BLSH vs BTCS vs WEWA Stock Comparison

Bullish, Btcs and Wewards Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BLSH Bullish
$27.63 -26.5% 1M -49.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.71B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$190.34B
Div. yield
–
Blockchain Infrastructure Technology
3 wins
BTCS BTCS Inc.
$1.06 -30.7% 1M -74.0% 1Y
Market cap
$54.26M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$17.25M
Div. yield
–
Blockchain Infrastructure Technology
2 wins
WEWA Wewards, Inc.
$2.00 0.0% 1M -5.2% 1Y
Market cap
$214.97M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Blockchain Infrastructure Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Bullish leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Bullish 3, Wewards 3, Btcs 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBLSHBTCSWEWALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.71B $54.26M $214.97M BLSH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -2.7x -1.1x -599.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 65.8x 53.0x — BTCS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -26.5% +129.2% — BTCS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -0.7% -295.6% — BLSH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -4.8% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.6x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -49.0% -74.0% -5.2% WEWA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -29.9%/yr +131.8%/yr WEWA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 73.1% 85.6% 5.4% WEWA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 63/100 29/100 — BLSH

Percentile Scorecard

BLSHBTCSWEWA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBLSHBTCSWEWA
Valuation 77 #24 of 99 36 #64 of 99 41 #59 of 99
Growth 33 #63 of 94 37 #60 of 94 84 #16 of 94
Profitability 48 #47 of 90 26 #67 of 90 –
Financial Health 95 #6 of 105 16 #88 of 105 –
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 63 29 –
  • BLSH ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • BTCS ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • WEWA ranked among 109 companies in Fintech

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBLSHBTCSWEWASPY
1 month -26.5%-30.7%0.0% -0.8%
3 months +21.2%0.0%0.0% +3.5%
6 months -29.0%-44.8%0.0% +7.0%
Year to date -27.0%-59.8%-5.2% +12.2%
1 year -49.0%-74.0%-5.2% +13.0%
3 years —+15.2%-1.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year —+4.8%-0.3% +23.1%
5 years —-83.0%+6,566.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year —-29.9%+131.8% +11.0%
10 years —-91.6%+9,900.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year —-21.9%+58.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBLSHBTCSWEWASPY
Volatility, 1Y 73.1%85.6%5.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 70.7%88.9%— 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.723.510.01 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.67-0.86-0.97 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -70.8%-92.9%-9.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -50.9%-74.1%-5.2% -1.8%
52-week high $56.31$4.10$2.11 $779.14
52-week low $21.79$0.98$2.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBLSHBTCSWEWA
P/E now vs peer median -2.5xmedian 20.6x -1.0xmedian 20.6x -599.4xmedian 20.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 2.3x 3.1xmedian 2.3x —median 2.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -32.6xmedian 15.4x —median 15.4x —median 15.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 36.6xmedian 16.4x -6.7xmedian 16.4x -5,608xmedian 16.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 1.9x 1.4xmedian 1.9x 2,866,225xmedian 1.9x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.05 0.01median 1.05 -27.22median 1.05

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBLSHBTCSWEWA
Revenue $190.34B $17.25M –
Gross profit $71.94M $3.38M –
Operating income -$124.59M -$51.44M -$66.83K
Net income -$1.43B -$50.99M -$358.65K
Free cash flow $113.88M -$7.91M -$38.34K
R&D – $552.24K –
EPS (diluted) $-10.84 $-1.02 $0.00
Cash & equivalents $86.61M $262.44K –
Total debt $11.00K $164.18M –
Shares (diluted) 127.72M 49.78M 107.48M
Enterprise value -$1.11B $47.34M $214.97M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBLSHBTCSWEWA
P/E -2.5x -1.0x -599.4x
P/FCF 36.6x -6.7x -5,608x
P/Operating cash flow 33.9x -6.7x -5,608x
P/S 0.0x 3.1x –
P/B 1.7x 1.4x 2,866,225x
P/Tangible book 1.7x 1.5x 2,866,225x
EV/EBITDA -32.6x – –
EV/EBIT -30.9x -1.8x -3,217x
EV/Revenue 0.0x 5.5x –
EV/FCF 33.8x -12.0x -5,608x
EV/Operating cash flow 31.3x -12.0x -5,608x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.01 -27.22

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBLSHBTCSWEWA
Revenue growth (1Y) -26.5% 129.2% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 136.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -17.9% 1,006% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 54.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -57.2% -2,905% 24.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -108.0% 35.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -858.6% -152.6% 39.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -240.5% 22.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -755.9% -41.8% 39.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -131.8% 22.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 190.7% -55.9% 45.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -31.5% 46.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 171.4% -56.0% 45.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -31.6% 46.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBLSHBTCSWEWA
Gross margin 0.0% 19.6% –
EBITDA margin -0.1% – –
Operating margin -0.1% -298.2% –
Pretax margin -0.8% -327.9% –
Net margin -0.7% -295.6% –
FCF margin 0.1% -45.9% –
Operating cash flow margin 0.1% -45.8% –
Return on equity -55.4% -63.4% –
Return on assets -44.5% -37.2% -191,282%
Return on invested capital -4.8% – –
Return on capital employed -4.0% -47.2% –
Asset turnover 59.3x 0.1x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.1x 0.2x 0.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.0% 6.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBLSHBTCSWEWA
Debt / assets 0.0% 47.3% –
Debt / equity 0.0x 1.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.6x – –
Debt / FCF 0.0x -5.3x –
Liabilities / assets 20.6% 56.5% –
Equity / assets 79.4% 43.5% 100.0%
Interest coverage -2.2x -10.0x -0.2x
Current ratio 23.5x 2.1x –
Quick ratio 2.5x 0.0x –
Cash ratio 2.5x 0.0x –
Altman Z-score 64.94 -4.82 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBLSHBTCSWEWA
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 0.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBLSHBTCSWEWA
Forward P/E 65.8xFY2026 53.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.42FY2026 $0.02FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +40.0%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +95.2% -14,200.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $364.64MFY2026 $20.63MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +26.4%FY2026 +25.1%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +5.7% +96.4% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBLSHBTCSWEWA
Held by institutions 32.8% 16.4% –
Institutions holding 175 53 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.8% -21.8% –
Institutions buying 87 27 –
Institutions selling 70 17 –
Buyers to sellers 1.24 1.59 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BLSHBTCSWEWA
BLSH 1.00 0.59 0.07
BTCS 0.59 1.00 0.05
WEWA 0.07 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BLSH, BTCS and WEWA?

Bullish (BLSH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bullish (BLSH) $3.71B, Btcs (BTCS) $54.26M, Wewards (WEWA) $214.97M.

Which company is growing faster?

Btcs (BTCS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bullish (BLSH) -26.5%, Btcs (BTCS) +129.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Bullish (BLSH) has the highest net margin (Bullish (BLSH) -0.7%, Btcs (BTCS) -295.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Wewards (WEWA) returned the most: Bullish (BLSH) -49.0%, Btcs (BTCS) -74.0%, Wewards (WEWA) -5.2%. Over five years, Wewards (WEWA) compounded fastest (Btcs (BTCS) -29.9%/yr, Wewards (WEWA) +131.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Wewards (WEWA) has been the steadiest (Bullish (BLSH) 73.1%, Btcs (BTCS) 85.6%, Wewards (WEWA) 5.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BLSH, BTCS and WEWA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bullish (BLSH) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.