BIPH vs OMAB vs XHR Stock Comparison

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners, Central North Airport and Xenia Hotels & Resorts Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Brookfield Infrastructure Partners 5, Xenia Hotels & Resorts 4, Central North Airport 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBIPHOMABXHRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.59B $4.78B $1.87B BIPH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -25.6x 16.1x -258.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 25.8x 15.0x — OMAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +16.4% — +1.6% BIPH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1.5% — -0.7% XHR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.6% — 2.9% BIPH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 6.1x — 6.0x XHR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.18% 0.00% 0.00% BIPH
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -11.3% -3.6% +52.1% XHR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -9.9%/yr +15.2%/yr +2.4%/yr OMAB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 13.9% 31.2% 27.3% BIPH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 46/100 47/100 XHR

Percentile Scorecard

BIPHOMABXHR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBIPHOMABXHR
Valuation 64 #50 of 136 28 #98 of 136 74 #39 of 145
Growth 87 #17 of 122 – 20 #114 of 142
Profitability 38 #72 of 116 – 32 #93 of 136
Financial Health 13 #126 of 144 34 #95 of 144 41 #82 of 139
Shareholder Returns 31 #57 of 82 74 #22 of 82 69 #42 of 131
Overall 46 46 47
  • BIPH ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • XHR ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBIPHOMABXHRSPY
1 month -1.3%-3.9%+9.2% -0.8%
3 months -6.0%-5.5%-8.3% +3.5%
6 months -8.1%-10.9%+23.4% +7.0%
Year to date -6.5%-9.0%+40.3% +12.2%
1 year -11.3%-3.6%+52.1% +13.0%
3 years +2.9%+74.4%+76.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year +1.0%+20.4%+20.8% +23.1%
5 years -40.7%+102.8%+12.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year -9.9%+15.2%+2.4% +11.0%
10 years —+104.2%+27.6% +258.0%
10 years, per year —+7.4%+2.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBIPHOMABXHRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 13.9%31.2%27.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 15.7%28.1%28.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.101.120.53 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.81-0.121.91 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.5%-42.1%-54.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.5%-26.7%-9.1% -1.8%
52-week high $17.40$134.98$21.82 $779.14
52-week low $15.08$88.75$12.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBIPHOMABXHR
P/E now vs peer median -25.7xmedian 16.1x 16.1xmedian 16.1x -253.4xmedian 27.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 1.0x 5.4xmedian 1.0x 1.7xmedian 4.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.0xmedian 8.7x —median 8.7x 14.9xmedian 14.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -12.1xmedian 11.5x 11.8xmedian 11.5x 15.8xmedian 23.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 1.2x 7.5xmedian 1.2x 1.6xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.81 —median 0.81 8.66median 2.11

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBIPHOMABXHR
Revenue $25.06B – $1.09B
Gross profit $6.65B – $337.00M
Operating income $6.20B – $73.11M
Net income $2.39B – -$7.69M
Free cash flow -$792.00M – $115.51M
EPS (diluted) – – $-0.08
Cash & equivalents $3.09B $172.32M $112.36M
Total debt $67.76B $1.84B $1.36B
Shares (diluted) – – 92.25M
Enterprise value -$3.98B $4.27B $1.33B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBIPHOMABXHR
P/E -25.7x 16.1x -253.4x
P/FCF -12.1x 11.8x 15.8x
P/Operating cash flow 1.5x – 10.1x
P/S 0.4x 5.4x 1.7x
P/B 0.3x 7.5x 1.6x
P/Tangible book 0.5x -9.6x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 7.0x – 14.9x
EV/EBIT 11.9x – 42.1x
EV/Revenue 2.9x – 2.8x
EV/FCF -93.3x – 26.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.7x – 16.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 8.66

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBIPHOMABXHR
Revenue growth (1Y) 16.4% – 1.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 16.6% – 1.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 16.9% – 3.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 48.1% – 0.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 17.8% – -30.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 28.4% – -13.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 63.4% – -111.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 15.0% – -28.8%
EPS growth (1Y) – – -112.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – -29.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 30.9% – 5.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 26.0% – -1.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 72.5% – 356.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.5% – 2.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBIPHOMABXHR
Gross margin 26.5% – 30.8%
EBITDA margin 41.9% – 18.9%
Operating margin 24.8% – 6.7%
Pretax margin 11.8% – -0.6%
Net margin -1.5% – -0.7%
FCF margin -3.2% – 10.6%
Operating cash flow margin 25.1% – 16.6%
Return on equity 7.2% – -0.7%
Return on assets 1.9% – -0.3%
Return on invested capital 6.6% – 2.9%
Return on capital employed 5.6% – –
Asset turnover 0.2x – 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.6x – -23.7x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBIPHOMABXHR
Debt / assets 55.6% 43.4% 50.0%
Debt / equity 2.1x 1.2x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 6.1x – 6.0x
Debt / FCF -85.6x – 11.8x
Liabilities / assets 73.3% 63.1% 57.2%
Equity / assets 26.7% 36.9% 42.8%
Interest coverage 1.1x – 0.9x
Current ratio 0.9x 1.3x –
Quick ratio 0.7x 1.2x –
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.7x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBIPHOMABXHR
Dividend yield 0.0% 5.5% 2.8%
Net buyback yield – – 2.7%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 5.5% 5.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) 71.4% – -9.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) -215.5% – 0.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) 10.5% – 32.3%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 40.3% – -68.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBIPHOMABXHR
Forward P/E 25.8xFY2026 15.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.59FY2026 $6.60FY2026 $-0.02FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -34.4%FY2026 +3.3%FY2026 -103.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +88.1% +28.5% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $17.63BFY2026 $933.64MFY2026 $1.08BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -23.7%FY2026 +1.1%FY2026 -0.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -44.6% +19.6% +10.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBIPHOMABXHR
Held by institutions – 12.3% 95.2%
Institutions holding – 163 298
Change in shares held, QoQ – +5.4% -2.2%
Institutions buying – 77 161
Institutions selling – 59 90
Buyers to sellers – 1.31 1.79

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BIPHOMABXHR
BIPH 1.00 0.12 0.12
OMAB 0.12 1.00 0.29
XHR 0.12 0.29 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BIPH, OMAB and XHR?

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) $9.59B, Central North Airport (OMAB) $4.78B, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) $1.87B.

Which company is growing faster?

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) +16.4%, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) +1.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) has the highest net margin (Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) -1.5%, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) -0.7%). On return on invested capital, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) leads (Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) 6.6%, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) 2.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) returned the most: Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) -11.3%, Central North Airport (OMAB) -3.6%, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) +52.1%. Over five years, Central North Airport (OMAB) compounded fastest (Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) -9.9%/yr, Central North Airport (OMAB) +15.2%/yr, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) +2.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) has the highest dividend yield: Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) 0.18%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 0.00%, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) 0.00%. Central North Airport (OMAB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) has been the steadiest (Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) 13.9%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.2%, Xenia Hotels & Resorts (XHR) 27.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BIPH, OMAB and XHR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.