BMI vs FERG Stock Comparison

Badger Meter and Ferguson Enterprises Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BMI Badger Meter Inc
$156.05 +20.4% 1M -16.7% 1Y
Market cap
$4.37B
P/E
34.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$881.24M
Div. yield
0.01%
Water Treatment Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Ferguson Enterprises leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Ferguson Enterprises 6, Badger Meter 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBMIFERGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.37B $44.58B FERG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 34.5x 22.0x FERG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 33.0x 21.5x FERG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -2.2% +5.2% FERG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.4% 6.5% BMI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 21.7% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.0x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -16.7% -7.9% FERG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +9.0%/yr +8.8%/yr BMI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 49.5% 29.9% FERG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 67/100 BMI

Percentile Scorecard

BMIFERG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBMIFERG
Valuation 55 #10 of 21 44 #26 of 46
Growth 61 #8 of 19 79 #9 of 39
Profitability 94 #2 of 17 87 #6 of 40
Financial Health 62 #9 of 22 48 #26 of 49
Shareholder Returns 80 #3 of 11 74 #9 of 32
Overall 70 67
  • BMI ranked among 22 companies in Environmental Equipment
  • FERG ranked among 49 companies in Distribution and Rental

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBMIFERGSPY
1 month +20.4%+3.1% -0.8%
3 months +21.9%-2.0% +3.5%
6 months +26.9%-13.2% +7.0%
Year to date -10.5%+3.1% +12.2%
1 year -16.7%-7.9% +13.0%
3 years +13.2%+51.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year +4.2%+14.8% +23.1%
5 years +53.8%+52.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year +9.0%+8.8% +11.0%
10 years +388.1%+333.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year +17.2%+15.8% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBMIFERGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 49.5%29.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 56.0%30.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.681.13 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.34-0.26 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -55.4%-43.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -16.9%-14.3% -1.8%
52-week high $187.87$267.71 $779.14
52-week low $113.41$214.24 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBMIFERG
P/E now vs peer median 35.5xmedian 25.6x 22.0xmedian 25.1x
P/S now vs peer median 5.1xmedian 2.5x 1.4xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 21.6xmedian 19.1x 15.0xmedian 13.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 31.3xmedian 25.2x 19.7xmedian 21.5x
P/B now vs peer median 6.8xmedian 2.0x 7.6xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 2.40median 1.54 —median 2.38

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBMIFERG
Revenue $881.24M $31.35B
Gross profit $366.94M $9.73B
Operating income $165.34M $2.82B
Net income $126.53M $2.03B
Free cash flow $142.39M $2.26B
EPS (diluted) $4.38 $10.42
Cash & equivalents $67.93M $820.00M
Total debt – $4.13B
Shares (diluted) 28.87M 194.80M
Enterprise value $3.77B $41.79B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBMIFERG
P/E 35.5x 22.0x
P/FCF 31.3x 19.7x
P/Operating cash flow 28.1x 17.0x
P/S 5.1x 1.4x
P/B 6.8x 7.6x
P/Tangible book 9.0x 8.5x
EV/EBITDA 21.6x 15.0x
EV/EBIT 26.5x 17.0x
EV/Revenue 5.0x 1.5x
EV/FCF 30.8x 21.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.7x 18.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.40 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBMIFERG
Revenue growth (1Y) -2.2% 5.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.6% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -1.3% 7.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -7.9% 17.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 15.1% –
Net income growth (1Y) -8.8% 31.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 14.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) -6.6% 34.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 14.8% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -12.3% 35.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 15.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -14.4% 42.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 16.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBMIFERG
Gross margin 41.6% 31.0%
EBITDA margin 23.1% 10.2%
Operating margin 18.8% 9.0%
Pretax margin 19.1% 8.3%
Net margin 14.4% 6.5%
FCF margin 16.2% 7.2%
Operating cash flow margin 18.0% 8.3%
Return on equity 19.0% 34.0%
Return on assets 13.0% 11.4%
Return on invested capital – 21.7%
Return on capital employed 20.1% 23.4%
Asset turnover 0.9x 1.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 1.2% 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBMIFERG
Debt / assets – 23.2%
Debt / equity – 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.0x
Debt / FCF – 1.8x
Liabilities / assets 31.0% 67.0%
Equity / assets 69.0% 33.0%
Interest coverage – –
Current ratio 2.5x 1.8x
Quick ratio 1.2x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 11.98 5.41

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBMIFERG
Dividend yield 1.1% 1.6%
Net buyback yield 2.7% 1.9%
Shareholder yield 3.7% 3.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) 37.7% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 33.5% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 14.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 19.8% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBMIFERG
Forward P/E 33.0xFY2026 21.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.73FY2026 $10.68FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -1.3%FY2026 +7.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +10.4% +20.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $930.20MFY2026 $34.30BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +1.5%FY2026 +11.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +10.4% -0.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBMIFERG
Held by institutions 100.0% 96.3%
Institutions holding 479 937
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.9% +2.1%
Institutions buying 254 477
Institutions selling 157 343
Buyers to sellers 1.62 1.39

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BMIFERG
BMI 1.00 0.15
FERG 0.15 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BMI and FERG?

Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Badger Meter (BMI) $4.37B, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) $44.58B.

Which stock is cheaper, BMI and FERG?

Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Badger Meter (BMI) 34.5x, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) 22.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) is cheapest (Badger Meter (BMI) 33.0x, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) 21.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Badger Meter (BMI) -2.2%, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) +5.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Badger Meter (BMI) has the highest net margin (Badger Meter (BMI) 14.4%, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) 6.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) returned the most: Badger Meter (BMI) -16.7%, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) -7.9%. Over five years, Badger Meter (BMI) compounded fastest (Badger Meter (BMI) +9.0%/yr, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) +8.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Badger Meter (BMI) 0.01%, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) 0.00%. Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) has been the steadiest (Badger Meter (BMI) 49.5%, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) 29.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do BMI and FERG move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.15, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, BMI and FERG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.