BIPH vs FIP vs OMAB Stock Comparison

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners, FTAI Infrastructure and Central North Airport Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Brookfield Infrastructure Partners 5, Central North Airport 4, FTAI Infrastructure 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBIPHFIPOMABLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.47B $332.09M $4.74B BIPH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -25.3x -0.5x 16.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 25.4x — 14.9x OMAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +16.4% +72.3% — FIP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1.5% -91.9% — BIPH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.6% -15.3% — BIPH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 6.1x -11.3x — FIP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 4.27% 5.51% OMAB
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -13.8% -48.0% -4.2% OMAB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -10.3%/yr — +15.2%/yr OMAB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 13.9% 70.3% 31.1% BIPH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 21/100 46/100 BIPH

Percentile Scorecard

BIPHFIPOMAB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBIPHFIPOMAB
Valuation 67 #46 of 136 1 #135 of 136 30 #96 of 136
Growth 87 #17 of 122 26 #90 of 122 –
Profitability 41 #69 of 116 3 #113 of 116 –
Financial Health 13 #124 of 143 1 #141 of 143 35 #94 of 143
Shareholder Returns 33 #55 of 81 74 #22 of 81 75 #21 of 81
Overall 48 21 46
  • BIPH ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • FIP ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBIPHFIPOMABSPY
1 month -1.6%-2.8%-3.6% +0.9%
3 months -6.7%-25.7%-7.6% +5.9%
6 months -8.5%-50.4%-7.4% +8.5%
Year to date -7.9%-39.0%-9.7% +13.3%
1 year -13.8%-48.0%-4.2% +12.4%
3 years +1.4%-8.5%+73.1% +88.1%
3 years, per year +0.4%-2.9%+20.1% +23.5%
5 years -42.0%—+103.0% +68.2%
5 years, per year -10.3%—+15.2% +11.0%
10 years ——+108.9% +263.4%
10 years, per year ——+7.6% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureBIPHFIPOMABSPY
Volatility, 1Y 13.9%70.3%31.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 15.7%71.6%28.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.092.071.12 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.99-0.68-0.14 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.5%-77.6%-42.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -13.8%-56.4%-27.2% -0.9%
52-week high $17.40$6.44$134.98 $779.14
52-week low $15.00$2.31$88.75 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBIPHFIPOMAB
P/E now vs peer median -25.3xmedian 16.1x -0.5xmedian 16.1x 16.0xmedian 16.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 0.9x 0.5xmedian 0.9x 5.3xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.0xmedian 8.6x -12.6xmedian 8.6x —median 8.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -12.0xmedian 11.6x -1.0xmedian 11.6x 11.7xmedian 11.6x
P/B now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 1.2x -0.6xmedian 1.2x 7.5xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.80 0.01median 0.80 —median 0.80

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBIPHFIPOMAB
Revenue $25.06B $659.21M –
Gross profit $6.65B – –
Operating income $6.20B – –
Net income $2.39B -$468.91M –
Free cash flow -$792.00M -$318.87M –
EPS (diluted) – $-5.13 –
Cash & equivalents $3.09B $32.63M $172.32M
Total debt $67.76B $2.76B $746.90M
Shares (diluted) – 118.16M –
Enterprise value -$8.51B -$19.42M $4.23B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBIPHFIPOMAB
P/E -25.3x -0.5x 16.0x
P/FCF -12.0x -1.0x 11.7x
P/Operating cash flow 1.5x -5.8x –
P/S 0.4x 0.5x 5.3x
P/B 0.3x -0.6x 7.5x
P/Tangible book 0.5x -0.6x -9.6x
EV/EBITDA 7.0x -12.6x –
EV/EBIT 11.9x -7.0x –
EV/Revenue 2.9x 4.6x –
EV/FCF -93.1x -9.6x –
EV/Operating cash flow 11.7x -53.3x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.01 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBIPHFIPOMAB
Revenue growth (1Y) 16.4% 72.3% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 16.6% 28.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 16.9% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 48.1% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 17.8% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 28.4% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 63.4% -299.3% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 15.0% -40.5% –
EPS growth (1Y) – -273.4% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -41.9% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 30.9% 32.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 26.0% -138.6% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 72.5% -10.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.5% -22.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBIPHFIPOMAB
Gross margin 26.5% – –
EBITDA margin 41.9% -36.8% –
Operating margin 24.8% – –
Pretax margin 11.8% -66.7% –
Net margin -1.5% -91.9% –
FCF margin -3.2% -48.4% –
Operating cash flow margin 25.1% -8.7% –
Return on equity 7.2% – –
Return on assets 1.9% -8.2% –
Return on invested capital 6.6% -15.3% –
Return on capital employed 5.6% -10.0% –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.1x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.6x 0.1x –
Stock comp / revenue – 3.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBIPHFIPOMAB
Debt / assets 55.6% 48.1% 43.4%
Debt / equity 2.1x -5.3x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 6.1x -11.3x –
Debt / FCF -85.6x -8.7x –
Liabilities / assets 73.3% 109.0% 63.1%
Equity / assets 26.7% -9.0% 36.9%
Interest coverage 1.1x – –
Current ratio 0.9x 0.3x 1.3x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.0x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.0x 0.7x
Altman Z-score – -0.49 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBIPHFIPOMAB
Dividend yield 0.0% 4.3% 5.5%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 4.3% 5.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) 71.4% -3.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) -215.5% -4.4% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 10.5% 2.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 40.3% 14.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBIPHFIPOMAB
Forward P/E 25.4xFY2026 – 14.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.59FY2026 $-3.58FY2026 $6.60FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -34.4%FY2026 – +3.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +88.1% – +28.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $17.63BFY2026 $701.40MFY2026 $933.64MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -23.7%FY2026 +39.6%FY2026 +1.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -44.6% +18.4% +19.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBIPHFIPOMAB
Held by institutions – 87.9% 12.3%
Institutions holding – 176 163
Change in shares held, QoQ – +4.6% +5.4%
Institutions buying – 86 77
Institutions selling – 47 59
Buyers to sellers – 1.83 1.31

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BIPHFIPOMAB
BIPH 1.00 0.09 0.12
FIP 0.09 1.00 0.21
OMAB 0.12 0.21 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BIPH, FIP and OMAB?

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) $9.47B, FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) $332.09M, Central North Airport (OMAB) $4.74B.

Which company is growing faster?

FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) +16.4%, FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) +72.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) has the highest net margin (Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) -1.5%, FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) -91.9%). On return on invested capital, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) leads (Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) 6.6%, FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) -15.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Central North Airport (OMAB) returned the most: Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) -13.8%, FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) -48.0%, Central North Airport (OMAB) -4.2%. Over five years, Central North Airport (OMAB) compounded fastest (Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) -10.3%/yr, Central North Airport (OMAB) +15.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Central North Airport (OMAB) has the highest dividend yield: Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) 0.00%, FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) 4.27%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 5.51%. Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) has been the steadiest (Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) 13.9%, FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) 70.3%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BIPH, FIP and OMAB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIPH) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.