BLMN vs DRI vs DIN Stock Comparison

Bloomin' Brands, Darden Restaurants and Dine Brands Global Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BLMN Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
$9.14 +16.0% 1M +14.5% 1Y
Market cap
$776.02M
P/E
28.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.98B
Div. yield
0.02%
Full-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
DRI Darden Restaurants Inc
$213.25 +6.7% 1M +15.4% 1Y
Market cap
$24.26B
P/E
20.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.37B
Div. yield
–
Full-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
10 wins
DIN Dine Brands Global, Inc.
$31.94 +13.3% 1M +15.2% 1Y
Market cap
$382.56M
P/E
60.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$899.84M
Div. yield
0.05%
Full-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Darden Restaurants leads on 10 of the 12 questions below (Darden Restaurants 10, Dine Brands Global 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBLMNDRIDINLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $776.02M $24.26B $382.56M DRI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.1x 20.5x 60.8x DRI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.9x 18.0x 7.1x DIN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.2% +8.1% +6.4% DRI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.7% 8.8% 0.7% DRI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.2% 32.9% 1.9% DRI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.5x 1.1x 14.7x DRI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.00% 0.05% DIN
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +14.5% +15.4% +15.2% DRI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -15.8%/yr +8.2%/yr -17.5%/yr DRI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 74.7% 27.9% 44.5% DRI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 42/100 48/100 20/100 DRI

Percentile Scorecard

BLMNDRIDIN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBLMNDRIDIN
Valuation 86 #8 of 50 33 #34 of 50 22 #39 of 50
Growth 33 #32 of 47 26 #35 of 47 0 #47 of 47
Profitability 44 #26 of 46 80 #10 of 46 27 #34 of 46
Financial Health 18 #42 of 51 28 #37 of 51 12 #45 of 51
Shareholder Returns 28 #24 of 33 75 #9 of 33 41 #20 of 33
Overall 42 48 20
  • BLMN ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants
  • DRI ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants
  • DIN ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBLMNDRIDINSPY
1 month +16.0%+6.7%+13.3% -0.8%
3 months +7.0%+4.5%-9.4% +3.5%
6 months +50.3%+7.3%+15.9% +7.0%
Year to date +48.1%+15.9%-0.6% +12.2%
1 year +14.5%+15.4%+15.2% +13.0%
3 years -60.7%+49.7%-34.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year -26.7%+14.4%-13.2% +23.1%
5 years -57.7%+48.6%-61.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year -15.8%+8.2%-17.5% +11.0%
10 years -45.6%+248.7%-59.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year -5.9%+13.3%-8.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBLMNDRIDINSPY
Volatility, 1Y 74.7%27.9%44.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 63.6%28.2%43.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.200.180.54 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.190.550.34 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.3%-28.1%-79.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -22.9%-6.4%-17.7% -1.8%
52-week high $11.85$227.72$38.81 $779.14
52-week low $5.26$169.21$24.15 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBLMNDRIDIN
P/E now vs peer median 28.3xmedian 20.5x 20.5xmedian 20.5x 60.9xmedian 20.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 1.1x 1.8xmedian 1.1x 0.4xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.7xmedian 13.3x 12.4xmedian 13.3x 20.1xmedian 13.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 17.5x 23.5xmedian 17.5x 64.2xmedian 17.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 3.1x 11.7xmedian 3.1x -1.4xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median -0.57median 1.07 2.37median 1.07 -1.15median 1.07

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBLMNDRIDIN
Revenue $3.98B $13.37B $899.84M
Gross profit $2.79B $4.46B $355.26M
Operating income $47.65M $1.56B $24.72M
Net income $32.19M $1.18B $6.79M
Free cash flow $155.17M $1.03B $6.30M
EPS (diluted) $0.32 $10.33 $0.52
Cash & equivalents $66.61M $220.50M $97.50M
Total debt $702.79M $2.62B $1.19B
Shares (diluted) 86.22M 114.40M 12.10M
Enterprise value $512.17M $23.36B -$115.34M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBLMNDRIDIN
P/E 28.3x 20.5x 60.9x
P/FCF 5.0x 23.5x 64.2x
P/Operating cash flow 2.4x 13.5x 7.3x
P/S 0.2x 1.8x 0.4x
P/B 1.8x 11.7x -1.4x
P/Tangible book 66.8x 33.4x -0.5x
EV/EBITDA 5.7x 12.4x 20.1x
EV/EBIT 29.8x 17.0x 60.5x
EV/Revenue 0.4x 2.0x 1.7x
EV/FCF 9.1x 25.8x 237.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 4.4x 14.8x 26.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.57 2.37 -1.15

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBLMNDRIDIN
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.2% 8.1% 6.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.7% 7.5% 1.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.2% -32.7% -1.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.7% -7.5% -3.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) -57.4% 9.1% -58.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -45.7% 8.9% -36.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 2,049% 7.5% -85.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -49.9% 6.3% -55.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 648.7% 10.5% -82.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -50.0% 8.6% -52.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 36.1% 0.7% -48.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -11.4% 8.7% -18.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 305.4% -4.4% -93.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -8.3% 10.0% -51.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBLMNDRIDIN
Gross margin 70.1% 33.4% 39.5%
EBITDA margin 6.3% 16.0% 8.3%
Operating margin 1.2% 11.7% 2.7%
Pretax margin 0.0% 10.2% 1.1%
Net margin 0.7% 8.8% 0.7%
FCF margin 3.9% 7.7% 0.7%
Operating cash flow margin 8.0% 13.4% 6.2%
Return on equity 7.9% 55.3% –
Return on assets 1.1% 9.1% 0.4%
Return on invested capital 4.2% 32.9% 1.9%
Return on capital employed 2.1% 15.9% 1.8%
Asset turnover 1.3x 1.0x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 9.9x 1.5x 8.2x
Stock comp / revenue 0.3% 0.6% 1.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBLMNDRIDIN
Debt / assets 22.5% 19.8% 67.1%
Debt / equity 1.6x 1.3x -4.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.5x 1.1x 14.7x
Debt / FCF 4.5x 2.5x 188.8x
Liabilities / assets 86.0% 84.4% 116.5%
Equity / assets 14.0% 15.6% -16.5%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.3x 0.3x 0.9x
Quick ratio 0.1x 0.1x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 0.89 2.47 0.78

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBLMNDRIDIN
Dividend yield 0.0% 2.9% 2.4%
Net buyback yield – 2.8% 20.4%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 5.7% 22.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) 39.6% – 294.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) 8.2% – 317.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) -80.7% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -42.4% – -14.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBLMNDRIDIN
Forward P/E 9.9xFY2026 18.0xFY2026 7.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.92FY2026 $11.87FY2026 $4.51FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -18.6%FY2026 +11.6%FY2026 +1.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +16.3% +7.9% +10.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.75BFY2026 $14.53BFY2026 $924.09MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -5.4%FY2026 +10.0%FY2026 +5.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.2% -3.5% +1.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBLMNDRIDIN
Held by institutions 100.0% 97.6% 97.9%
Institutions holding 234 1,083 149
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.7% +1.9% +8.2%
Institutions buying 123 578 67
Institutions selling 76 325 53
Buyers to sellers 1.62 1.78 1.26

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BLMNDRIDIN
BLMN 1.00 0.52 0.45
DRI 0.52 1.00 0.51
DIN 0.45 0.51 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BLMN, DRI and DIN?

Darden Restaurants (DRI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) $776.02M, Darden Restaurants (DRI) $24.26B, Dine Brands Global (DIN) $382.56M.

Which stock is cheaper, BLMN, DRI and DIN?

Darden Restaurants (DRI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 28.1x, Darden Restaurants (DRI) 20.5x, Dine Brands Global (DIN) 60.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Dine Brands Global (DIN) is cheapest (Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 9.9x, Darden Restaurants (DRI) 18.0x, Dine Brands Global (DIN) 7.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Darden Restaurants (DRI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) +1.2%, Darden Restaurants (DRI) +8.1%, Dine Brands Global (DIN) +6.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Darden Restaurants (DRI) has the highest net margin (Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 0.7%, Darden Restaurants (DRI) 8.8%, Dine Brands Global (DIN) 0.7%). On return on invested capital, Darden Restaurants (DRI) leads (Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 4.2%, Darden Restaurants (DRI) 32.9%, Dine Brands Global (DIN) 1.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Darden Restaurants (DRI) returned the most: Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) +14.5%, Darden Restaurants (DRI) +15.4%, Dine Brands Global (DIN) +15.2%. Over five years, Darden Restaurants (DRI) compounded fastest (Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) -15.8%/yr, Darden Restaurants (DRI) +8.2%/yr, Dine Brands Global (DIN) -17.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Dine Brands Global (DIN) has the highest dividend yield: Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 0.02%, Darden Restaurants (DRI) 0.00%, Dine Brands Global (DIN) 0.05%. Darden Restaurants (DRI) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Darden Restaurants (DRI) has been the steadiest (Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 74.7%, Darden Restaurants (DRI) 27.9%, Dine Brands Global (DIN) 44.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BLMN, DRI and DIN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Darden Restaurants (DRI) leads on 10. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.