BLNK vs XCH vs BEEM Stock Comparison

Blink Charging, Xchg and Beam Global Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BLNK Blink Charging Co.
$0.38 -34.5% 1M -79.1% 1Y
Market cap
$56.45M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$96.55M
Div. yield
–
EV Charging Industrials
4 wins
XCH XCHG Ltd
$1.95 -41.8% 1M +18.2% 1Y
Market cap
$8.08M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
EV Charging Industrials
1 win
BEEM Beam Global
$0.89 -25.2% 1M -69.2% 1Y
Market cap
$19.13M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$26.53M
Div. yield
–
EV Charging Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Blink Charging leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Blink Charging 4, Beam Global 3, Xchg 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBLNKXCHBEEMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $56.45M $8.08M $19.13M BLNK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.1x — -1.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -5.9% — -20.5% BLNK
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -52.5% — -64.5% BLNK
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -100.0% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.8x — 0.1x BEEM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -79.1% +18.2% -69.2% XCH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -58.2%/yr — -51.2%/yr BEEM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 82.3% 328.8% 78.8% BEEM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 — 29/100 BLNK

Percentile Scorecard

BLNKXCHBEEM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBLNKXCHBEEM
Valuation 32 #42 of 61 – 25 #46 of 61
Growth 90 #7 of 58 – 25 #44 of 58
Profitability 41 #33 of 55 – 32 #38 of 55
Financial Health 53 #34 of 71 29 #51 of 71 39 #44 of 71
Shareholder Returns – – 28 #22 of 30
Overall 54 – 29
  • BLNK ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • XCH ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • BEEM ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBLNKXCHBEEMSPY
1 month -34.5%-41.8%-25.2% -0.2%
3 months -26.9%+290.0%-14.4% +3.9%
6 months -49.3%+105.3%-54.1% +8.2%
Year to date -43.3%+72.6%-40.7% +12.9%
1 year -79.1%+18.2%-69.2% +12.3%
3 years -83.8%—-83.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year -45.5%—-45.6% +23.3%
5 years -98.7%—-97.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year -58.2%—-51.2% +10.9%
10 years -97.9%—-89.5% +261.1%
10 years, per year -32.0%—-20.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBLNKXCHBEEMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 82.3%328.8%78.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 81.6%134.8%77.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.100.702.59 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.960.06-0.88 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.2%-99.2%-97.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -79.1%-57.8%-69.2% -1.2%
52-week high $1.82$4.62$2.89 $779.14
52-week low $0.38$0.23$0.87 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBLNKXCHBEEM
P/E now vs peer median -1.1xmedian 27.2x —median 27.2x -1.1xmedian 27.2x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 2.4x —median 2.4x 0.7xmedian 2.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -0.5xmedian 18.4x —median 18.4x -1.4xmedian 18.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -4.3xmedian 28.6x —median 28.6x -1.5xmedian 28.6x
P/B now vs peer median 1.1xmedian 1.7x 1.3xmedian 1.7x 1.0xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median -0.02median 0.79 —median 0.79 0.03median 0.79

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBLNKXCHBEEM
Revenue $96.55M – $26.53M
Gross profit $28.68M – $2.70M
Operating income -$51.16M – -$17.23M
Net income -$48.32M – -$17.11M
Free cash flow -$12.82M – -$12.98M
EPS (diluted) $-0.35 – $-0.97
Cash & equivalents $34.00M $11.41M $1.03M
Total debt $265.00K $29.61M $165.00K
Shares (diluted) 144.26M 3.50M 17.69M
Enterprise value -$78.22M -$60.36M $11.79M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBLNKXCHBEEM
P/E -1.1x – -1.1x
P/FCF -4.3x – -1.5x
P/Operating cash flow -9.6x – -1.5x
P/S 0.6x – 0.7x
P/B 1.1x 1.3x 1.0x
P/Tangible book 1.3x 1.3x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA -0.5x – -1.4x
EV/EBIT -0.4x – -1.1x
EV/Revenue 0.2x – 0.7x
EV/FCF -1.6x – -1.5x
EV/Operating cash flow -3.7x – -1.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.02 – 0.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBLNKXCHBEEM
Revenue growth (1Y) -5.9% – -20.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.8% – -16.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 12.9% – -50.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 0.7% – 92.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 76.3% – 27.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 25.7% – 7.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 77.5% – 25.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 27.2% – -39.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 83.3% – 35.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 44.2% – -35.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 88.8% – -214.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 63.4% – 5.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 76.6% – -132.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 53.2% – 8.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBLNKXCHBEEM
Gross margin 29.7% – 10.2%
EBITDA margin -43.6% – -51.9%
Operating margin -53.0% – -64.9%
Pretax margin -49.8% – -64.9%
Net margin -52.5% – -64.5%
FCF margin -13.3% – -48.9%
Operating cash flow margin -5.9% – -49.8%
Return on equity -99.5% – -82.4%
Return on assets -39.7% – -44.1%
Return on invested capital -100.0% – –
Return on capital employed -76.4% – -64.0%
Asset turnover 0.8x – 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.1x – 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue 3.1% – 5.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBLNKXCHBEEM
Debt / assets 0.2% 19.7% 0.4%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.8x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.8x – 0.1x
Debt / FCF 0.0x – 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 60.9% 74.7% 46.9%
Equity / assets 39.1% 25.3% 53.1%
Interest coverage – – -861.4x
Current ratio 1.2x 1.2x 1.5x
Quick ratio 0.9x 0.7x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.6x 0.4x 0.1x
Altman Z-score -9.66 – -5.15

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBLNKXCHBEEM
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – -15.3%
Shareholder yield – – -15.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBLNKXCHBEEM
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.21FY2026 $-2.46FY2026 $-0.72FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year $90.27MFY2026 $34.13MFY2026 $27.60MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -12.8%FY2026 +36.0%FY2026 -2.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +20.4% +27.9% +23.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBLNKXCHBEEM
Held by institutions 12.1% – 9.8%
Institutions holding 113 – 50
Change in shares held, QoQ -26.4% – -14.9%
Institutions buying 37 – 26
Institutions selling 27 – 9
Buyers to sellers 1.37 – 2.89

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BLNKXCHBEEM
BLNK 1.00 0.07 0.45
XCH 0.07 1.00 0.21
BEEM 0.45 0.21 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BLNK, XCH and BEEM?

Blink Charging (BLNK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Blink Charging (BLNK) $56.45M, Xchg (XCH) $8.08M, Beam Global (BEEM) $19.13M.

Which company is growing faster?

Blink Charging (BLNK) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Blink Charging (BLNK) -5.9%, Beam Global (BEEM) -20.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Blink Charging (BLNK) has the highest net margin (Blink Charging (BLNK) -52.5%, Beam Global (BEEM) -64.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Xchg (XCH) returned the most: Blink Charging (BLNK) -79.1%, Xchg (XCH) +18.2%, Beam Global (BEEM) -69.2%. Over five years, Beam Global (BEEM) compounded fastest (Blink Charging (BLNK) -58.2%/yr, Beam Global (BEEM) -51.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Beam Global (BEEM) has been the steadiest (Blink Charging (BLNK) 82.3%, Xchg (XCH) 328.8%, Beam Global (BEEM) 78.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BLNK, XCH and BEEM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Blink Charging (BLNK) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.