BKR vs WFRD vs TDW Stock Comparison

Baker Hughes, Weatherford International and Tidewater Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BKR Baker Hughes Co
$56.01 -3.1% 1M +18.4% 1Y
Market cap
$55.60B
P/E
17.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$27.73B
Div. yield
1.64%
Oilfield Services Energy
4 wins
TDW Tidewater Inc
$84.50 -0.3% 1M +71.4% 1Y
Market cap
$4.20B
P/E
17.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.35B
Div. yield
–
Oilfield Services Energy
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Tidewater leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Tidewater 5, Baker Hughes 4, Weatherford International 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBKRWFRDTDWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $55.60B $6.42B $4.20B BKR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 17.9x 15.7x 17.0x WFRD
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 22.4x 19.2x 29.3x WFRD
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.4% -5.7% -1.0% BKR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.2% 8.6% 18.3% TDW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.9% 16.4% 12.2% WFRD
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.1x 0.4x 0.1x TDW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.64% 1.22% 0.00% BKR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +18.4% +25.9% +71.4% TDW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +17.5%/yr +26.6%/yr +45.9%/yr TDW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 33.2% 41.7% 48.6% BKR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 68/100 76/100 TDW

Percentile Scorecard

BKRWFRDTDW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBKRWFRDTDW
Valuation 44 #27 of 47 65 #17 of 47 41 #28 of 47
Growth 67 #15 of 44 49 #23 of 44 79 #10 of 44
Profitability 75 #11 of 41 93 #4 of 41 98 #2 of 41
Financial Health 49 #24 of 46 51 #23 of 46 84 #8 of 46
Shareholder Returns 42 #19 of 32 81 #7 of 32 –
Overall 55 68 76
  • BKR ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment
  • WFRD ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment
  • TDW ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBKRWFRDTDWSPY
1 month -3.1%+4.1%-0.3% -0.8%
3 months -7.6%+3.1%+7.5% +3.5%
6 months -18.1%-19.2%-7.3% +7.0%
Year to date +23.0%+13.2%+67.3% +12.2%
1 year +18.4%+25.9%+71.4% +13.0%
3 years +60.9%-5.1%+23.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year +17.2%-1.7%+7.2% +23.1%
5 years +124.0%+225.0%+560.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year +17.5%+26.6%+45.9% +11.0%
10 years ——+48.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year ——+4.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBKRWFRDTDWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 33.2%41.7%48.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.2%38.7%46.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.681.230.51 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.550.621.47 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -47.2%-70.8%-70.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.6%-20.5%-16.0% -1.8%
52-week high $69.67$111.42$100.61 $779.14
52-week low $44.47$69.97$48.67 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBKRWFRDTDW
P/E now vs peer median 17.9xmedian 25.5x 15.7xmedian 25.5x 17.0xmedian 25.5x
P/S now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 1.2x 1.4xmedian 1.2x 3.1xmedian 1.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.5xmedian 8.6x 7.8xmedian 8.6x 8.3xmedian 8.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 17.8xmedian 14.7x 11.1xmedian 14.7x 15.5xmedian 14.7x
P/B now vs peer median 2.8xmedian 1.6x 3.2xmedian 1.6x 3.0xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median 0.45median 0.41 2.64median 0.41 0.23median 0.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBKRWFRDTDW
Revenue $27.73B $4.69B $1.35B
Gross profit $6.58B $1.44B $651.24M
Operating income $3.59B $582.00M $248.14M
Net income $3.12B $415.00M $245.49M
Free cash flow $3.13B $579.00M $271.18M
R&D $569.00M $86.00M –
EPS (diluted) $3.11 $5.61 $4.93
Cash & equivalents $15.73B $1.16B $613.54M
Total debt $16.25B $1.48B $653.20M
Shares (diluted) 997.00M 72.20M 50.13M
Enterprise value $18.88B $2.20B $2.03B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBKRWFRDTDW
P/E 17.9x 15.7x 17.0x
P/FCF 17.8x 11.1x 15.5x
P/Operating cash flow 12.5x 8.3x 13.5x
P/S 2.0x 1.4x 3.1x
P/B 2.8x 3.2x 3.0x
P/Tangible book 3.5x 3.8x 3.0x
EV/EBITDA 11.5x 7.8x 8.3x
EV/EBIT 15.7x 11.6x 17.1x
EV/Revenue 2.0x 1.4x 3.2x
EV/FCF 17.9x 11.6x 15.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.7x 8.7x 13.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.45 2.64 0.23

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBKRWFRDTDW
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.4% -5.7% -1.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.0% -2.0% 19.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -0.9% -7.7% -4.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 5.8% -4.9% 26.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.7% -22.9% -19.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 23.9% -9.0% 37.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 1.3% -6.1% 24.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 39.1% 1.3% 72.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 1.0% 0.0% 23.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 39.9% 6.0% 73.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 29.7% 17.4% 2.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 16.4% 5.9% 48.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 44.5% 51.6% -2.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 21.8% 8.0% 59.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBKRWFRDTDW
Gross margin 23.7% 30.8% 48.4%
EBITDA margin 17.6% 18.5% 38.2%
Operating margin 12.9% 12.4% 18.4%
Pretax margin 12.7% 9.3% 11.9%
Net margin 11.2% 8.6% 18.3%
FCF margin 11.3% 12.3% 20.1%
Operating cash flow margin 16.0% 16.4% 23.1%
Return on equity 15.8% 22.0% 17.8%
Return on assets 6.0% 8.0% 10.4%
Return on invested capital 8.9% 16.4% 12.2%
Return on capital employed 9.7% 16.4% 11.9%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.9x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 1.9x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 1.1% 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBKRWFRDTDW
Debt / assets 30.9% 27.7% 27.6%
Debt / equity 0.8x 0.7x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.1x 0.4x 0.1x
Debt / FCF 5.2x 2.6x 2.4x
Liabilities / assets 61.8% 62.7% 41.1%
Equity / assets 38.2% 37.3% 58.9%
Interest coverage – – 3.7x
Current ratio 2.1x 2.0x 3.6x
Quick ratio 1.7x 1.4x 3.4x
Cash ratio 1.1x 0.7x 2.3x
Altman Z-score 2.10 2.54 3.70

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBKRWFRDTDW
Dividend yield 1.6% 1.2% –
Net buyback yield – 0.9% –
Shareholder yield 1.6% 2.2% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 29.1% 18.6% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 29.1% 13.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 4.2% 6.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 6.4% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBKRWFRDTDW
Forward P/E 22.4xFY2026 19.2xFY2026 29.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.50FY2026 $4.62FY2026 $2.88FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -3.8%FY2026 -29.4%FY2026 -56.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.0% +52.8% +111.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $30.78BFY2026 $4.77BFY2026 $1.50BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +11.0%FY2026 -3.1%FY2026 +10.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -2.3% +8.3% +7.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBKRWFRDTDW
Held by institutions 97.2% 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 1,148 428 363
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.2% +5.1% +9.4%
Institutions buying 576 217 183
Institutions selling 429 143 123
Buyers to sellers 1.34 1.52 1.49

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BKRWFRDTDW
BKR 1.00 0.62 0.47
WFRD 0.62 1.00 0.45
TDW 0.47 0.45 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BKR, WFRD and TDW?

Baker Hughes (BKR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Baker Hughes (BKR) $55.60B, Weatherford International (WFRD) $6.42B, Tidewater (TDW) $4.20B.

Which stock is cheaper, BKR, WFRD and TDW?

Weatherford International (WFRD) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Baker Hughes (BKR) 17.9x, Weatherford International (WFRD) 15.7x, Tidewater (TDW) 17.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Weatherford International (WFRD) is cheapest (Baker Hughes (BKR) 22.4x, Weatherford International (WFRD) 19.2x, Tidewater (TDW) 29.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Baker Hughes (BKR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Baker Hughes (BKR) +0.4%, Weatherford International (WFRD) -5.7%, Tidewater (TDW) -1.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Tidewater (TDW) has the highest net margin (Baker Hughes (BKR) 11.2%, Weatherford International (WFRD) 8.6%, Tidewater (TDW) 18.3%). On return on invested capital, Weatherford International (WFRD) leads (Baker Hughes (BKR) 8.9%, Weatherford International (WFRD) 16.4%, Tidewater (TDW) 12.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Tidewater (TDW) returned the most: Baker Hughes (BKR) +18.4%, Weatherford International (WFRD) +25.9%, Tidewater (TDW) +71.4%. Over five years, Tidewater (TDW) compounded fastest (Baker Hughes (BKR) +17.5%/yr, Weatherford International (WFRD) +26.6%/yr, Tidewater (TDW) +45.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Baker Hughes (BKR) has the highest dividend yield: Baker Hughes (BKR) 1.64%, Weatherford International (WFRD) 1.22%, Tidewater (TDW) 0.00%. Tidewater (TDW) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Baker Hughes (BKR) has been the steadiest (Baker Hughes (BKR) 33.2%, Weatherford International (WFRD) 41.7%, Tidewater (TDW) 48.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BKR, WFRD and TDW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Tidewater (TDW) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.