BIPH vs OMAB Stock Comparison

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners and Central North Airport Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Brookfield Infrastructure Partners 3, Central North Airport 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBIPHOMABLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.62B $4.78B BIPH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -25.7x 16.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 25.7x 14.6x OMAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +16.4% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1.5% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.6% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 6.1x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.18% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -11.3% -3.8% OMAB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -10.1%/yr +14.6%/yr OMAB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 13.9% 31.1% BIPH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 44/100 BIPH

Percentile Scorecard

BIPHOMAB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBIPHOMAB
Valuation 65 #48 of 136 28 #98 of 136
Growth 87 #17 of 122 –
Profitability 39 #73 of 119 –
Financial Health 13 #128 of 147 34 #97 of 147
Shareholder Returns 35 #55 of 84 70 #26 of 84
Overall 48 44
  • BIPH ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBIPHOMABSPY
1 month -2.0%-2.7% -1.0%
3 months -6.4%-4.7% +2.9%
6 months -8.2%-15.4% +6.4%
Year to date -6.8%-9.4% +11.4%
1 year -11.3%-3.8% +13.1%
3 years -1.2%+53.7% +79.4%
3 years, per year -0.4%+15.4% +21.5%
5 years -41.1%+97.2% +67.7%
5 years, per year -10.1%+14.6% +10.9%
10 years —+101.2% +255.2%
10 years, per year —+7.2% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureBIPHOMABSPY
Volatility, 1Y 13.9%31.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 15.7%28.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.101.11 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.81-0.12 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.5%-42.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.8%-27.0% -2.5%
52-week high $17.40$134.98 $779.14
52-week low $15.08$88.75 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBIPHOMAB
P/E now vs peer median -25.6xmedian 16.0x 16.0xmedian 16.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 1.0x 5.4xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.0xmedian 8.7x —median 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -12.1xmedian 11.5x 11.8xmedian 11.5x
P/B now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 1.2x 7.5xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.82 —median 0.82

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBIPHOMAB
Revenue $25.06B –
Gross profit $6.65B –
Operating income $6.20B –
Net income $2.39B –
Free cash flow -$792.00M –
Cash & equivalents $3.09B $172.32M
Total debt $67.76B $1.84B
Enterprise value -$3.95B $4.26B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBIPHOMAB
P/E -25.6x 16.0x
P/FCF -12.1x 11.8x
P/Operating cash flow 1.5x –
P/S 0.4x 5.4x
P/B 0.3x 7.5x
P/Tangible book 0.5x -9.6x
EV/EBITDA 7.0x –
EV/EBIT 11.9x –
EV/Revenue 2.9x –
EV/FCF -93.2x –
EV/Operating cash flow 11.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBIPHOMAB
Revenue growth (1Y) 16.4% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 16.6% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 16.9% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 48.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 17.8% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 28.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) 63.4% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 15.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 30.9% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 26.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 72.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.5% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBIPHOMAB
Gross margin 26.5% –
EBITDA margin 41.9% –
Operating margin 24.8% –
Pretax margin 11.8% –
Net margin -1.5% –
FCF margin -3.2% –
Operating cash flow margin 25.1% –
Return on equity 7.2% –
Return on assets 1.9% –
Return on invested capital 6.6% –
Return on capital employed 5.6% –
Asset turnover 0.2x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.6x –
Stock comp / revenue – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBIPHOMAB
Debt / assets 55.6% 43.4%
Debt / equity 2.1x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 6.1x –
Debt / FCF -85.6x –
Liabilities / assets 73.3% 63.1%
Equity / assets 26.7% 36.9%
Interest coverage 1.1x –
Current ratio 0.9x 1.3x
Quick ratio 0.7x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.7x
Altman Z-score – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBIPHOMAB
Dividend yield 0.0% 5.5%
Net buyback yield – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 5.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) 71.4% –
Payout ratio (FCF) -215.5% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 10.5% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 40.3% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBIPHOMAB
Forward P/E 25.7xFY2026 14.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.59FY2026 $6.73FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -34.4%FY2026 +5.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +88.1% +29.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $17.63BFY2026 $942.26MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -23.7%FY2026 +2.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -44.6% +20.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBIPHOMAB
Held by institutions – 12.3%
Institutions holding – 163
Change in shares held, QoQ – +5.4%
Institutions buying – 77
Institutions selling – 59
Buyers to sellers – 1.31

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BIPHOMAB
BIPH 1.00 0.12
OMAB 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BIPH and OMAB?

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) $9.62B, Central North Airport (OMAB) $4.78B.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Central North Airport (OMAB) returned the most: Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) -11.3%, Central North Airport (OMAB) -3.8%. Over five years, Central North Airport (OMAB) compounded fastest (Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) -10.1%/yr, Central North Airport (OMAB) +14.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) 0.18%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 0.00%. Central North Airport (OMAB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) has been the steadiest (Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) 13.9%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do BIPH and OMAB move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.12, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, BIPH and OMAB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.