BLNC vs MFC vs MRSH Stock Comparison

Balance Labs, Manulife Financial and Marsh & Mclennan Companies Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BLNC Balance Labs, Inc.
$1.55 0.0% 1M -29.5% 1Y
Market cap
$72.62M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
-$10.17K
Div. yield
–
Financial Advisory Financial Services
MFC Manulife Financial Corp
$44.65 +1.8% 1M +37.0% 1Y
Market cap
$76.64B
P/E
16.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$47.47B
Div. yield
-0.03%
Life Insurance Financial Services
7 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Manulife Financial leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Manulife Financial 7, Marsh & Mclennan Companies 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBLNCMFCMRSHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $72.62M $76.64B $90.99B MRSH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -2.3x 16.2x 22.5x MFC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 13.5x 19.1x MFC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +19.7% +7.6% MFC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 10.0% 14.2% MRSH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 13.1% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 2.7x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — -0.03% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -29.5% +37.0% +4.4% MFC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +9.2%/yr +17.5%/yr +3.0%/yr MFC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 54.3% 20.2% 25.9% MFC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 7/100 50/100 35/100 MFC

Percentile Scorecard

BLNCMFCMRSH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBLNCMFCMRSH
Valuation 11 #164 of 184 60 #48 of 119 10 #107 of 119
Growth 1 #112 of 113 80 #24 of 115 15 #98 of 115
Profitability – 57 #49 of 113 71 #33 of 113
Financial Health 9 #152 of 167 13 #99 of 114 21 #90 of 114
Shareholder Returns – 39 #66 of 107 57 #47 of 107
Overall 7 50 35
  • BLNC ranked among 212 companies in Asset and Wealth Management
  • MFC ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • MRSH ranked among 126 companies in Insurance

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBLNCMFCMRSHSPY
1 month 0.0%+1.8%+13.8% -0.8%
3 months 0.0%+1.4%+6.3% +3.5%
6 months 0.0%+15.7%+14.5% +7.0%
Year to date 0.0%+23.1%+5.0% +12.2%
1 year -29.5%+37.0%+4.4% +13.0%
3 years +573.9%+160.5%+5.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +89.0%+37.6%+1.8% +23.1%
5 years +55.0%+124.0%+16.2% +68.6%
5 years, per year +9.2%+17.5%+3.0% +11.0%
10 years -22.5%+206.5%+208.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year -2.5%+11.9%+11.9% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBLNCMFCMRSHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 54.3%20.2%25.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y —21.3%24.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.170.73-0.38 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.541.830.17 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -85.0%-29.9%-35.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -29.5%-2.1%-2.3% -1.8%
52-week high $2.20$45.60$199.34 $779.14
52-week low $1.11$32.15$157.32 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBLNCMFCMRSH
P/E now vs peer median -2.3xmedian 33.6x 16.0xmedian 10.6x 22.9xmedian 10.6x
P/S now vs peer median -7,138xmedian 4.9x 1.6xmedian 1.4x 3.3xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 11.5x —median 7.6x 15.9xmedian 7.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -164.7xmedian 13.2x 3.3xmedian 8.6x 22.3xmedian 8.6x
P/B now vs peer median -26.2xmedian 1.8x 2.0xmedian 1.5x 6.2xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.01median 0.91 0.72median 0.52 3.43median 0.52

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBLNCMFCMRSH
Revenue -$10.17K $47.47B $28.46B
Operating income -$13.94M – $6.09B
Net income -$31.67M $4.76B $4.12B
Free cash flow -$440.96K $23.26B $4.15B
EPS (diluted) $-0.68 $2.78 $8.44
Cash & equivalents $117.47K – $1.84B
Total debt $1.91M $185.03B $20.53B
Shares (diluted) 46.85M 1.71B 479.00M
Enterprise value $71.82M -$18.24B $83.15B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBLNCMFCMRSH
P/E -2.3x 16.0x 22.9x
P/FCF -164.7x 3.3x 22.3x
P/Operating cash flow -164.7x 3.3x 20.7x
P/S -7,138x 1.6x 3.3x
P/B -26.2x 2.0x 6.2x
P/Tangible book -26.2x 2.0x 8.9x
EV/EBITDA – – 15.9x
EV/EBIT -5.2x 14.5x 18.3x
EV/Revenue -7,128x 2.2x 3.9x
EV/FCF -164.5x 4.4x 26.8x
EV/Operating cash flow -164.5x 4.4x 24.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.01 0.72 3.43

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBLNCMFCMRSH
Revenue growth (1Y) – 19.7% 7.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -140.7% 13.5% 8.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -4,457% – -1.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -533.9% – 7.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -6,739% -19.1% -1.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -292.7% 68.2% 5.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -3,064% 14.8% 1.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -203.7% 22.3% 6.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -202.7% 139.4% -12.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -113.4% 40.5% 4.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -202.7% 139.4% -13.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -113.4% 40.5% 5.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBLNCMFCMRSH
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – 24.6%
Operating margin – – 21.4%
Pretax margin – 12.8% 18.9%
Net margin – 10.0% 14.2%
FCF margin – 49.0% 14.6%
Operating cash flow margin 4,334% 49.0% 15.7%
Return on equity – 9.2% 27.2%
Return on assets -16,393% 0.5% 6.9%
Return on invested capital – – 13.1%
Return on capital employed – – 16.2%
Asset turnover -0.1x 0.1x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x 4.9x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue -131,374% – 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBLNCMFCMRSH
Debt / assets 19.7% 6.0% 34.3%
Debt / equity 0.0x 1.2x 1.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 2.7x
Debt / FCF -0.1x 2.0x 4.9x
Liabilities / assets 2,288% 95.0% 75.1%
Equity / assets -2,188% 5.0% 24.9%
Interest coverage -119.8x 6.7x 6.3x
Current ratio 0.0x – 1.1x
Quick ratio 0.0x – 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.0x – 0.1x
Altman Z-score -790.54 – 2.77

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBLNCMFCMRSH
Dividend yield – 4.2% 1.9%
Net buyback yield – 2.1% 3.1%
Shareholder yield – 6.4% 5.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 46.9% 43.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 9.6% 43.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – -181.7% 8.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 13.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBLNCMFCMRSH
Forward P/E – 13.5xFY2026 19.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $3.31FY2026 $10.21FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +7.8%FY2026 +4.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +3.6% +15.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $32.55BFY2026 $30.28BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +12.3%FY2026 +12.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +5.6% +6.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBLNCMFCMRSH
Held by institutions – 44.4% 93.9%
Institutions holding – 810 1,496
Change in shares held, QoQ – 0.0% +2.8%
Institutions buying – 383 624
Institutions selling – 227 652
Buyers to sellers – 1.69 0.96

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BLNCMFCMRSH
BLNC 1.00 -0.06 0.03
MFC -0.06 1.00 0.11
MRSH 0.03 0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BLNC, MFC and MRSH?

Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Balance Labs (BLNC) $72.62M, Manulife Financial (MFC) $76.64B, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) $90.99B.

Which stock is cheaper, BLNC, MFC and MRSH?

Manulife Financial (MFC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Balance Labs (BLNC) -2.3x, Manulife Financial (MFC) 16.2x, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 22.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Manulife Financial (MFC) is cheapest (Manulife Financial (MFC) 13.5x, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 19.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Manulife Financial (MFC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Manulife Financial (MFC) +19.7%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) +7.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) has the highest net margin (Manulife Financial (MFC) 10.0%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 14.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Manulife Financial (MFC) returned the most: Balance Labs (BLNC) -29.5%, Manulife Financial (MFC) +37.0%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) +4.4%. Over five years, Manulife Financial (MFC) compounded fastest (Balance Labs (BLNC) +9.2%/yr, Manulife Financial (MFC) +17.5%/yr, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) +3.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Manulife Financial (MFC) -0.03%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 0.02%. Balance Labs (BLNC) and Manulife Financial (MFC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Manulife Financial (MFC) has been the steadiest (Balance Labs (BLNC) 54.3%, Manulife Financial (MFC) 20.2%, Marsh & Mclennan Companies (MRSH) 25.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BLNC, MFC and MRSH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Manulife Financial (MFC) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.