BLNK vs EVGO vs NAAS Stock Comparison

Blink Charging, EVgo and NaaS Technology Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BLNK Blink Charging Co.
$0.41 -26.8% 1M -76.2% 1Y
Market cap
$58.95M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$96.55M
Div. yield
–
EV Charging Industrials
1 win
EVGO EVgo Inc.
$1.25 -6.7% 1M -69.6% 1Y
Market cap
$393.14M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$402.95M
Div. yield
–
EV Charging Industrials
7 wins
NAAS NaaS Technology Inc.
$2.12 -34.6% 1M -39.4% 1Y
Market cap
$142.20K
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
EV Charging Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

EVgo leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (EVgo 7, NaaS Technology 1, Blink Charging 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBLNKEVGONAASLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $58.95M $393.14M $142.20K EVGO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.2x -3.2x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -5.9% +30.7% — EVGO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -52.5% -13.5% — EVGO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -100.0% -44.7% — EVGO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.8x -3.8x — EVGO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -76.2% -69.6% -39.4% NAAS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -58.1%/yr -33.1%/yr — EVGO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 82.6% 66.7% 70.2% EVGO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 42/100 — BLNK

Percentile Scorecard

BLNKEVGONAAS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBLNKEVGONAAS
Valuation 38 #38 of 61 35 #40 of 61 –
Growth 90 #7 of 58 49 #30 of 58 –
Profitability 41 #33 of 55 52 #27 of 55 –
Financial Health 51 #35 of 71 33 #48 of 71 0 #71 of 71
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 55 42 –
  • BLNK ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • EVGO ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • NAAS ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBLNKEVGONAASSPY
1 month -26.8%-6.7%-34.6% +0.9%
3 months -12.8%-19.4%-34.0% +5.9%
6 months -42.3%-40.5%+3.9% +8.5%
Year to date -38.8%-57.0%-37.3% +13.3%
1 year -76.2%-69.6%-39.4% +12.4%
3 years -82.5%-42.9%-99.8% +88.1%
3 years, per year -44.1%-17.1%-87.1% +23.5%
5 years -98.7%-86.6%— +68.2%
5 years, per year -58.1%-33.1%— +11.0%
10 years -97.7%—— +263.4%
10 years, per year -31.5%—— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureBLNKEVGONAASSPY
Volatility, 1Y 82.6%66.7%70.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 81.5%67.0%68.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.122.760.83 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.92-1.04-0.56 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.2%-94.7%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -76.2%-69.6%-47.4% -0.9%
52-week high $1.72$4.11$4.03 $779.14
52-week low $0.38$1.02$1.97 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBLNKEVGONAAS
P/E now vs peer median -1.2xmedian 29.4x -3.2xmedian 29.4x —median 29.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 2.6x 1.0xmedian 2.6x —median 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -0.6xmedian 18.4x -12.5xmedian 18.4x —median 18.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -4.6xmedian 24.4x -2.0xmedian 24.4x —median 24.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 1.8x -19.2xmedian 1.8x 0.0xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median -0.03median 1.07 -0.12median 1.07 —median 1.07

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBLNKEVGONAAS
Revenue $96.55M $402.95M –
Gross profit $28.68M $77.85M –
Operating income -$51.16M -$122.95M –
Net income -$48.32M -$102.15M –
Free cash flow -$12.82M -$193.34M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.35 $-0.39 –
Cash & equivalents $34.00M $121.82M $11.38M
Total debt $265.00K $297.25M $158.09M
Shares (diluted) 144.26M 140.36M 35.27K
Enterprise value -$75.72M $146.61M -$45.24M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBLNKEVGONAAS
P/E -1.2x -3.2x –
P/FCF -4.6x -2.0x –
P/Operating cash flow -10.3x -7.4x –
P/S 0.6x 1.0x –
P/B 1.2x -19.2x 0.0x
P/Tangible book 1.4x -7.8x 0.0x
EV/EBITDA -0.6x -12.5x –
EV/EBIT -0.5x -4.6x –
EV/Revenue 0.3x 1.4x –
EV/FCF -2.0x -2.9x –
EV/Operating cash flow -4.4x -10.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.03 -0.12 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBLNKEVGONAAS
Revenue growth (1Y) -5.9% 30.7% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.8% 52.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 12.9% 97.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 0.7% 295.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 76.3% 6.2% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 25.7% 8.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) 77.5% 7.2% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 27.2% 9.7% –
EPS growth (1Y) 83.3% -7.2% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 44.2% 27.8% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 88.8% -1,816% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 63.4% -7.5% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 76.6% -120.7% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 53.2% 10.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBLNKEVGONAAS
Gross margin 29.7% 19.3% –
EBITDA margin -43.6% -11.3% –
Operating margin -53.0% -30.5% –
Pretax margin -49.8% -31.8% –
Net margin -52.5% -13.5% –
FCF margin -13.3% -48.0% –
Operating cash flow margin -5.9% -13.3% –
Return on equity -99.5% -1,342% –
Return on assets -39.7% -13.0% –
Return on invested capital -100.0% -44.7% –
Return on capital employed -76.4% -15.0% –
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.1x 0.5x –
Stock comp / revenue 3.1% 5.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBLNKEVGONAAS
Debt / assets 0.2% 30.7% 195.9%
Debt / equity 0.0x -14.5x -0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.8x -3.8x –
Debt / FCF 0.0x -1.5x –
Liabilities / assets 60.9% 102.1% 404.2%
Equity / assets 39.1% -2.1% -304.2%
Interest coverage – -7.8x –
Current ratio 1.2x 2.2x 0.2x
Quick ratio 0.9x 1.2x -0.1x
Cash ratio 0.6x 1.0x 0.1x
Altman Z-score -9.63 0.39 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBLNKEVGONAAS
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBLNKEVGONAAS
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.21FY2026 $-0.52FY2026 $-6.73FY2024
Revenue, next fiscal year $90.27MFY2026 $420.77MFY2026 $59.32MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -12.8%FY2026 +9.5%FY2026 +231.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +20.4% +16.5% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBLNKEVGONAAS
Held by institutions 12.1% 71.2% –
Institutions holding 113 193 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -26.4% +6.8% –
Institutions buying 37 101 –
Institutions selling 27 41 –
Buyers to sellers 1.37 2.46 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BLNKEVGONAAS
BLNK 1.00 0.41 0.09
EVGO 0.41 1.00 0.10
NAAS 0.09 0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BLNK, EVGO and NAAS?

EVgo (EVGO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Blink Charging (BLNK) $58.95M, EVgo (EVGO) $393.14M, NaaS Technology (NAAS) $142.20K.

Which company is growing faster?

EVgo (EVGO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Blink Charging (BLNK) -5.9%, EVgo (EVGO) +30.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

EVgo (EVGO) has the highest net margin (Blink Charging (BLNK) -52.5%, EVgo (EVGO) -13.5%). On return on invested capital, EVgo (EVGO) leads (Blink Charging (BLNK) -100.0%, EVgo (EVGO) -44.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year NaaS Technology (NAAS) returned the most: Blink Charging (BLNK) -76.2%, EVgo (EVGO) -69.6%, NaaS Technology (NAAS) -39.4%. Over five years, EVgo (EVGO) compounded fastest (Blink Charging (BLNK) -58.1%/yr, EVgo (EVGO) -33.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, EVgo (EVGO) has been the steadiest (Blink Charging (BLNK) 82.6%, EVgo (EVGO) 66.7%, NaaS Technology (NAAS) 70.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BLNK, EVGO and NAAS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, EVgo (EVGO) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.