BMY vs NVS vs RGC Stock Comparison

Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis Ag and Regencell Bioscience Holdings Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BMY Bristol Myers Squibb Co
$60.61 -5.1% 1M +41.5% 1Y
Market cap
$124.80B
P/E
13.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$49.19B
Div. yield
–
Pharmaceuticals Healthcare
3 wins
NVS Novartis Ag
$156.09 +6.2% 1M +26.5% 1Y
Market cap
$312.26B
P/E
17.9x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Pharmaceuticals Healthcare
2 wins

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

Bristol Myers Squibb leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Bristol Myers Squibb 3, Novartis Ag 2, Regencell Bioscience Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBMYNVSRGCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $124.80B $312.26B $3.38B NVS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 13.4x 17.9x -307.3x BMY
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.1x 16.9x — BMY
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.1% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 18.9% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -3.3% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 78.9x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +41.5% +26.5% -57.9% BMY
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +0.7%/yr +13.5%/yr +83.2%/yr RGC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 28.4% 27.5% 142.6% NVS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

BMYNVSRGC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBMYNVSRGC
Valuation 86 #88 of 625 97 #19 of 625 38 #390 of 625
Growth 53 #286 of 602 – –
Profitability 87 #71 of 549 – –
Financial Health 16 #552 of 654 – 90 #67 of 654
Shareholder Returns 88 #44 of 367 82 #67 of 367 –
Overall 66 – –
  • BMY ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • NVS ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • RGC ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBMYNVSRGCSPY
1 month -5.1%+6.2%+17.3% +0.9%
3 months -4.0%-1.7%+28.7% +5.9%
6 months +5.2%+9.2%-74.9% +8.5%
Year to date +12.4%+13.2%-65.4% +13.3%
1 year +41.5%+26.5%-57.9% +12.4%
3 years +18.8%+69.2%+1,595.0% +88.1%
3 years, per year +5.9%+19.2%+157.0% +23.5%
5 years +3.8%+88.6%+1,957.2% +68.2%
5 years, per year +0.7%+13.5%+83.2% +11.0%
10 years +18.8%+119.6%— +263.4%
10 years, per year +1.7%+8.2%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureBMYNVSRGCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 28.4%27.5%142.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 25.5%30.0%134.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.200.351.49 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.460.96-0.41 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.1%-20.4%-93.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.0%-7.4%-86.3% -0.9%
52-week high $68.09$168.62$52.88 $779.14
52-week low $42.60$121.80$4.78 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBMYNVSRGC
P/E now vs peer median 13.3xmedian 17.4x 17.9xmedian 17.4x -307.3xmedian 17.4x
P/S now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 9.1x 5.1xmedian 9.1x —median 9.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 383.9xmedian 17.1x —median 17.1x —median 17.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.8xmedian 19.0x 14.3xmedian 19.0x -468.5xmedian 19.0x
P/B now vs peer median 5.5xmedian 2.2x —median 2.2x 270.1xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 2.17median 0.34 —median 0.34 —median 0.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBMYNVSRGC
Revenue $49.19B – –
Gross profit $34.51B – –
Operating income -$2.77B – –
Net income $9.28B – –
Free cash flow $11.44B – –
R&D $10.72B – –
EPS (diluted) $4.53 – –
Cash & equivalents $8.72B $400.00M $14.19M
Total debt $43.12B – $21.88K
Shares (diluted) 2.05B 1.96B 494.60M
Enterprise value $76.07B $285.49B $3.35B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBMYNVSRGC
P/E 13.3x 17.9x -307.3x
P/FCF 10.8x 14.3x -468.5x
P/Operating cash flow 9.7x – –
P/S 2.5x 5.1x –
P/B 5.5x – 270.1x
P/Tangible book 25.1x – 270.1x
EV/EBITDA 383.9x – –
EV/EBIT -56.3x – –
EV/Revenue 3.2x – –
EV/FCF 13.6x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 12.2x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.17 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBMYNVSRGC
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.1% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 2.9% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 2.9% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -0.3% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 63.5% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -17.9% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 83.3% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 5.2% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 82.9% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 6.2% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -19.6% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 2.6% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -21.5% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 2.2% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBMYNVSRGC
Gross margin 70.2% – –
EBITDA margin 0.8% – –
Operating margin -5.6% – –
Pretax margin 24.2% – –
Net margin 18.9% – –
FCF margin 23.3% – –
Operating cash flow margin 26.0% – –
Return on equity 43.7% – –
Return on assets 10.7% – –
Return on invested capital -3.3% – –
Return on capital employed -4.0% – –
Asset turnover 0.6x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x – –
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBMYNVSRGC
Debt / assets 49.2% – 0.1%
Debt / equity 1.9x – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 78.9x – –
Debt / FCF 3.8x – –
Liabilities / assets 74.5% – 9.4%
Equity / assets 25.5% – 90.6%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.5x – 10.8x
Quick ratio 1.2x – 10.7x
Cash ratio 0.6x – 10.7x
Altman Z-score 2.05 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBMYNVSRGC
Dividend yield 4.2% 3.0% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 4.2% 3.0% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBMYNVSRGC
Forward P/E 9.1xFY2026 16.9xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $6.63FY2026 $9.26FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +7.8%FY2026 +3.1%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after -3.9% +1.2% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $52.09BFY2026 $53.95BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +8.1%FY2026 -1.1%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after -9.3% +19.1% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBMYNVSRGC
Held by institutions 81.8% 7.0% 0.3%
Institutions holding 2,520 1,607 36
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.8% -5.9% +117.2%
Institutions buying 1,186 662 28
Institutions selling 986 560 5
Buyers to sellers 1.20 1.18 5.60

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BMYNVSRGC
BMY 1.00 0.52 0.11
NVS 0.52 1.00 0.06
RGC 0.11 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BMY, NVS and RGC?

Novartis Ag (NVS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bristol Myers Squibb (BMY) $124.80B, Novartis Ag (NVS) $312.26B, Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) $3.38B.

Which stock is cheaper, BMY, NVS and RGC?

Bristol Myers Squibb (BMY) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bristol Myers Squibb (BMY) 13.4x, Novartis Ag (NVS) 17.9x, Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) -307.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMY) is cheapest (Bristol Myers Squibb (BMY) 9.1x, Novartis Ag (NVS) 16.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bristol Myers Squibb (BMY) returned the most: Bristol Myers Squibb (BMY) +41.5%, Novartis Ag (NVS) +26.5%, Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) -57.9%. Over five years, Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) compounded fastest (Bristol Myers Squibb (BMY) +0.7%/yr, Novartis Ag (NVS) +13.5%/yr, Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) +83.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Novartis Ag (NVS) has been the steadiest (Bristol Myers Squibb (BMY) 28.4%, Novartis Ag (NVS) 27.5%, Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) 142.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BMY, NVS and RGC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMY) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.