BGM vs NTR vs BHC Stock Comparison

Bgm, Nutrien and Bausch Health Companies Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BGM BGM Group Ltd.
$8.93 +3,472.0% 1M -3.7% 1Y
Market cap
$33.71M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
NTR Nutrien Ltd.
$68.47 -3.8% 1M +21.3% 1Y
Market cap
$33.61B
P/E
15.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$28.21B
Div. yield
–
Fertilizers Basic Materials
3 wins

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

Nutrien leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Nutrien 3, Bausch Health Companies 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBGMNTRBHCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $33.71M $33.61B $3.29B NTR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 15.1x -3.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 13.5x 1.8x BHC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +8.6% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 7.9% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 11.8% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.3x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -3.7% +21.3% +50.7% BHC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -0.4%/yr -20.6%/yr NTR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 379.7% 33.1% 60.6% NTR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 68/100 — –

Percentile Scorecard

BGMNTRBHC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBGMNTRBHC
Valuation – 89 #11 of 94 97 #19 of 624
Growth – 60 #37 of 92 34 #399 of 601
Profitability – 77 #21 of 86 –
Financial Health 60 #258 of 647 74 #25 of 93 –
Shareholder Returns – 39 #44 of 71 –
Overall – 68 –
  • BGM ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • NTR ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • BHC ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBGMNTRBHCSPY
1 month +3,472.0%-3.8%+53.3% +0.7%
3 months +3,207.4%-3.2%+47.4% +3.7%
6 months +2,947.8%-9.9%+55.4% +7.1%
Year to date +142.0%+10.9%+27.9% +12.8%
1 year -3.7%+21.3%+50.7% +11.9%
3 years —+22.2%+32.9% +85.2%
3 years, per year —+6.9%+9.9% +22.8%
5 years —-2.1%-68.3% +67.6%
5 years, per year —-0.4%-20.6% +10.9%
10 years ——-56.3% +262.0%
10 years, per year ——-7.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBGMNTRBHCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 379.7%33.1%60.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 158.2%34.6%47.7% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.77-0.230.83 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.010.640.84 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -98.5%-61.5%-84.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -16.9%-18.4%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $10.75$83.94$8.89 $779.14
52-week low $0.24$53.64$4.43 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBGMNTRBHC
P/E now vs peer median —median 17.8x 14.9xmedian 21.0x -4.0xmedian 17.8x
P/S now vs peer median —median 9.1x 1.2xmedian 1.4x 0.2xmedian 9.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 15.0x 5.5xmedian 12.9x —median 15.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 21.7x 5.3xmedian 15.5x 1.5xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 2.2x 1.3xmedian 1.7x —median 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.35 -1.15median 1.68 -0.72median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBGMNTRBHC
Revenue – $28.21B –
Gross profit – $8.75B –
Operating income – $5.49B $1.25B
Net income – $5.57B –
Free cash flow – $6.28B –
R&D – – $638.00M
EPS (diluted) – $4.59 $-2.22
Cash & equivalents $11.52M $921.00M –
Total debt $8.25M $11.39B –
Shares (diluted) 3.78M 486.52M 378.10M
Enterprise value -$19.80M $30.44B $3.29B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBGMNTRBHC
P/E – 14.9x -4.0x
P/FCF – 5.3x 1.5x
P/Operating cash flow – 7.9x –
P/S – 1.2x 0.2x
P/B 0.1x 1.3x –
P/Tangible book 0.1x 1.4x –
EV/EBITDA – 5.5x –
EV/EBIT – 7.9x –
EV/Revenue – 1.5x –
EV/FCF – 6.9x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 10.4x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -1.15 -0.72

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBGMNTRBHC
Revenue growth (1Y) – 8.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -5.6% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 15.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -8.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 140.9% -34.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -20.1% 50.6%
Net income growth (1Y) – 77.9% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 14.3% –
EPS growth (1Y) – 86.8% -330.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -13.0% 5.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 14.0% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -15.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 10.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -13.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBGMNTRBHC
Gross margin – 31.0% –
EBITDA margin – 28.0% –
Operating margin – 19.5% –
Pretax margin – 13.7% –
Net margin – 7.9% –
FCF margin – 22.3% –
Operating cash flow margin – 14.8% –
Return on equity – 9.4% –
Return on assets – 4.5% –
Return on invested capital – 11.8% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.5x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.8x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBGMNTRBHC
Debt / assets 0.2% 21.3% –
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.3x –
Debt / FCF – 1.8x –
Liabilities / assets 8.4% 51.6% –
Equity / assets 91.6% 48.4% –
Interest coverage – 7.8x –
Current ratio 1.3x – –
Quick ratio 0.4x – –
Cash ratio 0.3x – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBGMNTRBHC
Dividend yield – 3.2% –
Net buyback yield – -1.6% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 1.6% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBGMNTRBHC
Forward P/E – 13.5xFY2026 1.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $5.06FY2026 $4.86FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +11.5%FY2026 +26.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +4.5% -13.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $29.29BFY2026 $11.45BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +13.3%FY2026 +11.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -11.2% -0.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBGMNTRBHC
Held by institutions – 63.7% 63.3%
Institutions holding – 728 221
Change in shares held, QoQ – -0.5% +1.9%
Institutions buying – 367 99
Institutions selling – 237 63
Buyers to sellers – 1.55 1.57

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BGMNTRBHC
BGM 1.00 -0.05 -0.03
NTR -0.05 1.00 -0.11
BHC -0.03 -0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BGM, NTR and BHC?

Nutrien (NTR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bgm (BGM) $33.71M, Nutrien (NTR) $33.61B, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) $3.29B.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bausch Health Companies (BHC) returned the most: Bgm (BGM) -3.7%, Nutrien (NTR) +21.3%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) +50.7%. Over five years, Nutrien (NTR) compounded fastest (Nutrien (NTR) -0.4%/yr, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) -20.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Nutrien (NTR) has been the steadiest (Bgm (BGM) 379.7%, Nutrien (NTR) 33.1%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) 60.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BGM, NTR and BHC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Nutrien (NTR) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.