BMNR vs KEEL vs HIVE Stock Comparison

Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Keel Infrastructure and HIVE Digital Technologies Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Keel Infrastructure leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Keel Infrastructure 4, Bitmine Immersion Technologies 3, HIVE Digital Technologies 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBMNRKEELHIVELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $11.09B $1.25B $499.22M BMNR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.3x -2.9x -1.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1,022.4% -1.9% +157.5% BMNR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -14,334.2% -230.6% -98.5% HIVE
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -31.0% -57.2% KEEL
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -5.3x 2.0x KEEL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -56.5% -45.8% -62.7% KEEL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -14.7%/yr -34.9%/yr KEEL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 89.5% 102.0% 92.5% BMNR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 28/100 15/100 37/100 HIVE

Percentile Scorecard

BMNRKEELHIVE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBMNRKEELHIVE
Valuation 15 #84 of 99 9 #90 of 99 54 #46 of 99
Growth 15 #80 of 94 12 #83 of 94 30 #66 of 94
Profitability 11 #80 of 90 18 #74 of 90 30 #63 of 90
Financial Health 99 #2 of 105 17 #87 of 105 63 #40 of 105
Shareholder Returns 0 #60 of 60 19 #49 of 60 10 #54 of 60
Overall 28 15 37
  • BMNR ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • KEEL ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • HIVE ranked among 109 companies in Fintech

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBMNRKEELHIVESPY
1 month -19.0%-35.5%-31.2% +0.7%
3 months +19.8%-43.0%-31.0% +3.7%
6 months +1.2%-23.8%-14.1% +7.1%
Year to date -20.2%-1.7%-19.8% +12.8%
1 year -56.5%-45.8%-62.7% +11.9%
3 years —+113.9%-29.8% +85.2%
3 years, per year —+28.9%-11.1% +22.8%
5 years —-54.9%-88.3% +67.6%
5 years, per year —-14.7%-34.9% +10.9%
10 years ——+1,970.0% +262.0%
10 years, per year ——+35.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBMNRKEELHIVESPY
Volatility, 1Y 89.5%102.0%92.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 88.3%100.4%88.7% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.854.173.59 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.63-0.45-0.68 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -90.1%-95.7%-94.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -56.5%-65.3%-62.7% -1.2%
52-week high $49.76$6.66$5.55 $779.14
52-week low $13.31$1.71$1.75 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBMNRKEELHIVE
P/E now vs peer median -1.4xmedian 19.5x -3.2xmedian 19.5x -1.7xmedian 19.5x
P/S now vs peer median 205.2xmedian 2.2x 7.6xmedian 2.2x 1.7xmedian 2.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -1.4xmedian 17.8x -12.6xmedian 17.8x -4.5xmedian 17.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median -42.6xmedian 16.1x -4.2xmedian 16.1x -5.6xmedian 16.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 2.0x 4.3xmedian 2.0x 1.3xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median 0.01median 0.98 1.53median 0.98 0.04median 0.98

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBMNRKEELHIVE
Revenue $61.19M $188.14M $331.30M
Gross profit $51.63M -$128.35M -$85.83M
Operating income -$8.88B -$364.52M -$289.12M
Net income -$8.75B -$433.84M -$326.37M
Free cash flow -$294.56M -$342.13M -$100.54M
EPS (diluted) $-19.76 $-0.72 $-1.23
Cash & equivalents $340.29M – $208.04M
Total debt – $1.03B $30.82M
Shares (diluted) 443.95M 605.37M 266.25M
Enterprise value $8.47B $1.25B $231.36M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBMNRKEELHIVE
P/E -1.4x -3.2x -1.7x
P/FCF -42.6x -4.2x -5.6x
P/Operating cash flow -42.8x -5.7x 10.1x
P/S 205.2x 7.6x 1.7x
P/B 1.1x 4.3x 1.3x
P/Tangible book 17.2x 7.3x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA -1.4x -12.6x -4.5x
EV/EBIT -1.4x -6.7x -1.4x
EV/Revenue 199.6x 13.0x 1.2x
EV/FCF -41.5x -7.2x -3.9x
EV/Operating cash flow -41.7x -9.8x 7.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.01 1.53 0.04

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBMNRKEELHIVE
Revenue growth (1Y) 1,022% -1.9% 157.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 409.8% 14.4% 19.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4,925% -692.0% -99.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 915.3% -131.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -303,259% -435.7% -343.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -1,575% -32.1% -54.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -245,329% -663.3% -748.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -1,536% -87.1% -27.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -507.2% -1,659% -569.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -189.0% -2.1% -45.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -18,616% 4.9% 79.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -465.8% -21.7% 6.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -18,922% 53.5% 15.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -369.4% 3.0% -77.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBMNRKEELHIVE
Gross margin 84.4% -68.2% -25.9%
EBITDA margin -14,504% -103.1% -26.3%
Operating margin -14,505% -193.7% -87.3%
Pretax margin -14,307% -199.2% -88.0%
Net margin -14,334% -230.6% -98.5%
FCF margin -481.4% -181.9% -30.3%
Operating cash flow margin -479.0% -133.1% 17.0%
Return on equity -81.6% -116.0% -73.6%
Return on assets -81.3% -35.0% -44.8%
Return on invested capital – -31.0% -57.2%
Return on capital employed -82.6% -30.7% -45.3%
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.2x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x 0.6x -0.2x
Stock comp / revenue 24.6% 11.0% 8.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBMNRKEELHIVE
Debt / assets – 72.5% 3.3%
Debt / equity – 3.1x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – -5.3x 2.0x
Debt / FCF – -3.0x -0.3x
Liabilities / assets 0.3% 76.8% 54.3%
Equity / assets 99.7% 23.2% 45.7%
Interest coverage – -22.6x -121.8x
Current ratio 36.7x 16.3x 2.0x
Quick ratio 28.0x – 1.6x
Cash ratio 28.0x – 1.5x
Altman Z-score 246.51 -0.03 -0.67

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBMNRKEELHIVE
Dividend yield 0.0% – –
Net buyback yield -99.3% -6.4% -28.0%
Shareholder yield -99.2% -6.4% -28.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBMNRKEELHIVE
EPS, next fiscal year $-22.41FY2026 $-0.50FY2026 $-0.87FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -267.4%FY2026 – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $127.50MFY2026 $95.91MFY2026 $388.53MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +1,990.2%FY2026 -58.2%FY2026 +30.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +380.0% -13.8% +29.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBMNRKEELHIVE
Held by institutions 42.5% 64.3% 40.3%
Institutions holding 439 283 191
Change in shares held, QoQ +24.4% +68.6% +41.2%
Institutions buying 277 283 132
Institutions selling 93 0 33
Buyers to sellers 2.98 – 4.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BMNRKEELHIVE
BMNR 1.00 0.55 0.57
KEEL 0.55 1.00 0.77
HIVE 0.57 0.77 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BMNR, KEEL and HIVE?

Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) $11.09B, Keel Infrastructure (KEEL) $1.25B, HIVE Digital Technologies (HIVE) $499.22M.

Which company is growing faster?

Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) +1,022.4%, Keel Infrastructure (KEEL) -1.9%, HIVE Digital Technologies (HIVE) +157.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

HIVE Digital Technologies (HIVE) has the highest net margin (Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) -14,334.2%, Keel Infrastructure (KEEL) -230.6%, HIVE Digital Technologies (HIVE) -98.5%). On return on invested capital, Keel Infrastructure (KEEL) leads (Keel Infrastructure (KEEL) -31.0%, HIVE Digital Technologies (HIVE) -57.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Keel Infrastructure (KEEL) returned the most: Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) -56.5%, Keel Infrastructure (KEEL) -45.8%, HIVE Digital Technologies (HIVE) -62.7%. Over five years, Keel Infrastructure (KEEL) compounded fastest (Keel Infrastructure (KEEL) -14.7%/yr, HIVE Digital Technologies (HIVE) -34.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) has been the steadiest (Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) 89.5%, Keel Infrastructure (KEEL) 102.0%, HIVE Digital Technologies (HIVE) 92.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BMNR, KEEL and HIVE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Keel Infrastructure (KEEL) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.