BIOE vs KMB vs BBWI Stock Comparison

Bio Essence, Kimberly Clark and Bath & Body Works Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BIOE Bio Essence Corp
$0.42 +133.3% 1M +500.0% 1Y
Market cap
$22.60M
P/E
14.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.91M
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
3 wins
KMB Kimberly Clark Corp
$109.63 +11.4% 1M -7.8% 1Y
Market cap
$36.05B
P/E
18.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.58B
Div. yield
0.05%
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
4 wins
BBWI Bath & Body Works, Inc.
$21.38 +30.0% 1M -20.8% 1Y
Market cap
$4.72B
P/E
7.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.38B
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Kimberly Clark leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Kimberly Clark 4, Bath & Body Works 4, Bio Essence 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBIOEKMBBBWILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $22.60M $36.05B $4.72B KMB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.1x 18.4x 7.1x BBWI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 14.3x 7.6x BBWI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +416.6% +0.7% +0.1% BIOE
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 52.1% 11.8% 9.0% BIOE
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 19.4% 32.2% BBWI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.7x 2.0x KMB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.05% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +500.0% -7.8% -20.8% BIOE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -3.2%/yr -20.8%/yr KMB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 211.5% 29.4% 61.9% KMB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 63/100 54/100 65/100 BBWI

Percentile Scorecard

BIOEKMBBBWI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBIOEKMBBBWI
Valuation 53 #25 of 52 55 #24 of 52 90 #6 of 52
Growth 100 #1 of 50 43 #29 of 50 47 #27 of 50
Profitability 100 #1 of 45 82 #9 of 45 93 #4 of 45
Financial Health 53 #27 of 56 38 #35 of 56 31 #39 of 56
Shareholder Returns 10 #28 of 31 50 #16 of 31 63 #12 of 31
Overall 63 54 65
  • BIOE ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • KMB ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • BBWI ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBIOEKMBBBWISPY
1 month +133.3%+11.4%+30.0% -0.8%
3 months +55.6%-1.6%+4.3% +3.5%
6 months -6.7%+11.6%+12.6% +7.0%
Year to date +600.0%+8.7%+6.5% +12.2%
1 year +500.0%-7.8%-20.8% +13.0%
3 years —-6.2%-24.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year —-2.1%-8.9% +23.1%
5 years —-15.2%-68.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year —-3.2%-20.8% +11.0%
10 years —-3.5%-63.7% +258.0%
10 years, per year —-0.4%-9.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBIOEKMBBBWISPY
Volatility, 1Y 211.5%29.4%61.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 401.9%32.9%64.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -1.120.021.41 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.36-0.27-0.34 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -98.7%-37.3%-81.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.2%-9.1%-18.1% -1.8%
52-week high $0.52$120.66$26.09 $779.14
52-week low $0.05$93.05$14.85 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBIOEKMBBBWI
P/E now vs peer median 14.1xmedian 18.6x 18.6xmedian 18.6x 7.0xmedian 18.6x
P/S now vs peer median 7.8xmedian 1.6x 2.2xmedian 1.6x 0.6xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.8xmedian 13.0x 13.0xmedian 13.0x 5.2xmedian 13.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 21.0xmedian 18.4x 20.0xmedian 18.4x 4.7xmedian 18.4x
P/B now vs peer median 9.6xmedian 2.1x 19.5xmedian 2.1x -4.1xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.85median 0.97 2.83median 0.97 3.31median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBIOEKMBBBWI
Revenue $2.91M $16.58B $7.38B
Gross profit $2.03M $6.10B $3.23B
Operating income $1.54M $2.51B $1.13B
Net income $1.52M $1.99B $662.00M
Free cash flow $1.08M $1.82B –
EPS (diluted) $0.04 $5.87 $3.28
Cash & equivalents $675.00 $956.00M $794.00M
Total debt – $6.52B $3.61B
Shares (diluted) 38.01M 333.30M 202.00M
Enterprise value $22.53M $33.25B $2.37B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBIOEKMBBBWI
P/E 14.1x 18.6x 7.0x
P/FCF 21.0x 20.0x 4.7x
P/Operating cash flow 21.0x 10.9x –
P/S 7.8x 2.2x 0.6x
P/B 9.6x 19.5x -4.1x
P/Tangible book -21.4x 20.2x -3.5x
EV/EBITDA 13.8x 13.0x 5.2x
EV/EBIT 14.7x 16.7x 6.3x
EV/Revenue 7.8x 2.5x 1.0x
EV/FCF 21.0x 23.1x –
EV/Operating cash flow 21.0x 12.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.85 2.83 3.31

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBIOEKMBBBWI
Revenue growth (1Y) 416.6% 0.7% 0.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 66.7% -6.7% -0.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 438.0% 2.0% -1.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 75.3% -2.8% 0.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 637.2% -5.8% -10.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 114.3% 3.5% -2.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 210.5% -18.9% -9.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 55.1% 6.5% -2.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 210.5% -19.5% -5.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 16.5% 6.6% 2.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.7% 16.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 51.3% 1.5% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 14.7% -13.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 51.2% -8.7% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBIOEKMBBBWI
Gross margin 69.7% 36.8% 43.8%
EBITDA margin 56.4% 19.5% 18.7%
Operating margin 52.9% 15.2% 15.4%
Pretax margin 52.8% 13.5% 12.2%
Net margin 52.1% 11.8% 9.0%
FCF margin 36.9% 11.0% –
Operating cash flow margin 36.9% 20.1% –
Return on equity 331.7% 105.0% –
Return on assets 63.3% 11.1% 12.9%
Return on invested capital – 19.4% 32.2%
Return on capital employed 194.6% 23.1% 33.3%
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.9x 1.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 1.7x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBIOEKMBBBWI
Debt / assets – 35.1% 70.1%
Debt / equity – 3.5x -3.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.7x 2.0x
Debt / FCF – 3.6x –
Liabilities / assets 41.5% 89.9% 120.5%
Equity / assets 58.5% 10.1% -20.5%
Interest coverage 2,186x 10.7x 4.2x
Current ratio 0.4x 0.9x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.0x 0.4x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.1x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 6.69 3.35 2.32

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBIOEKMBBBWI
Dividend yield – 4.7% 3.7%
Net buyback yield -1.9% 0.0% –
Shareholder yield -1.9% 4.7% 3.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 84.4% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 92.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 2.2% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBIOEKMBBBWI
Forward P/E – 14.3xFY2026 7.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $7.64FY2026 $2.80FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +1.5%FY2026 -12.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -8.0% -5.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $16.99BFY2026 $7.36BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +3.3%FY2026 +1.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +5.2% +0.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBIOEKMBBBWI
Held by institutions – 96.8% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 1,710 463
Change in shares held, QoQ – +9.1% +1.6%
Institutions buying – 827 244
Institutions selling – 620 171
Buyers to sellers – 1.33 1.43

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BIOEKMBBBWI
BIOE 1.00 -0.01 0.13
KMB -0.01 1.00 0.16
BBWI 0.13 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BIOE, KMB and BBWI?

Kimberly Clark (KMB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bio Essence (BIOE) $22.60M, Kimberly Clark (KMB) $36.05B, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) $4.72B.

Which stock is cheaper, BIOE, KMB and BBWI?

Bath & Body Works (BBWI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bio Essence (BIOE) 14.1x, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 18.4x, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) 7.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) is cheapest (Kimberly Clark (KMB) 14.3x, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) 7.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Bio Essence (BIOE) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bio Essence (BIOE) +416.6%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) +0.7%, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) +0.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Bio Essence (BIOE) has the highest net margin (Bio Essence (BIOE) 52.1%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 11.8%, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) 9.0%). On return on invested capital, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) leads (Kimberly Clark (KMB) 19.4%, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) 32.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bio Essence (BIOE) returned the most: Bio Essence (BIOE) +500.0%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) -7.8%, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) -20.8%. Over five years, Kimberly Clark (KMB) compounded fastest (Kimberly Clark (KMB) -3.2%/yr, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) -20.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Kimberly Clark (KMB) 0.05%, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) 0.00%. Bio Essence (BIOE) and Bath & Body Works (BBWI) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kimberly Clark (KMB) has been the steadiest (Bio Essence (BIOE) 211.5%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 29.4%, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) 61.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BIOE, KMB and BBWI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kimberly Clark (KMB) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.