BLMN vs DIN vs RH Stock Comparison

Bloomin' Brands, Dine Brands Global and Rh Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BLMN Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
$9.08 +15.2% 1M +17.9% 1Y
Market cap
$777.38M
P/E
28.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.98B
Div. yield
–
Full-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
1 win
DIN Dine Brands Global, Inc.
$32.02 +13.6% 1M +19.1% 1Y
Market cap
$405.73M
P/E
61.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$899.84M
Div. yield
2.37%
Full-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
RH Rh
$140.79 +13.4% 1M -25.2% 1Y
Market cap
$2.67B
P/E
23.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.45B
Div. yield
–
Home Improvement Retail Consumer Discretionary
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Rh leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Rh 6, Dine Brands Global 4, Bloomin' Brands 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBLMNDINRHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $777.38M $405.73M $2.67B RH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.1x 61.0x 23.9x RH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 9.9x 7.1x 26.9x DIN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.2% +6.4% +3.3% DIN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.7% 0.7% 3.2% RH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.2% 1.9% 195.4% RH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.5x 14.7x -0.2x RH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 2.37% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +17.9% +19.1% -25.2% DIN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -15.7%/yr -17.5%/yr -26.6%/yr BLMN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 74.6% 44.4% 61.9% DIN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 42/100 20/100 47/100 RH

Percentile Scorecard

BLMNDINRH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBLMNDINRH
Valuation 86 #8 of 50 22 #39 of 50 66 #36 of 104
Growth 33 #32 of 47 0 #47 of 47 42 #58 of 99
Profitability 44 #26 of 46 27 #34 of 46 75 #25 of 98
Financial Health 18 #42 of 51 12 #45 of 51 41 #67 of 112
Shareholder Returns 28 #24 of 33 41 #20 of 33 10 #65 of 72
Overall 42 20 47
  • BLMN ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants
  • DIN ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants
  • RH ranked among 115 companies in Retail

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBLMNDINRHSPY
1 month +15.2%+13.6%+13.4% -0.2%
3 months +5.6%-11.2%-20.7% +3.9%
6 months +50.6%+16.1%+5.9% +8.2%
Year to date +47.2%-0.4%-21.4% +12.9%
1 year +17.9%+19.1%-25.2% +12.3%
3 years -60.9%-34.5%-33.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year -26.9%-13.1%-12.9% +23.3%
5 years -57.5%-61.8%-78.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year -15.7%-17.5%-26.6% +10.9%
10 years -46.3%-59.0%+399.6% +261.1%
10 years, per year -6.0%-8.5%+17.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBLMNDINRHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 74.6%44.4%61.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 63.3%43.4%59.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.190.541.95 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.240.43-0.41 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.3%-79.9%-83.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -23.4%-17.5%-39.5% -1.2%
52-week high $11.85$38.81$232.90 $779.14
52-week low $5.26$24.15$110.98 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBLMNDINRH
P/E now vs peer median 28.1xmedian 20.6x 61.0xmedian 20.6x 23.9xmedian 16.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 1.2x 0.5xmedian 1.2x 0.8xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.6xmedian 13.3x 20.2xmedian 13.3x 5.1xmedian 9.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 17.3x 64.4xmedian 17.3x 10.6xmedian 16.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 3.1x -1.4xmedian 3.1x 22.1xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median -0.56median 1.07 -1.16median 1.07 -0.90median 0.72

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBLMNDINRH
Revenue $3.98B $899.84M $3.45B
Gross profit $2.79B $355.26M $1.53B
Operating income $47.65M $24.72M $344.30M
Net income $32.19M $6.79M $111.51M
Free cash flow $155.17M $6.30M $250.50M
EPS (diluted) $0.32 $0.52 $5.67
Cash & equivalents $66.61M $97.50M $125.49M
Total debt $702.79M $1.19B $40.03M
Shares (diluted) 86.22M 12.10M 19.67M
Enterprise value $516.76M -$92.17M $2.40B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBLMNDINRH
P/E 28.1x 61.0x 23.9x
P/FCF 5.0x 64.4x 10.6x
P/Operating cash flow 2.4x 7.3x 6.3x
P/S 0.2x 0.5x 0.8x
P/B 1.8x -1.4x 22.1x
P/Tangible book 66.4x -0.5x 66.3x
EV/EBITDA 5.6x 20.2x 5.1x
EV/EBIT 29.7x 60.6x 7.5x
EV/Revenue 0.4x 1.7x 0.7x
EV/FCF 9.1x 237.7x 10.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 4.4x 26.8x 6.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.56 -1.16 -0.90

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBLMNDINRH
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.2% 6.4% 3.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.7% 1.4% 2.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.2% -1.6% 2.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.7% -3.1% 0.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -57.4% -58.8% -3.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -45.7% -36.1% -13.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 2,049% -85.3% 4.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -49.9% -55.7% -29.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 648.7% -82.6% 4.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -50.0% -52.8% -26.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 36.1% -48.9% 144.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -11.4% -18.3% -2.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 305.4% -93.2% 592.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -8.3% -51.9% -2.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBLMNDINRH
Gross margin 70.1% 39.5% 44.3%
EBITDA margin 6.3% 8.3% 14.6%
Operating margin 1.2% 2.7% 10.0%
Pretax margin 0.0% 1.1% 3.8%
Net margin 0.7% 0.7% 3.2%
FCF margin 3.9% 0.7% 7.3%
Operating cash flow margin 8.0% 6.2% 12.3%
Return on equity 7.9% – 108.1%
Return on assets 1.1% 0.4% 1.9%
Return on invested capital 4.2% 1.9% 195.4%
Return on capital employed 2.1% 1.8% 8.6%
Asset turnover 1.3x 0.5x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 9.9x 8.2x 3.8x
Stock comp / revenue 0.3% 1.6% 1.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBLMNDINRH
Debt / assets 22.5% 67.1% 0.8%
Debt / equity 1.6x -4.1x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.5x 14.7x -0.2x
Debt / FCF 4.5x 188.8x 0.2x
Liabilities / assets 86.0% 116.5% 97.7%
Equity / assets 14.0% -16.5% 2.3%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.3x 0.9x 1.1x
Quick ratio 0.1x 0.6x 0.2x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.3x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 0.89 0.78 1.15

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBLMNDINRH
Dividend yield 0.0% 2.4% –
Net buyback yield – 20.3% -0.3%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 22.7% -0.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) 39.6% 294.6% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 8.2% 317.5% –
Dividend growth (1Y) -80.7% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -42.4% -14.6% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBLMNDINRH
Forward P/E 9.9xFY2026 7.1xFY2026 26.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.92FY2026 $4.51FY2026 $5.24FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -18.6%FY2026 +1.3%FY2026 -16.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +16.3% +10.9% +71.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.75BFY2026 $924.09MFY2026 $3.85BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -5.4%FY2026 +5.1%FY2026 +11.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.2% +1.6% +0.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBLMNDINRH
Held by institutions 100.0% 97.9% 100.0%
Institutions holding 234 149 374
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.7% +8.2% +6.4%
Institutions buying 123 67 209
Institutions selling 76 53 115
Buyers to sellers 1.62 1.26 1.82

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BLMNDINRH
BLMN 1.00 0.45 0.34
DIN 0.45 1.00 0.23
RH 0.34 0.23 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BLMN, DIN and RH?

Rh (RH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) $777.38M, Dine Brands Global (DIN) $405.73M, Rh (RH) $2.67B.

Which stock is cheaper, BLMN, DIN and RH?

Rh (RH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 28.1x, Dine Brands Global (DIN) 61.0x, Rh (RH) 23.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Dine Brands Global (DIN) is cheapest (Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 9.9x, Dine Brands Global (DIN) 7.1x, Rh (RH) 26.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Dine Brands Global (DIN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) +1.2%, Dine Brands Global (DIN) +6.4%, Rh (RH) +3.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Rh (RH) has the highest net margin (Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 0.7%, Dine Brands Global (DIN) 0.7%, Rh (RH) 3.2%). On return on invested capital, Rh (RH) leads (Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 4.2%, Dine Brands Global (DIN) 1.9%, Rh (RH) 195.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Dine Brands Global (DIN) returned the most: Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) +17.9%, Dine Brands Global (DIN) +19.1%, Rh (RH) -25.2%. Over five years, Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) compounded fastest (Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) -15.7%/yr, Dine Brands Global (DIN) -17.5%/yr, Rh (RH) -26.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 0.00%, Dine Brands Global (DIN) 2.37%. Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) and Rh (RH) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Dine Brands Global (DIN) has been the steadiest (Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 74.6%, Dine Brands Global (DIN) 44.4%, Rh (RH) 61.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BLMN, DIN and RH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Rh (RH) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.