BILI vs TGLO vs AAQL Stock Comparison

Bilibili, Theglobe Com and Antiaging Quantum Living Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BILI Bilibili Inc.
$12.90 -14.8% 1M -59.2% 1Y
Market cap
$10.68B
P/E
48.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.49B
Div. yield
–
Social Media Technology
4 wins
TGLO Theglobe Com Inc
$0.15 -11.8% 1M -65.9% 1Y
Market cap
$66.22M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Social Media Technology
1 win

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Bilibili leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Bilibili 4, Antiaging Quantum Living 2, Theglobe Com 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBILITGLOAAQLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $10.68B $66.22M $17.48M BILI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 48.8x -280.4x -17.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.0x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.2% — +62.4% AAQL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.9% — -69.4% BILI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.9% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — -0.4x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -59.2% -65.9% -48.5% AAQL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -29.4%/yr +4.6%/yr +4.5%/yr TGLO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 46.4% 196.4% 120.5% BILI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 — 17/100 BILI

Percentile Scorecard

BILITGLOAAQL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBILITGLOAAQL
Valuation 34 #110 of 166 – 12 #146 of 166
Growth 87 #20 of 152 19 #124 of 152 36 #97 of 152
Profitability 54 #70 of 152 – 10 #137 of 152
Financial Health 45 #99 of 179 5 #171 of 179 11 #159 of 179
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 55 – 17
  • BILI ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • TGLO ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • AAQL ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBILITGLOAAQLSPY
1 month -14.8%-11.8%-12.1% +0.9%
3 months -30.4%-11.8%-16.4% +5.9%
6 months -39.9%-51.6%-17.7% +8.5%
Year to date -47.5%-51.6%-15.0% +13.3%
1 year -59.2%-65.9%-48.5% +12.4%
3 years -3.0%-44.4%-53.6% +88.1%
3 years, per year -1.0%-17.8%-22.6% +23.5%
5 years -82.4%+25.0%+24.4% +68.2%
5 years, per year -29.4%+4.6%+4.5% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureBILITGLOAAQLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 46.4%196.4%120.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 47.6%221.2%451.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.481.830.17 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.28-0.34-0.40 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -90.0%-88.5%-76.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -64.1%-74.6%-49.0% -0.9%
52-week high $35.92$0.59$1.00 $779.14
52-week low $12.90$0.11$0.51 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBILITGLOAAQL
P/E now vs peer median 49.4xmedian 16.8x -280.4xmedian 16.8x -17.1xmedian 16.8x
P/S now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 1.4x —median 1.4x 11.9xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.9x —median 13.9x -19.6xmedian 13.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 11.4x —median 11.4x -28.2xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 1.8x -36.1xmedian 1.8x -17.6xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 1.59median 0.36 30.52median 0.36 0.10median 0.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBILITGLOAAQL
Revenue $4.49B – $1.47M
Gross profit $1.66B – $780.28K
Operating income $199.33M -$139.07K -$1.02M
Net income $232.09M -$236.18K -$1.02M
Free cash flow – – -$619.31K
R&D $537.35M – –
EPS (diluted) $0.25 $0.00 $-0.03
Cash & equivalents $760.10M $15.12K $608.10K
Total debt $2.12B $4.93M $3.49M
Shares (diluted) 888.05M 441.48M 34.28M
Enterprise value $1.15B $66.15M $14.98M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBILITGLOAAQL
P/E 49.4x -280.4x -17.1x
P/FCF – – -28.2x
P/Operating cash flow – – -38.2x
P/S 2.4x – 11.9x
P/B 4.6x -36.1x -17.6x
P/Tangible book 5.6x -36.1x -17.6x
EV/EBITDA – – -19.6x
EV/EBIT 54.1x -485.5x -17.5x
EV/Revenue 2.4x – 12.1x
EV/FCF – – -28.8x
EV/Operating cash flow – – -39.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.59 30.52 0.10

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBILITGLOAAQL
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.2% – 62.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 11.9% – 391.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 13.6% – 69.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 35.6% – 297.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 341.5% -14.4% -42.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 30.1% -7.8% -182.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 733.2% -15.9% -59.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 32.0% -9.2% -182.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 239.4% -15.9% -39.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 31.1% -9.2% -170.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 47.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -107.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 30.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -129.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBILITGLOAAQL
Gross margin 37.0% – 53.0%
EBITDA margin – – -61.8%
Operating margin 4.4% – -69.3%
Pretax margin 4.9% – -68.7%
Net margin 4.9% – -69.4%
FCF margin – – -42.0%
Operating cash flow margin – – -31.1%
Return on equity 10.1% – –
Return on assets 3.8% -2,520% -41.1%
Return on invested capital 4.9% – –
Return on capital employed 6.7% – –
Asset turnover 0.7x – 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 0.4x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBILITGLOAAQL
Debt / assets 33.9% 8,627% 30.3%
Debt / equity 0.9x -0.7x -1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – -0.4x
Debt / FCF – – -1.6x
Liabilities / assets 62.5% 12,227% 130.5%
Equity / assets 37.5% -12,127% -30.5%
Interest coverage 8.8x -1.4x –
Current ratio 1.3x 0.0x 0.8x
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.0x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.7x 0.0x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – – 0.61

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBILITGLOAAQL
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBILITGLOAAQL
Forward P/E 13.0xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.99FY2026 – –
EPS growth, next FY +17.9%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +35.4% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.23BFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY +20.6%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after -0.8% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBILITGLOAAQL
Held by institutions 3.2% – –
Institutions holding 155 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.0% – –
Institutions buying 92 – –
Institutions selling 44 – –
Buyers to sellers 2.09 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BILITGLOAAQL
BILI 1.00 0.09 0.00
TGLO 0.09 1.00 0.00
AAQL 0.00 0.00 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BILI, TGLO and AAQL?

Bilibili (BILI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bilibili (BILI) $10.68B, Theglobe Com (TGLO) $66.22M, Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) $17.48M.

Which company is growing faster?

Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bilibili (BILI) +10.2%, Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) +62.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Bilibili (BILI) has the highest net margin (Bilibili (BILI) 4.9%, Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) -69.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) returned the most: Bilibili (BILI) -59.2%, Theglobe Com (TGLO) -65.9%, Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) -48.5%. Over five years, Theglobe Com (TGLO) compounded fastest (Bilibili (BILI) -29.4%/yr, Theglobe Com (TGLO) +4.6%/yr, Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) +4.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Bilibili (BILI) has been the steadiest (Bilibili (BILI) 46.4%, Theglobe Com (TGLO) 196.4%, Antiaging Quantum Living (AAQL) 120.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BILI, TGLO and AAQL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bilibili (BILI) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.