BGM vs ICL vs AMPH Stock Comparison

Bgm, Icl and Amphastar Pharmaceuticals Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BGM BGM Group Ltd.
$9.15 +3,712.5% 1M -2.1% 1Y
Market cap
$33.98M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
ICL ICL Group Ltd.
$4.91 -4.5% 1M -26.1% 1Y
Market cap
$6.02B
P/E
8.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.71B
Div. yield
–
Fertilizers Basic Materials
5 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Icl leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Icl 5, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBGMICLAMPHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $33.98M $6.02B $1.14B ICL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 8.7x 14.6x ICL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 12.3x 8.3x AMPH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +10.9% +1.0% ICL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 9.0% 10.8% AMPH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 6.4% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 1.8x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -2.1% -26.1% +6.4% AMPH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -10.7%/yr +7.1%/yr AMPH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 379.7% 39.0% 54.2% ICL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 83/100 73/100 ICL

Percentile Scorecard

BGMICLAMPH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBGMICLAMPH
Valuation – 98 #3 of 94 99 #8 of 625
Growth – 49 #47 of 91 43 #342 of 602
Profitability – 84 #15 of 86 88 #69 of 551
Financial Health 60 #266 of 656 – 38 #409 of 656
Shareholder Returns – 100 #1 of 70 99 #5 of 365
Overall – 83 73
  • BGM ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • ICL ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • AMPH ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBGMICLAMPHSPY
1 month +3,712.5%-4.5%-2.1% -0.2%
3 months +3,167.9%-6.3%+26.9% +3.9%
6 months +2,672.7%-9.6%+17.2% +8.2%
Year to date +148.0%-14.0%-4.5% +12.9%
1 year -2.1%-26.1%+6.4% +12.3%
3 years —+2.1%-42.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year —+0.7%-17.0% +23.3%
5 years —-43.0%+41.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year —-10.7%+7.1% +10.9%
10 years —+35.3%+39.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+3.1%+3.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBGMICLAMPHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 379.7%39.0%54.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 158.2%44.8%66.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.760.770.58 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.01-0.670.12 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -98.5%-70.0%-74.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.9%-28.0%-13.0% -1.2%
52-week high $10.75$6.82$29.40 $779.14
52-week low $0.24$4.70$16.87 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBGMICLAMPH
P/E now vs peer median —median 17.2x 9.2xmedian 22.0x 14.2xmedian 17.2x
P/S now vs peer median —median 9.0x 0.8xmedian 1.4x 1.5xmedian 9.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 16.3x —median 12.4x 8.1xmedian 16.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 18.7x 5.3xmedian 15.1x 7.1xmedian 18.7x
P/B now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 2.2x —median 1.6x 1.4xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.33 -0.56median 1.66 -5.55median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBGMICLAMPH
Revenue – $7.71B $730.02M
Gross profit – $2.36B $348.11M
Operating income – $715.00M $114.29M
Net income – $654.00M $78.55M
Free cash flow – $1.19B $152.89M
R&D – – $94.57M
EPS (diluted) – $0.54 $1.78
Cash & equivalents $11.52M $496.00M $223.61M
Total debt $8.25M – $612.05M
Shares (diluted) 3.78M 1.29B 44.23M
Enterprise value -$21.06M $2.72B $2.81M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBGMICLAMPH
P/E – 9.2x 14.2x
P/FCF – 5.3x 7.1x
P/Operating cash flow – – 5.9x
P/S – 0.8x 1.5x
P/B 0.1x – 1.4x
P/Tangible book 0.1x – 1.5x
EV/EBITDA – – 8.1x
EV/EBIT – 8.2x 12.3x
EV/Revenue – 0.8x 1.9x
EV/FCF – 4.9x 9.2x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 7.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -0.56 -5.55

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBGMICLAMPH
Revenue growth (1Y) – 10.9% 1.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 1.8% 10.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 5.2% -3.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 5.2% 8.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -1.7% -37.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -20.8% -4.5%
Net income growth (1Y) – -1.7% -41.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -18.0% -8.3%
EPS growth (1Y) – 88.4% -36.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -16.4% -2.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 15.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 12.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -17.5% 36.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -8.0% 15.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBGMICLAMPH
Gross margin – 30.6% 47.7%
EBITDA margin – – 23.9%
Operating margin – 9.3% 15.7%
Pretax margin – 9.9% 14.0%
Net margin – 9.0% 10.8%
FCF margin – 15.4% 20.9%
Operating cash flow margin – – 25.3%
Return on equity – – 10.2%
Return on assets – – 4.6%
Return on invested capital – – 6.4%
Return on capital employed – – 8.0%
Asset turnover – – 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 2.4x
Stock comp / revenue – – 4.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBGMICLAMPH
Debt / assets 0.2% – 35.1%
Debt / equity 0.0x – 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 1.8x
Debt / FCF – – 4.0x
Liabilities / assets 8.4% – 55.9%
Equity / assets 91.6% – 44.1%
Interest coverage – – 4.4x
Current ratio 1.3x – 2.4x
Quick ratio 0.4x – 1.7x
Cash ratio 0.3x – 1.1x
Altman Z-score – – 2.12

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBGMICLAMPH
Dividend yield – 12.8% –
Net buyback yield – – 9.0%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 12.8% 9.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBGMICLAMPH
Forward P/E – 12.3xFY2026 8.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.40FY2026 $3.09FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +11.1%FY2026 -4.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +12.5% +9.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $7.47BFY2026 $790.23MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +4.5%FY2026 +9.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +13.0% -5.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBGMICLAMPH
Held by institutions – 13.7% 64.8%
Institutions holding – 221 209
Change in shares held, QoQ – -13.5% -11.7%
Institutions buying – 140 96
Institutions selling – 56 74
Buyers to sellers – 2.50 1.30

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BGMICLAMPH
BGM 1.00 -0.01 -0.05
ICL -0.01 1.00 0.02
AMPH -0.05 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BGM, ICL and AMPH?

Icl (ICL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bgm (BGM) $33.98M, Icl (ICL) $6.02B, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) $1.14B.

Which stock is cheaper, BGM, ICL and AMPH?

Icl (ICL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Icl (ICL) 8.7x, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) 14.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) is cheapest (Icl (ICL) 12.3x, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) 8.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Icl (ICL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Icl (ICL) +10.9%, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) +1.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) has the highest net margin (Icl (ICL) 9.0%, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) 10.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) returned the most: Bgm (BGM) -2.1%, Icl (ICL) -26.1%, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) +6.4%. Over five years, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) compounded fastest (Icl (ICL) -10.7%/yr, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) +7.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Icl (ICL) has been the steadiest (Bgm (BGM) 379.7%, Icl (ICL) 39.0%, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals (AMPH) 54.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BGM, ICL and AMPH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Icl (ICL) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.