BMNR vs CLSK vs FUFU Stock Comparison

Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Cleanspark and Bitfufu Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CLSK Cleanspark, Inc.
$5.68 -53.8% 1M -65.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.59B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Crypto Mining Technology
1 win
FUFU Bitfufu Inc.
$0.90 -36.6% 1M -74.6% 1Y
Market cap
$148.21M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$399.51M
Div. yield
–
Crypto Mining Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Bitmine Immersion Technologies leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Bitmine Immersion Technologies 4, Bitfufu 3, Cleanspark 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBMNRCLSKFUFULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $10.21B $1.59B $148.21M BMNR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.2x -1.5x -1.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1,022.4% — +4.3% BMNR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -14,334.2% — -29.3% FUFU
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -32.9% 8.8% FUFU
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -3.6x 1.9x CLSK
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -54.2% -65.7% -74.6% BMNR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -22.6%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 89.4% 94.3% 105.6% BMNR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 36/100 35/100 53/100 FUFU

Percentile Scorecard

BMNRCLSKFUFU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBMNRCLSKFUFU
Valuation 16 #83 of 99 19 #80 of 99 88 #13 of 99
Growth 16 #79 of 94 2 #92 of 94 7 #88 of 94
Profitability 11 #80 of 90 17 #75 of 90 58 #38 of 90
Financial Health 99 #2 of 105 36 #68 of 105 58 #45 of 105
Shareholder Returns – 100 #1 of 62 –
Overall 36 35 53
  • BMNR ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • CLSK ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • FUFU ranked among 109 companies in Fintech

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBMNRCLSKFUFUSPY
1 month -27.6%-53.8%-36.6% -5.9%
3 months +3.5%-55.5%-30.2% -4.6%
6 months -13.7%-59.4%-60.5% +0.2%
Year to date -30.1%-43.9%-65.9% +7.5%
1 year -54.2%-65.7%-74.6% +8.2%
3 years —+31.8%-91.6% +68.3%
3 years, per year —+9.6%-56.3% +19.0%
5 years —-72.3%— +56.5%
5 years, per year —-22.6%— +9.4%

Risk

MeasureBMNRCLSKFUFUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 89.4%94.3%105.6% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 88.1%94.7%113.7% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.683.412.99 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.61-0.70-0.71 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -90.1%-92.0%-93.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -54.2%-69.8%-74.6% -5.9%
52-week high $41.42$18.81$3.54 $779.14
52-week low $13.31$5.68$0.90 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBMNRCLSKFUFU
P/E now vs peer median -1.2xmedian 22.5x -1.5xmedian 22.5x -1.3xmedian 22.5x
P/S now vs peer median 179.8xmedian 2.1x —median 2.1x 0.4xmedian 2.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -1.2xmedian 23.6x -6.8xmedian 23.6x 5.7xmedian 23.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -37.3xmedian 17.3x -2.4xmedian 17.3x —median 17.3x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 1.7x 1.9xmedian 1.7x 1.6xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.01median 0.64 0.02median 0.64 —median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBMNRCLSKFUFU
Revenue $61.19M – $399.51M
Gross profit $51.63M – $9.04M
Operating income -$8.88B -$893.80M $18.21M
Net income -$8.75B -$997.82M -$116.92M
Free cash flow -$294.56M -$620.00M –
R&D – – $2.74M
EPS (diluted) $-19.76 $-3.83 $-0.69
Cash & equivalents $340.29M $206.34M $22.22M
Total debt – $1.81B $95.36M
Shares (diluted) 443.95M 268.43M 169.68M
Enterprise value $7.59B $607.48M -$9.43B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBMNRCLSKFUFU
P/E -1.2x -1.5x -1.3x
P/FCF -37.3x -2.4x –
P/Operating cash flow -37.5x -2.8x –
P/S 179.8x – 0.4x
P/B 0.9x 1.9x 1.6x
P/Tangible book 15.1x 2.2x -49.8x
EV/EBITDA -1.2x -6.8x 5.7x
EV/EBIT -1.2x -3.4x 12.1x
EV/Revenue 174.2x – 0.6x
EV/FCF -36.2x -4.9x –
EV/Operating cash flow -36.4x -5.8x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.01 0.02 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBMNRCLSKFUFU
Revenue growth (1Y) 1,022% – 4.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 409.8% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4,925% – -44.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 915.3% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -303,259% -454.0% -86.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -1,575% -105.8% –
Net income growth (1Y) -245,329% -429.1% -345.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -1,536% -112.5% –
EPS growth (1Y) -507.2% -526.4% -339.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -189.0% -61.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -18,616% -24.6% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -465.8% -150.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -18,922% -335.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -369.4% -345.1% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBMNRCLSKFUFU
Gross margin 84.4% – 2.3%
EBITDA margin -14,504% – 9.7%
Operating margin -14,505% – 4.6%
Pretax margin -14,307% – -35.2%
Net margin -14,334% – -29.3%
FCF margin -481.4% – –
Operating cash flow margin -479.0% – –
Return on equity -81.6% -118.0% -111.7%
Return on assets -81.3% -36.7% -43.5%
Return on invested capital – -32.9% 8.8%
Return on capital employed -82.6% -33.7% 8.4%
Asset turnover 0.0x – 1.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x 0.5x –
Stock comp / revenue 24.6% – 0.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBMNRCLSKFUFU
Debt / assets – 67.1% 36.9%
Debt / equity – 2.4x 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – -3.6x 1.9x
Debt / FCF – -2.9x –
Liabilities / assets 0.3% 71.8% 63.5%
Equity / assets 99.7% 28.2% 36.5%
Interest coverage – -69.6x 1.6x
Current ratio 36.7x 5.9x 4.2x
Quick ratio 28.0x 1.3x 1.9x
Cash ratio 28.0x 1.3x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 215.58 – 3.06

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBMNRCLSKFUFU
Dividend yield 0.1% – –
Net buyback yield -113.3% 63.2% –
Shareholder yield -113.3% 63.2% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBMNRCLSKFUFU
EPS, next fiscal year $-22.41FY2026 $-3.99FY2026 $-0.25FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -267.4%FY2026 -456.3%FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year $127.50MFY2026 $554.31MFY2026 $208.73MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +1,990.2%FY2026 -27.7%FY2026 -56.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +380.0% +18.7% -9.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBMNRCLSKFUFU
Held by institutions 42.6% 86.1% 0.6%
Institutions holding 441 409 16
Change in shares held, QoQ +24.4% +9.5% +18.9%
Institutions buying 277 231 12
Institutions selling 95 114 2
Buyers to sellers 2.92 2.03 6.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BMNRCLSKFUFU
BMNR 1.00 0.66 0.35
CLSK 0.66 1.00 0.37
FUFU 0.35 0.37 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BMNR, CLSK and FUFU?

Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) $10.21B, Cleanspark (CLSK) $1.59B, Bitfufu (FUFU) $148.21M.

Which company is growing faster?

Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) +1,022.4%, Bitfufu (FUFU) +4.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Bitfufu (FUFU) has the highest net margin (Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) -14,334.2%, Bitfufu (FUFU) -29.3%). On return on invested capital, Bitfufu (FUFU) leads (Cleanspark (CLSK) -32.9%, Bitfufu (FUFU) 8.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) returned the most: Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) -54.2%, Cleanspark (CLSK) -65.7%, Bitfufu (FUFU) -74.6%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) has been the steadiest (Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) 89.4%, Cleanspark (CLSK) 94.3%, Bitfufu (FUFU) 105.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BMNR, CLSK and FUFU?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.