BIYA vs BZ vs ZM Stock Comparison

Baiya International, Kanzhun and Zoom Communications Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BZ Kanzhun Ltd
$16.28 +14.9% 1M -27.6% 1Y
Market cap
$7.44B
P/E
11.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.25B
Div. yield
–
HR Software Technology
5 wins
ZM Zoom Communications, Inc.
$97.66 +10.5% 1M +17.2% 1Y
Market cap
$27.89B
P/E
8.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.97B
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Kanzhun leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Kanzhun 5, Zoom Communications 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBIYABZZMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $234.70K $7.44B $27.89B ZM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 11.2x 8.7x ZM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 12.1x 15.1x BZ
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +51.0% +4.6% BZ
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 53.2% 64.1% ZM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -83.8% -27.6% +17.2% ZM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -14.3%/yr -18.7%/yr BZ
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 334.2% 39.6% 44.8% BZ
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 87/100 80/100 BZ

Percentile Scorecard

BIYABZZM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBIYABZZM
Valuation – 91 #10 of 101 71 #9 of 29
Growth – 96 #5 of 97 69 #9 of 27
Profitability – 95 #6 of 93 84 #5 of 26
Financial Health 85 #19 of 122 96 #5 of 108 97 #2 of 31
Shareholder Returns – 60 #26 of 63 –
Overall – 87 80
  • BIYA ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • BZ ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • ZM ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBIYABZZMSPY
1 month -40.0%+14.9%+10.5% +0.7%
3 months -65.9%-0.7%+5.8% +3.7%
6 months -37.9%+20.4%+0.5% +7.1%
Year to date -68.2%-20.1%+13.2% +12.8%
1 year -83.8%-27.6%+17.2% +11.9%
3 years —+7.2%+62.8% +85.2%
3 years, per year —+2.3%+17.6% +22.8%
5 years —-53.6%-64.4% +67.6%
5 years, per year —-14.3%-18.7% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureBIYABZZMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 334.2%39.6%44.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 181.6%38.7%42.7% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -3.220.651.04 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.25-0.700.38 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.8%-73.6%-80.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -89.7%-28.0%-12.7% -1.2%
52-week high $11.96$22.60$111.88 $779.14
52-week low $0.28$12.65$72.72 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBIYABZZM
P/E now vs peer median —median 21.9x 11.0xmedian 28.0x 9.0xmedian 33.1x
P/S now vs peer median —median 0.9x 6.0xmedian 2.8x 5.7xmedian 2.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 11.9x —median 16.9x 13.9xmedian 9.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 14.4x 11.4xmedian 15.9x —median 15.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 2.4x 2.4xmedian 3.2x 2.5xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.97 0.08median 0.89 0.05median 0.74

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBIYABZZM
Revenue – $1.25B $4.97B
Gross profit – $1.21B $3.84B
Operating income – $412.25M $1.20B
Net income – $657.32M $3.19B
Free cash flow – $665.92M –
R&D – $58.24M $881.96M
EPS (diluted) – $1.44 $10.64
Cash & equivalents $1.18M $380.29M $931.99M
Shares (diluted) 189.28K 463.50M 299.75M
Enterprise value -$4.11M -$883.52M -$2.89B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBIYABZZM
P/E – 11.0x 9.0x
P/FCF – 11.4x –
P/Operating cash flow – 11.4x –
P/S – 6.0x 5.7x
P/B 0.0x 2.4x 2.5x
P/Tangible book 0.0x 2.5x 2.5x
EV/EBITDA – – 13.9x
EV/EBIT – 12.8x 17.8x
EV/Revenue – 4.2x 4.3x
EV/FCF – 7.9x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 7.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.08 0.05

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBIYABZZM
Revenue growth (1Y) – 51.0% 4.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 20.9% 3.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 21.2% 5.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 22.9% 4.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 64.4% 23.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 236.9% 112.9%
Net income growth (1Y) – 121.6% 168.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 132.3% 182.3%
EPS growth (1Y) – 118.2% 175.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 131.7% 184.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 25.2% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 37.2% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 24.1% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 41.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBIYABZZM
Gross margin – 96.5% 77.2%
EBITDA margin – – 30.9%
Operating margin – 32.9% 24.1%
Pretax margin – 66.1% 82.5%
Net margin – 53.2% 64.1%
FCF margin – 53.1% –
Operating cash flow margin – 53.1% –
Return on equity – 21.6% 30.2%
Return on assets – 17.1% 25.0%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – 13.4% 11.2%
Asset turnover – 0.3x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.0x –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBIYABZZM
Debt / assets – – –
Debt / equity – – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 7.7% 21.7% 16.8%
Equity / assets 92.3% 78.3% 83.2%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 12.5x 4.2x 3.8x
Quick ratio 1.0x 3.1x 3.7x
Cash ratio 0.5x 3.0x 3.4x
Altman Z-score – – 9.48

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBIYABZZM
Dividend yield – 3.1% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 3.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBIYABZZM
Forward P/E – 12.1xFY2026 15.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $1.34FY2026 $6.45FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +18.6%FY2026 +9.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +3.0% +2.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.42BFY2026 $4.76BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +20.7%FY2026 -2.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +7.0% +8.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBIYABZZM
Held by institutions – 66.1% 67.2%
Institutions holding – 254 863
Change in shares held, QoQ – -1.6% +2.9%
Institutions buying – 129 478
Institutions selling – 94 279
Buyers to sellers – 1.37 1.71

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BIYABZZM
BIYA 1.00 0.00 0.07
BZ 0.00 1.00 0.12
ZM 0.07 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BIYA, BZ and ZM?

Zoom Communications (ZM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Baiya International (BIYA) $234.70K, Kanzhun (BZ) $7.44B, Zoom Communications (ZM) $27.89B.

Which stock is cheaper, BIYA, BZ and ZM?

Zoom Communications (ZM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Kanzhun (BZ) 11.2x, Zoom Communications (ZM) 8.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kanzhun (BZ) is cheapest (Kanzhun (BZ) 12.1x, Zoom Communications (ZM) 15.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Kanzhun (BZ) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Kanzhun (BZ) +51.0%, Zoom Communications (ZM) +4.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Zoom Communications (ZM) has the highest net margin (Kanzhun (BZ) 53.2%, Zoom Communications (ZM) 64.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Zoom Communications (ZM) returned the most: Baiya International (BIYA) -83.8%, Kanzhun (BZ) -27.6%, Zoom Communications (ZM) +17.2%. Over five years, Kanzhun (BZ) compounded fastest (Kanzhun (BZ) -14.3%/yr, Zoom Communications (ZM) -18.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kanzhun (BZ) has been the steadiest (Baiya International (BIYA) 334.2%, Kanzhun (BZ) 39.6%, Zoom Communications (ZM) 44.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BIYA, BZ and ZM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kanzhun (BZ) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.