BKR vs EFXT vs USAC Stock Comparison

Baker Hughes, Enerflex and USA Compression Partners Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BKR Baker Hughes Co
$56.01 -3.1% 1M +18.4% 1Y
Market cap
$57.08B
P/E
18.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$27.73B
Div. yield
0.02%
Oilfield Services Energy
3 wins
EFXT Enerflex Ltd.
$23.44 -0.6% 1M +88.1% 1Y
Market cap
$2.93B
P/E
48.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.21B
Div. yield
–
Oilfield Equipment Energy
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

USA Compression Partners leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (USA Compression Partners 5, Enerflex 4, Baker Hughes 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBKREFXTUSACLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $57.08B $2.93B $3.61B BKR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.4x 48.0x 25.0x BKR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 22.1x 18.5x 20.2x EFXT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.4% — +19.9% USAC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.2% 2.8% 12.3% USAC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.9% 8.8% 9.9% USAC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.1x 0.7x 4.3x BKR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.00% 0.08% USAC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +18.4% +88.1% +8.5% EFXT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +17.5%/yr +22.3%/yr +9.5%/yr EFXT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 33.2% 49.2% 28.1% USAC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 63/100 57/100 EFXT

Percentile Scorecard

BKREFXTUSAC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBKREFXTUSAC
Valuation 44 #27 of 47 74 #13 of 47 33 #32 of 47
Growth 67 #15 of 44 93 #4 of 44 95 #3 of 44
Profitability 75 #11 of 41 88 #6 of 41 100 #1 of 41
Financial Health 49 #24 of 46 36 #30 of 46 9 #42 of 46
Shareholder Returns 42 #19 of 32 26 #24 of 32 48 #17 of 32
Overall 55 63 57
  • BKR ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment
  • EFXT ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment
  • USAC ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBKREFXTUSACSPY
1 month -3.1%-0.6%-2.2% -0.8%
3 months -7.6%+4.2%-2.8% +3.5%
6 months -18.1%-8.3%-6.7% +7.0%
Year to date +23.0%+51.9%+8.7% +12.2%
1 year +18.4%+88.1%+8.5% +13.0%
3 years +60.9%+477.3%+0.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year +17.2%+79.5%+0.3% +23.1%
5 years +124.0%+172.9%+57.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year +17.5%+22.3%+9.5% +11.0%
10 years —+112.1%+31.9% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+7.8%+2.8% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBKREFXTUSACSPY
Volatility, 1Y 33.2%49.2%28.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.2%47.8%28.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.680.870.09 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.551.790.30 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -47.2%-56.6%-25.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.6%-17.4%-17.5% -1.8%
52-week high $69.67$28.39$30.30 $779.14
52-week low $44.47$12.53$21.99 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBKREFXTUSAC
P/E now vs peer median 17.9xmedian 25.5x 47.2xmedian 25.5x 25.1xmedian 25.5x
P/S now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 1.2x 1.3xmedian 1.2x 3.1xmedian 1.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.5xmedian 8.6x 5.1xmedian 8.6x 9.6xmedian 8.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 17.8xmedian 14.7x 6.4xmedian 14.7x 11.7xmedian 14.7x
P/B now vs peer median 2.8xmedian 1.6x 2.4xmedian 1.6x 12.6xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median 0.45median 0.41 1.25median 0.41 0.13median 0.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBKREFXTUSAC
Revenue $27.73B $2.21B $1.18B
Gross profit $6.58B $525.36M $772.78M
Operating income $3.59B $206.78M $352.30M
Net income $3.12B $185.99M $146.24M
Free cash flow $3.13B $444.07M $309.81M
R&D $569.00M – –
EPS (diluted) $3.11 $0.50 $0.99
Cash & equivalents $15.73B $74.00M $9.48M
Total debt $16.25B $2.40B $2.94B
Shares (diluted) 997.00M 123.06M 145.62M
Enterprise value $20.18B $2.61B $3.58B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBKREFXTUSAC
P/E 17.9x 47.2x 25.1x
P/FCF 17.8x 6.4x 11.7x
P/Operating cash flow 12.5x 6.8x 8.1x
P/S 2.0x 1.3x 3.1x
P/B 2.8x 2.4x 12.6x
P/Tangible book 3.5x 2.5x 32.8x
EV/EBITDA 11.5x 5.1x 9.6x
EV/EBIT 15.7x 16.0x 18.6x
EV/Revenue 2.0x 1.5x 5.6x
EV/FCF 17.9x 7.5x 21.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.7x 7.9x 14.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.45 1.25 0.13

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBKREFXTUSAC
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.4% – 19.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.0% 9.3% 15.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -0.9% – 18.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 5.8% 17.6% 14.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.7% – 18.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 23.9% 84.6% 21.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 1.3% – 55.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 39.1% 65.2% 40.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 1.0% -46.0% 50.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 39.9% 37.7% 197.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 29.7% – 25.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 16.4% 243.8% 19.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 44.5% – 19.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 21.8% 219.7% 68.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBKREFXTUSAC
Gross margin 23.7% 23.8% 65.7%
EBITDA margin 17.6% 29.5% 57.8%
Operating margin 12.9% 9.4% 30.0%
Pretax margin 12.7% 14.8% 13.5%
Net margin 11.2% 2.8% 12.3%
FCF margin 11.3% 20.1% 26.3%
Operating cash flow margin 16.0% 19.0% 38.0%
Return on equity 15.8% 10.3% 48.4%
Return on assets 6.0% 4.2% 3.9%
Return on invested capital 8.9% 8.8% 9.9%
Return on capital employed 9.7% 11.5% 10.2%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.8x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 2.3x 3.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 1.3% 0.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBKREFXTUSAC
Debt / assets 30.9% 18.9% 79.8%
Debt / equity 0.8x 0.5x 10.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.1x 0.7x 4.3x
Debt / FCF 5.2x 1.2x 9.5x
Liabilities / assets 61.8% 58.3% 92.2%
Equity / assets 38.2% 41.7% 7.8%
Interest coverage – 0.2x 1.8x
Current ratio 2.1x 1.2x 1.3x
Quick ratio 1.7x 0.6x 0.6x
Cash ratio 1.1x 0.1x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 2.10 2.26 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBKREFXTUSAC
Dividend yield 1.6% 0.7% 10.6%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 1.6% 0.7% 10.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) 29.1% – 189.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) 29.1% – 89.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) 4.2% – 4.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 6.4% – 2.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBKREFXTUSAC
Forward P/E 22.1xFY2026 18.5xFY2026 20.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.54FY2026 $1.27FY2026 $1.24FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -2.3%FY2026 +144.2%FY2026 +45.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +10.6% +37.8% +24.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $30.90BFY2026 $2.39BFY2026 $1.46BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +11.4%FY2026 -7.1%FY2026 +46.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -1.5% +7.6% -3.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBKREFXTUSAC
Held by institutions 97.2% 66.5% 37.0%
Institutions holding 1,148 167 130
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.2% -1.1% +0.4%
Institutions buying 576 85 63
Institutions selling 429 63 26
Buyers to sellers 1.34 1.35 2.42

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BKREFXTUSAC
BKR 1.00 0.38 0.33
EFXT 0.38 1.00 0.28
USAC 0.33 0.28 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BKR, EFXT and USAC?

Baker Hughes (BKR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Baker Hughes (BKR) $57.08B, Enerflex (EFXT) $2.93B, USA Compression Partners (USAC) $3.61B.

Which stock is cheaper, BKR, EFXT and USAC?

Baker Hughes (BKR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Baker Hughes (BKR) 18.4x, Enerflex (EFXT) 48.0x, USA Compression Partners (USAC) 25.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Enerflex (EFXT) is cheapest (Baker Hughes (BKR) 22.1x, Enerflex (EFXT) 18.5x, USA Compression Partners (USAC) 20.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

USA Compression Partners (USAC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Baker Hughes (BKR) +0.4%, USA Compression Partners (USAC) +19.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

USA Compression Partners (USAC) has the highest net margin (Baker Hughes (BKR) 11.2%, Enerflex (EFXT) 2.8%, USA Compression Partners (USAC) 12.3%). On return on invested capital, USA Compression Partners (USAC) leads (Baker Hughes (BKR) 8.9%, Enerflex (EFXT) 8.8%, USA Compression Partners (USAC) 9.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Enerflex (EFXT) returned the most: Baker Hughes (BKR) +18.4%, Enerflex (EFXT) +88.1%, USA Compression Partners (USAC) +8.5%. Over five years, Enerflex (EFXT) compounded fastest (Baker Hughes (BKR) +17.5%/yr, Enerflex (EFXT) +22.3%/yr, USA Compression Partners (USAC) +9.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

USA Compression Partners (USAC) has the highest dividend yield: Baker Hughes (BKR) 0.02%, Enerflex (EFXT) 0.00%, USA Compression Partners (USAC) 0.08%. Enerflex (EFXT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, USA Compression Partners (USAC) has been the steadiest (Baker Hughes (BKR) 33.2%, Enerflex (EFXT) 49.2%, USA Compression Partners (USAC) 28.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BKR, EFXT and USAC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, USA Compression Partners (USAC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.