BLNE vs TAP vs CWGL Stock Comparison

Beeline Holdings, Molson Coors Beverage and Crimson Wine Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BLNE Beeline Holdings, Inc.
$0.71 -20.2% 1M -79.3% 1Y
Market cap
$23.24M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$10.02M
Div. yield
–
Spirits and Wine Consumer Staples
1 win
CWGL Crimson Wine Group, Ltd
$4.01 -9.3% 1M -23.6% 1Y
Market cap
$82.55M
P/E
117.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$72.36M
Div. yield
–
Spirits and Wine Consumer Staples
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Molson Coors Beverage leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Molson Coors Beverage 6, Crimson Wine 2, Beeline Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBLNETAPCWGLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $23.24M $8.54B $82.55M TAP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.0x -3.2x 117.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 8.9x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +269.9% -2.6% +1.5% BLNE
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -231.1% -17.8% 1.0% CWGL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -12.5% -0.7% CWGL
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.5x -3.2x 4.6x TAP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 4.84% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -79.3% -12.9% -23.6% TAP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -2.1%/yr -14.5%/yr TAP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 105.2% 29.6% 30.7% TAP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 16/100 52/100 45/100 TAP

Percentile Scorecard

BLNETAPCWGL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBLNETAPCWGL
Valuation 11 #34 of 38 84 #7 of 38 65 #14 of 38
Growth 13 #29 of 33 6 #31 of 33 22 #26 of 33
Profitability 13 #27 of 31 33 #21 of 31 50 #16 of 31
Financial Health 42 #22 of 37 36 #24 of 37 75 #10 of 37
Shareholder Returns 0 #23 of 23 100 #1 of 23 14 #20 of 23
Overall 16 52 45
  • BLNE ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • TAP ranked among 41 companies in Beverages
  • CWGL ranked among 41 companies in Beverages

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBLNETAPCWGLSPY
1 month -20.2%+9.6%-9.3% -0.2%
3 months -26.8%-7.2%+0.2% +3.9%
6 months -61.0%-7.4%-7.4% +8.2%
Year to date -58.7%-15.5%-18.2% +12.9%
1 year -79.3%-12.9%-23.6% +12.3%
3 years —-30.5%-27.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year —-11.4%-10.0% +23.3%
5 years —-10.1%-54.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year —-2.1%-14.5% +10.9%
10 years —-62.4%-57.8% +261.1%
10 years, per year —-9.3%-8.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBLNETAPCWGLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 105.2%29.6%30.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 115.8%32.0%35.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.63-0.270.10 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.75-0.44-0.77 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -93.5%-49.1%-56.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -80.2%-27.5%-23.6% -1.2%
52-week high $3.59$54.38$5.25 $779.14
52-week low $0.63$35.96$3.90 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBLNETAPCWGL
P/E now vs peer median -1.0xmedian 26.1x -3.2xmedian 26.1x 117.3xmedian 26.1x
P/S now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 1.6x 0.7xmedian 1.6x 1.1xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -1.9xmedian 14.0x -8.0xmedian 14.0x 19.7xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.3xmedian 18.1x 6.4xmedian 18.1x -2.6xmedian 18.1x
P/B now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 2.6x 0.8xmedian 2.6x 0.4xmedian 2.6x
PEG now vs peer median -0.01median 2.07 0.01median 2.07 -24.18median 2.07

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBLNETAPCWGL
Revenue $10.02M $12.93B $72.36M
Gross profit – $4.10B $32.85M
Operating income -$20.55M -$2.52B -$2.29M
Net income -$21.63M -$2.34B $704.00K
Free cash flow -$18.00M $1.33B -$31.77M
EPS (diluted) $-0.74 $-12.29 $0.03
Cash & equivalents $1.41M $2.13B $11.84M
Total debt $10.41M $7.71B $36.85M
Shares (diluted) 31.41M 187.70M 20.59M
Enterprise value $15.57M $4.37B $12.21M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBLNETAPCWGL
P/E -1.0x -3.2x 117.3x
P/FCF -1.3x 6.4x -2.6x
P/Operating cash flow -1.3x 4.3x 8.8x
P/S 2.3x 0.7x 1.1x
P/B 0.5x 0.8x 0.4x
P/Tangible book 0.5x -5.6x 0.4x
EV/EBITDA -1.9x -8.0x 19.7x
EV/EBIT -1.6x -5.6x -47.0x
EV/Revenue 3.2x 1.1x 1.5x
EV/FCF -1.8x 10.7x -3.4x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.8x 7.1x 11.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.01 0.01 -24.18

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBLNETAPCWGL
Revenue growth (1Y) 269.9% -2.6% 1.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -3.2% -1.0% 0.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -6.2% -0.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 1.7% 0.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -56.6% -256.4% -199.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -46.5% -94.9% -59.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -1.2% -318.2% 143.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -11.5% -307.5% -6.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 72.6% -338.3% 143.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 84.3% -307.3% -4.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -101.3% 20.3% 292.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -115.9% 4.6% 45.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -101.3% 38.0% -1,125%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -112.1% 5.7% -71.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBLNETAPCWGL
Gross margin – 31.7% 45.4%
EBITDA margin -172.1% -13.6% 7.5%
Operating margin -205.0% -19.5% -3.2%
Pretax margin -212.2% -21.3% 1.5%
Net margin -231.1% -17.8% 1.0%
FCF margin -179.5% 10.3% -43.9%
Operating cash flow margin -179.5% 15.3% 13.0%
Return on equity -42.7% -22.9% 0.4%
Return on assets -32.5% -10.1% 0.3%
Return on invested capital – -12.5% -0.7%
Return on capital employed -37.9% -13.9% -1.0%
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.6x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x -0.8x 13.4x
Stock comp / revenue 20.2% 0.3% 0.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBLNETAPCWGL
Debt / assets 16.5% 31.6% 15.6%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.7x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.5x -3.2x 4.6x
Debt / FCF -0.6x 5.8x -1.2x
Liabilities / assets 19.8% 57.7% 21.2%
Equity / assets 80.2% 42.3% 78.8%
Interest coverage -70.9x – -1.6x
Current ratio 1.1x 0.9x 10.5x
Quick ratio 0.1x 0.6x 2.1x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.4x 1.0x
Altman Z-score -2.79 0.86 1.27

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBLNETAPCWGL
Dividend yield – 4.8% –
Net buyback yield -15.4% 6.5% 0.0%
Shareholder yield -15.4% 11.3% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBLNETAPCWGL
Forward P/E – 8.9xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.01FY2026 $4.42FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – -18.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +3.4% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $27.10MFY2026 $10.73BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +225.4%FY2026 -3.7%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +143.7% -1.1% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBLNETAPCWGL
Held by institutions 12.8% 100.0% 17.4%
Institutions holding 38 617 5
Change in shares held, QoQ -9.2% +12.2% +1.4%
Institutions buying 20 340 2
Institutions selling 7 196 2
Buyers to sellers 2.86 1.73 1.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BLNETAPCWGL
BLNE 1.00 0.00 0.03
TAP 0.00 1.00 -0.12
CWGL 0.03 -0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BLNE, TAP and CWGL?

Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Beeline Holdings (BLNE) $23.24M, Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) $8.54B, Crimson Wine (CWGL) $82.55M.

Which company is growing faster?

Beeline Holdings (BLNE) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Beeline Holdings (BLNE) +269.9%, Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) -2.6%, Crimson Wine (CWGL) +1.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Crimson Wine (CWGL) has the highest net margin (Beeline Holdings (BLNE) -231.1%, Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) -17.8%, Crimson Wine (CWGL) 1.0%). On return on invested capital, Crimson Wine (CWGL) leads (Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) -12.5%, Crimson Wine (CWGL) -0.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) returned the most: Beeline Holdings (BLNE) -79.3%, Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) -12.9%, Crimson Wine (CWGL) -23.6%. Over five years, Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) compounded fastest (Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) -2.1%/yr, Crimson Wine (CWGL) -14.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) 4.84%. Beeline Holdings (BLNE) and Crimson Wine (CWGL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) has been the steadiest (Beeline Holdings (BLNE) 105.2%, Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) 29.6%, Crimson Wine (CWGL) 30.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BLNE, TAP and CWGL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Molson Coors Beverage (TAP) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.