BHC vs GRML vs ANIP Stock Comparison

Bausch Health Companies, Greenland Mines and Ani Pharmaceuticals Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GRML Greenland Mines Ltd
$5.79 -60.5% 1M +929.2% 1Y
Market cap
$14.52M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
1 win
ANIP Ani Pharmaceuticals Inc
$72.60 -1.9% 1M -23.0% 1Y
Market cap
$1.50B
P/E
13.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$978.38M
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
7 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Ani Pharmaceuticals leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Ani Pharmaceuticals 7, Bausch Health Companies 2, Greenland Mines 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBHCGRMLANIPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.37B $14.52M $1.50B BHC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -2.2x -0.7x 13.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 1.3x — 7.4x BHC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.1% — +30.9% ANIP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -10.1% — 11.0% ANIP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.6% — 12.9% ANIP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 8.9x — -0.2x ANIP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +2.6% +929.2% -23.0% GRML
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -25.5%/yr — +14.4%/yr ANIP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 54.8% 445.7% 32.0% ANIP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 34/100 84/100 ANIP

Percentile Scorecard

BHCGRMLANIP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBHCGRMLANIP
Valuation 99 #9 of 626 13 #542 of 626 96 #24 of 626
Growth 44 #341 of 604 2 #590 of 604 97 #18 of 604
Profitability 84 #90 of 555 68 #179 of 555 90 #56 of 555
Financial Health 15 #561 of 658 78 #147 of 658 46 #359 of 658
Shareholder Returns – 7 #342 of 368 92 #31 of 368
Overall 60 34 84
  • BHC ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • GRML ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • ANIP ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBHCGRMLANIPSPY
1 month +11.8%-60.5%-1.9% -0.8%
3 months +41.6%+2,947.4%-7.4% +3.5%
6 months +14.0%+1,129.8%-8.8% +7.0%
Year to date -8.5%+1,903.5%-8.0% +12.2%
1 year +2.6%+929.2%-23.0% +13.0%
3 years -3.2%-45.8%+23.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year -1.1%-18.5%+7.2% +23.1%
5 years -77.1%—+95.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year -25.5%—+14.4% +11.0%
10 years -70.9%—+9.3% +258.0%
10 years, per year -11.6%—+0.9% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBHCGRMLANIPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 54.8%445.7%32.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 48.0%158.9%31.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.882.770.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.052.08-0.72 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -84.9%-99.0%-59.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.5%-61.1%-23.2% -1.8%
52-week high $7.90$14.89$94.48 $779.14
52-week low $4.43$0.17$70.16 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBHCGRMLANIP
P/E now vs peer median -2.2xmedian 17.1x -0.7xmedian 17.1x 14.2xmedian 17.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 8.8x —median 8.8x 1.8xmedian 8.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.0xmedian 17.1x —median 17.1x 7.0xmedian 17.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 18.0x -1.0xmedian 18.0x 10.0xmedian 18.0x
P/B now vs peer median -1.3xmedian 2.1x 0.3xmedian 2.1x 2.9xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.03median 0.31 0.01median 0.31 0.10median 0.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBHCGRMLANIP
Revenue $10.85B – $978.38M
Gross profit $7.80B – $590.98M
Operating income $883.00M -$18.67M $150.36M
Net income -$1.10B -$21.77M $108.31M
Free cash flow $1.43B -$14.22M $172.99M
R&D $663.00M $1.28M $49.91M
EPS (diluted) $-2.90 $-8.60 $4.93
Cash & equivalents $1.83B $9.34M $360.21M
Total debt $20.74B $2.07M $301.48M
Shares (diluted) 378.10M 2.53M 21.92M
Enterprise value -$3.37B -$19.35M $285.39M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBHCGRMLANIP
P/E -2.2x -0.7x 14.2x
P/FCF 1.7x -1.0x 10.0x
P/Operating cash flow 1.3x -1.0x 9.1x
P/S 0.2x – 1.8x
P/B -1.3x 0.3x 2.9x
P/Tangible book -0.4x 1.6x 11.8x
EV/EBITDA 10.0x – 7.0x
EV/EBIT 24.1x -0.3x 11.1x
EV/Revenue 2.0x – 1.7x
EV/FCF 14.9x -0.4x 9.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 11.8x -0.4x 8.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.03 0.01 0.10

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBHCGRMLANIP
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.1% – 30.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.1% – 34.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.8% – 29.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.8% – 32.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -44.7% -127.6% 889.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 14.1% -166.2% 98.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -1,721% -91.7% 1,161%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -76.0% -125.4% 184.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -1,206% 48.6% 945.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -79.0% -48.2% 146.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 19.5% -158.2% 36.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 83.8% -236.9% 66.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 28.3% -158.2% 37.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 62.6% -236.9% 77.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBHCGRMLANIP
Gross margin 71.8% – 60.4%
EBITDA margin 19.6% – 24.3%
Operating margin 8.1% – 15.4%
Pretax margin -6.7% – 14.6%
Net margin -10.1% – 11.0%
FCF margin 13.2% – 17.7%
Operating cash flow margin 16.6% – 19.4%
Return on equity – -39.8% 18.7%
Return on assets -4.4% -34.9% 7.4%
Return on invested capital 4.6% – 12.9%
Return on capital employed 4.4% -30.5% 12.8%
Asset turnover 0.4x – 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.6x 0.7x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 2.1% – 4.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBHCGRMLANIP
Debt / assets 83.7% 0.5% 20.2%
Debt / equity -11.7x 0.0x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 8.9x – -0.2x
Debt / FCF 14.5x 0.0x 1.7x
Liabilities / assets 107.1% 10.9% 60.0%
Equity / assets -7.1% 89.1% 40.0%
Interest coverage 0.5x -2,872x –
Current ratio 1.4x 10.1x 2.9x
Quick ratio 0.9x 7.7x 2.2x
Cash ratio 0.4x 7.7x 1.3x
Altman Z-score 0.09 – 2.61

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBHCGRMLANIP
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -49.5% 0.6%
Shareholder yield 0.0% -49.5% 0.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBHCGRMLANIP
Forward P/E 1.3xFY2026 – 7.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.86FY2026 – $9.81FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +26.9%FY2026 – +24.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -13.4% – -2.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $11.45BFY2026 – $1.15BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +11.9%FY2026 – +29.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -0.5% – +9.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBHCGRMLANIP
Held by institutions 63.3% 12.0% 96.0%
Institutions holding 221 47 306
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.9% +96.3% -1.8%
Institutions buying 99 34 172
Institutions selling 63 2 88
Buyers to sellers 1.57 17.00 1.95

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BHCGRMLANIP
BHC 1.00 0.09 0.16
GRML 0.09 1.00 0.00
ANIP 0.16 0.00 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BHC, GRML and ANIP?

Bausch Health Companies (BHC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bausch Health Companies (BHC) $2.37B, Greenland Mines (GRML) $14.52M, Ani Pharmaceuticals (ANIP) $1.50B.

Which company is growing faster?

Ani Pharmaceuticals (ANIP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bausch Health Companies (BHC) +10.1%, Ani Pharmaceuticals (ANIP) +30.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ani Pharmaceuticals (ANIP) has the highest net margin (Bausch Health Companies (BHC) -10.1%, Ani Pharmaceuticals (ANIP) 11.0%). On return on invested capital, Ani Pharmaceuticals (ANIP) leads (Bausch Health Companies (BHC) 4.6%, Ani Pharmaceuticals (ANIP) 12.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Greenland Mines (GRML) returned the most: Bausch Health Companies (BHC) +2.6%, Greenland Mines (GRML) +929.2%, Ani Pharmaceuticals (ANIP) -23.0%. Over five years, Ani Pharmaceuticals (ANIP) compounded fastest (Bausch Health Companies (BHC) -25.5%/yr, Ani Pharmaceuticals (ANIP) +14.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ani Pharmaceuticals (ANIP) has been the steadiest (Bausch Health Companies (BHC) 54.8%, Greenland Mines (GRML) 445.7%, Ani Pharmaceuticals (ANIP) 32.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BHC, GRML and ANIP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ani Pharmaceuticals (ANIP) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.