BHC vs GRML vs TEVA Stock Comparison

Bausch Health Companies, Greenland Mines and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GRML Greenland Mines Ltd
$5.79 -60.5% 1M +929.2% 1Y
Market cap
$14.52M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Teva Pharmaceutical Industries 7, Bausch Health Companies 2, Greenland Mines 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBHCGRMLTEVALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.37B $14.52M $47.06B TEVA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -2.2x -0.7x 66.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 1.3x — 20.8x BHC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.1% — +4.1% BHC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -10.1% — 4.1% TEVA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.6% — 6.4% TEVA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 8.9x — 5.0x TEVA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +2.6% +929.2% +110.9% GRML
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -25.5%/yr — +35.0%/yr TEVA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 54.8% 445.7% 38.0% TEVA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 34/100 66/100 TEVA

Percentile Scorecard

BHCGRMLTEVA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBHCGRMLTEVA
Valuation 99 #9 of 626 13 #542 of 626 84 #103 of 626
Growth 44 #341 of 604 2 #590 of 604 83 #102 of 604
Profitability 84 #90 of 555 68 #179 of 555 86 #81 of 555
Financial Health 15 #561 of 658 78 #147 of 658 11 #586 of 658
Shareholder Returns – 7 #342 of 368 –
Overall 60 34 66
  • BHC ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • GRML ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • TEVA ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBHCGRMLTEVASPY
1 month +11.8%-60.5%+2.0% -0.8%
3 months +41.6%+2,947.4%+28.6% +3.5%
6 months +14.0%+1,129.8%+27.8% +7.0%
Year to date -8.5%+1,903.5%+28.0% +12.2%
1 year +2.6%+929.2%+110.9% +13.0%
3 years -3.2%-45.8%+392.1% +86.3%
3 years, per year -1.1%-18.5%+70.2% +23.1%
5 years -77.1%—+347.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year -25.5%—+35.0% +11.0%
10 years -70.9%—-7.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year -11.6%—-0.8% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBHCGRMLTEVASPY
Volatility, 1Y 54.8%445.7%38.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 48.0%158.9%27.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.882.770.74 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.052.082.92 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -84.9%-99.0%-43.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.5%-61.1%-3.7% -1.8%
52-week high $7.90$14.89$41.49 $779.14
52-week low $4.43$0.17$19.61 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBHCGRMLTEVA
P/E now vs peer median -2.2xmedian 17.1x -0.7xmedian 17.1x 65.9xmedian 17.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 8.8x —median 8.8x 2.7xmedian 8.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.0xmedian 17.1x —median 17.1x 23.0xmedian 17.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 18.0x -1.0xmedian 18.0x 34.5xmedian 18.0x
P/B now vs peer median -1.3xmedian 2.1x 0.3xmedian 2.1x 6.0xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.03median 0.31 0.01median 0.31 2.07median 0.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBHCGRMLTEVA
Revenue $10.85B – $17.32B
Gross profit $7.80B – $9.09B
Operating income $883.00M -$18.67M $1.60B
Net income -$1.10B -$21.77M $708.00M
Free cash flow $1.43B -$14.22M $1.35B
R&D $663.00M $1.28M $1.72B
EPS (diluted) $-2.90 $-8.60 $0.61
Cash & equivalents $1.83B $9.34M $3.66B
Total debt $20.74B $2.07M $16.59B
Shares (diluted) 378.10M 2.53M 1.17B
Enterprise value -$3.37B -$19.35M $33.91B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBHCGRMLTEVA
P/E -2.2x -0.7x 65.9x
P/FCF 1.7x -1.0x 34.5x
P/Operating cash flow 1.3x -1.0x 24.5x
P/S 0.2x – 2.7x
P/B -1.3x 0.3x 6.0x
P/Tangible book -0.4x 1.6x 10.8x
EV/EBITDA 10.0x – 23.0x
EV/EBIT 24.1x -0.3x 37.1x
EV/Revenue 2.0x – 3.4x
EV/FCF 14.9x -0.4x 44.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.8x -0.4x 31.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.03 0.01 2.07

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBHCGRMLTEVA
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.1% – 4.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.1% – 4.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.8% – 10.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.8% – 10.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -44.7% -127.6% 79.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 14.1% -166.2% 49.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -1,721% -91.7% 438.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -76.0% -125.4% 31.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -1,206% 48.6% 545.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -79.0% -48.2% 31.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 19.5% -158.2% 36.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 83.8% -236.9% 3.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 28.3% -158.2% 51.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 62.6% -236.9% 4.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBHCGRMLTEVA
Gross margin 71.8% – 52.5%
EBITDA margin 19.6% – 15.0%
Operating margin 8.1% – 9.3%
Pretax margin -6.7% – 4.1%
Net margin -10.1% – 4.1%
FCF margin 13.2% – 7.8%
Operating cash flow margin 16.6% – 11.0%
Return on equity – -39.8% 8.9%
Return on assets -4.4% -34.9% 1.8%
Return on invested capital 4.6% – 6.4%
Return on capital employed 4.4% -30.5% 6.6%
Asset turnover 0.4x – 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.6x 0.7x 2.7x
Stock comp / revenue 2.1% – 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBHCGRMLTEVA
Debt / assets 83.7% 0.5% 41.6%
Debt / equity -11.7x 0.0x 2.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 8.9x – 5.0x
Debt / FCF 14.5x 0.0x 12.3x
Liabilities / assets 107.1% 10.9% 80.5%
Equity / assets -7.1% 89.1% 19.5%
Interest coverage 0.5x -2,872x –
Current ratio 1.4x 10.1x 0.9x
Quick ratio 0.9x 7.7x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.4x 7.7x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 0.09 – 0.89

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBHCGRMLTEVA
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -49.5% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% -49.5% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBHCGRMLTEVA
Forward P/E 1.3xFY2026 – 20.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.86FY2026 – $1.92FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +26.9%FY2026 – -32.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -13.4% – +66.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $11.45BFY2026 – $15.65BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +11.9%FY2026 – -6.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -0.5% – +17.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBHCGRMLTEVA
Held by institutions 63.3% 12.0% 62.7%
Institutions holding 221 47 670
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.9% +96.3% +8.6%
Institutions buying 99 34 359
Institutions selling 63 2 190
Buyers to sellers 1.57 17.00 1.89

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BHCGRMLTEVA
BHC 1.00 0.09 0.19
GRML 0.09 1.00 0.01
TEVA 0.19 0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BHC, GRML and TEVA?

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bausch Health Companies (BHC) $2.37B, Greenland Mines (GRML) $14.52M, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) $47.06B.

Which company is growing faster?

Bausch Health Companies (BHC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bausch Health Companies (BHC) +10.1%, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) +4.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) has the highest net margin (Bausch Health Companies (BHC) -10.1%, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) 4.1%). On return on invested capital, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) leads (Bausch Health Companies (BHC) 4.6%, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) 6.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Greenland Mines (GRML) returned the most: Bausch Health Companies (BHC) +2.6%, Greenland Mines (GRML) +929.2%, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) +110.9%. Over five years, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) compounded fastest (Bausch Health Companies (BHC) -25.5%/yr, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) +35.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) has been the steadiest (Bausch Health Companies (BHC) 54.8%, Greenland Mines (GRML) 445.7%, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) 38.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BHC, GRML and TEVA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.