedian 1.8x 5.0xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median -0.74median 0.97 0.34median 0.97 1.79median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBNOAK-PATPG
Revenue $76.56B $617.93M $5.18B
Net income $3.71B $716.53M $678.04M
Free cash flow – -$233.55M $917.48M
EPS (diluted) $0.53 $2.53 $0.61
Cash & equivalents $14.89B $255.46M $944.66M
Total debt $59.07B $4.99B $2.34B
Shares (diluted) 2.37B 118.83M 385.47M
Enterprise value -$94.33B $2.09B $17.54B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBNOAK-PATPG
P/E 70.6x 7.7x 33.4x
P/FCF – -13.4x 20.4x
P/Operating cash flow – -13.4x 19.3x
P/S 1.2x 5.1x 3.6x
P/B 21.7x 1.5x 5.0x
P/Tangible book -2.7x 1.5x 5.9x
EV/EBITDA – – 19.3x
EV/EBIT – – 22.9x
EV/Revenue 0.7x 7.1x 3.9x
EV/FCF – -18.7x 22.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – -18.7x 20.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.74 0.34 1.79

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBNOAK-PATPG
Revenue growth (1Y) -9.6% -2.3% 33.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -4.2% -14.4% 32.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 28.4% 44.9% 530.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 11.2% 9.2% 81.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 65.8% 140.7% 264.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -95.3% 22.7% 18.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -130.2% 109.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 43.7% -7.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -130.2% 106.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 43.7% -8.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBNOAK-PATPG
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – 20.2%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – – 14.5%
Net margin 1.6% 48.6% 4.6%
FCF margin – -37.8% 17.7%
Operating cash flow margin – -37.8% 18.8%
Return on equity 4.3% 32.5% 18.2%
Return on assets 0.7% 10.0% 5.0%
Return on invested capital – – 13.1%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.1x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – -0.3x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue – – 17.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBNOAK-PATPG
Debt / assets 2.8% 21.2% 16.7%
Debt / equity 3.6x 0.7x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 1.3x
Debt / FCF – -6.4x 2.6x
Liabilities / assets 99.2% 70.9% 73.3%
Equity / assets 0.8% 29.1% 26.7%
Interest coverage – – 6.7x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBNOAK-PATPG
Dividend yield 0.7% 0.0% 4.7%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.7% 0.0% 4.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 22.5% 4.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) – -68.9% 3.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – -68.0% 210.9%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBNOAK-PATPG
Forward P/E 14.2xFY2026 – 18.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.78FY2026 – $2.62FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +23.6%FY2026 – +8.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.6% – +29.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.00BFY2026 – $2.53BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.4%FY2026 – +19.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +21.1% – +18.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBNOAK-PATPG
Held by institutions 66.5% – 37.5%
Institutions holding 931 – 372
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.2% – +10.1%
Institutions buying 408 – 217
Institutions selling 317 – 120
Buyers to sellers 1.29 – 1.81

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BNOAK-PATPG
BN 1.00 0.16 0.67
OAK-PA 0.16 1.00 0.11
TPG 0.67 0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BN, OAK-PA and TPG?

Brookfield (BN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brookfield (BN) $88.75B, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) $3.13B, Tpg (TPG) $18.74B.

Which stock is cheaper, BN, OAK-PA and TPG?

Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Brookfield (BN) 70.6x, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) 7.7x, Tpg (TPG) 33.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Brookfield (BN) is cheapest (Brookfield (BN) 14.2x, Tpg (TPG) 18.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Tpg (TPG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Brookfield (BN) -9.6%, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) -2.3%, Tpg (TPG) +33.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) has the highest net margin (Brookfield (BN) 1.6%, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) 48.6%, Tpg (TPG) 4.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) returned the most: Brookfield (BN) -15.2%, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) -12.6%, Tpg (TPG) -14.7%. Over five years, Brookfield (BN) compounded fastest (Brookfield (BN) +3.9%/yr, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) -6.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Tpg (TPG) has the highest dividend yield: Brookfield (BN) 0.68%, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) 0.00%, Tpg (TPG) 4.67%. Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) has been the steadiest (Brookfield (BN) 27.7%, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) 14.6%, Tpg (TPG) 40.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BN, OAK-PA and TPG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Brookfield Oaktree Holdings (OAK-PA) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.