BLTH vs SQM vs LAC Stock Comparison

American Battery Materials, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile and Lithium Americas Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBLTHSQMLACLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.77M $17.23B $781.58M SQM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.8x 12.4x -26.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 8.5x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +59.0% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 20.6% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 22.8% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.2x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 4.01% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -48.8% +36.0% -64.1% SQM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -46.8%/yr +2.3%/yr — SQM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 288.0% 47.3% 66.6% SQM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 28/100 69/100 — SQM

Percentile Scorecard

BLTHSQMLAC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBLTHSQMLAC
Valuation 20 #130 of 162 81 #32 of 162 93 #12 of 162
Growth 45 #81 of 147 62 #56 of 147 –
Profitability – 81 #24 of 122 –
Financial Health 2 #161 of 164 32 #112 of 164 45 #91 of 164
Shareholder Returns 45 #59 of 107 90 #12 of 107 –
Overall 28 69 –
  • BLTH ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • SQM ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • LAC ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBLTHSQMLACSPY
1 month -43.7%-9.7%-21.5% -0.2%
3 months -65.8%-9.8%-22.3% +3.9%
6 months -59.0%-32.5%-56.1% +8.2%
Year to date -65.8%-12.3%-50.5% +12.9%
1 year -48.8%+36.0%-64.1% +12.3%
3 years -86.3%+18.1%-68.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year -48.5%+5.7%-32.0% +23.3%
5 years -95.7%+11.8%— +67.9%
5 years, per year -46.8%+2.3%— +10.9%
10 years -96.6%+104.0%— +261.1%
10 years, per year -28.7%+7.4%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBLTHSQMLACSPY
Volatility, 1Y 288.0%47.3%66.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 395.5%43.9%64.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.520.982.57 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.170.76-0.96 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.7%-73.5%-82.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -70.7%-36.7%-66.5% -1.2%
52-week high $7.00$95.31$6.44 $779.14
52-week low $2.00$44.36$2.01 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBLTHSQMLAC
P/E now vs peer median -0.8xmedian 13.3x 12.4xmedian 13.3x -26.9xmedian 13.3x
P/S now vs peer median —median 3.2x 2.6xmedian 3.2x —median 3.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.3x 5.1xmedian 7.3x —median 7.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -16.7xmedian 14.7x —median 14.7x —median 14.7x
P/B now vs peer median -0.6xmedian 2.2x 2.0xmedian 2.2x 0.4xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.01median 0.31 -0.79median 0.31 —median 0.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBLTHSQMLAC
Revenue – $6.73B –
Gross profit – $2.83B –
Operating income -$1.75M $3.11B –
Net income -$9.08M $1.39B -$73.07M
Free cash flow -$465.26K – –
R&D – – -$1.00K
EPS (diluted) $-2.41 $4.86 $-0.07
Cash & equivalents $5.70K $3.38B $822.78M
Total debt $30.23M $19.72B $988.02M
Shares (diluted) 3.76M 285.64M 401.74M
Enterprise value $7.72M $6.26B -$971.15M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBLTHSQMLAC
P/E -0.8x 12.4x -26.9x
P/FCF -16.7x – –
P/Operating cash flow -16.7x – –
P/S – 2.6x –
P/B -0.6x 2.0x 0.4x
P/Tangible book -0.6x 2.0x 0.4x
EV/EBITDA – 5.1x –
EV/EBIT -9.4x 5.8x –
EV/Revenue – 2.7x –
EV/FCF -35.3x – –
EV/Operating cash flow -35.3x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.01 -0.79 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBLTHSQMLAC
Revenue growth (1Y) – 59.0% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -4.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 150.2% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -9.3% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 15.9% 134.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 7.2% -17.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) -67.9% 190.5% -33.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -56.6% -7.2% –
EPS growth (1Y) -20.2% 190.5% 63.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -124.5% -15.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 44.2% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 37.3% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 44.2% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 37.3% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBLTHSQMLAC
Gross margin – 42.1% –
EBITDA margin – 52.7% –
Operating margin – 46.2% –
Pretax margin – 36.6% –
Net margin – 20.6% –
FCF margin – – –
Operating cash flow margin – – –
Return on equity – 16.4% –
Return on assets -2,719% 8.6% –
Return on invested capital – 22.8% –
Return on capital employed – 23.4% –
Asset turnover – 0.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.1x – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBLTHSQMLAC
Debt / assets 2,773% 31.3% 27.9%
Debt / equity -0.7x 0.6x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.2x –
Debt / FCF -18.6x – –
Liabilities / assets 4,076% 47.9% 44.9%
Equity / assets -3,976% 52.1% 55.1%
Interest coverage -2.0x 15.3x –
Current ratio 0.0x 2.6x 5.5x
Quick ratio 0.0x 1.8x 3.5x
Cash ratio 0.0x 1.5x 3.5x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBLTHSQMLAC
Dividend yield – 4.0% –
Net buyback yield -1.1% – –
Shareholder yield -1.1% 4.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBLTHSQMLAC
Forward P/E – 8.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $7.12FY2026 $-0.08FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +245.6%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – -2.5% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $8.37BFY2026 $0.00FY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +82.7%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +2.9% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBLTHSQMLAC
Held by institutions – 13.4% 30.8%
Institutions holding – 316 274
Change in shares held, QoQ – -3.0% -0.6%
Institutions buying – 166 149
Institutions selling – 100 57
Buyers to sellers – 1.66 2.61

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BLTHSQMLAC
BLTH 1.00 0.03 0.14
SQM 0.03 1.00 0.52
LAC 0.14 0.52 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BLTH, SQM and LAC?

Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) is the largest by market capitalisation: American Battery Materials (BLTH) $7.77M, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) $17.23B, Lithium Americas (LAC) $781.58M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) returned the most: American Battery Materials (BLTH) -48.8%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) +36.0%, Lithium Americas (LAC) -64.1%. Over five years, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) compounded fastest (American Battery Materials (BLTH) -46.8%/yr, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) +2.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 4.01%. American Battery Materials (BLTH) and Lithium Americas (LAC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) has been the steadiest (American Battery Materials (BLTH) 288.0%, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) 47.3%, Lithium Americas (LAC) 66.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BLTH, SQM and LAC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Chemical & Mining Co Of Chile (SQM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.