BGM vs BHC vs ELTP Stock Comparison

Bgm, Bausch Health Companies and Elite Pharmaceuticals Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BGM BGM Group Ltd.
$9.26 +3,758.3% 1M -1.3% 1Y
Market cap
$36.02M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Bausch Health Companies leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Bausch Health Companies 3, Elite Pharmaceuticals 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBGMBHCELTPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $36.02M $3.33B $247.76M BHC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — -4.0x 4.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 1.4x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — +33.7% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — 40.2% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 29.2% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — -1.0x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -1.3% +12.3% -60.7% BHC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -24.4%/yr +43.1%/yr ELTP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 379.7% 55.5% 57.4% BHC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — — 88/100 –

Percentile Scorecard

BGMBHCELTP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBGMBHCELTP
Valuation – 96 #26 of 625 98 #12 of 625
Growth – 34 #400 of 602 91 #54 of 602
Profitability – – 91 #50 of 549
Financial Health 60 #263 of 654 – 76 #156 of 654
Shareholder Returns – – 85 #55 of 367
Overall – – 88
  • BGM ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • BHC ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • ELTP ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBGMBHCELTPSPY
1 month +3,758.3%+20.2%-4.0% +0.9%
3 months +3,093.1%+48.5%-35.1% +5.9%
6 months +2,986.7%+24.3%-31.4% +8.5%
Year to date +150.9%0.0%-51.0% +13.3%
1 year -1.3%+12.3%-60.7% +12.4%
3 years —+5.8%+100.0% +88.1%
3 years, per year —+1.9%+26.0% +23.5%
5 years —-75.2%+500.0% +68.2%
5 years, per year —-24.4%+43.1% +11.0%
10 years —-65.8%+41.2% +263.4%
10 years, per year —-10.2%+3.5% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureBGMBHCELTPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 379.7%55.5%57.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 158.2%48.0%72.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.760.900.70 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.000.22-1.06 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -98.5%-84.9%-71.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -13.9%-12.0%-64.7% -0.9%
52-week high $10.75$7.90$0.68 $779.14
52-week low $0.24$4.43$0.22 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBGMBHCELTP
P/E now vs peer median —median 17.4x -3.1xmedian 17.4x 4.6xmedian 17.4x
P/S now vs peer median —median 9.1x 0.2xmedian 9.1x 1.8xmedian 9.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.1x —median 17.1x 6.1xmedian 17.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 19.0x 1.5xmedian 19.0x 14.8xmedian 19.0x
P/B now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 2.2x —median 2.2x 2.5xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.34 -0.56median 0.34 0.04median 0.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBGMBHCELTP
Revenue – – $141.01M
Gross profit – – $61.31M
Operating income – $1.25B $34.94M
Net income – – $56.67M
Free cash flow – – $17.53M
R&D – $638.00M $6.10M
EPS (diluted) – $-2.22 $0.05
Cash & equivalents $11.52M – $39.42M
Total debt $8.25M – $9.58M
Shares (diluted) 3.78M 378.10M 1.13B
Enterprise value -$19.03M $3.33B $129.44M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBGMBHCELTP
P/E – -3.1x 4.6x
P/FCF – 1.5x 14.8x
P/Operating cash flow – – 13.6x
P/S – 0.2x 1.8x
P/B 0.1x – 2.5x
P/Tangible book 0.1x – 2.6x
EV/EBITDA – – 6.1x
EV/EBIT – – 6.3x
EV/Revenue – – 1.6x
EV/FCF – – 12.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 11.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -0.56 0.04

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBGMBHCELTP
Revenue growth (1Y) – – 33.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 58.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 4.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 53.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -34.3% -6.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 50.6% 101.7%
Net income growth (1Y) – – 624.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 134.4%
EPS growth (1Y) – -330.7% 596.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 5.5% 118.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – -0.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 152.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – -2.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 81.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBGMBHCELTP
Gross margin – – 43.5%
EBITDA margin – – 25.9%
Operating margin – – 24.8%
Pretax margin – – 46.2%
Net margin – – 40.2%
FCF margin – – 12.4%
Operating cash flow margin – – 13.5%
Return on equity – – 55.6%
Return on assets – – 40.8%
Return on invested capital – – 29.2%
Return on capital employed – – 32.2%
Asset turnover – – 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 0.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBGMBHCELTP
Debt / assets 0.2% – 1.7%
Debt / equity 0.0x – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – -1.0x
Debt / FCF – – 0.1x
Liabilities / assets 8.4% – 24.9%
Equity / assets 91.6% – 75.1%
Interest coverage – – 69.4x
Current ratio 1.3x – 3.8x
Quick ratio 0.4x – 3.0x
Cash ratio 0.3x – 1.3x
Altman Z-score – – 6.31

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBGMBHCELTP
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – -0.1%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 0.0% -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBGMBHCELTP
Forward P/E – 1.4xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $4.86FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – +26.9%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – -13.4% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $11.45BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +11.9%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – -0.5% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBGMBHCELTP
Held by institutions – 63.3% 0.0%
Institutions holding – 221 1
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.9% –
Institutions buying – 99 1
Institutions selling – 63 0
Buyers to sellers – 1.57 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BGMBHCELTP
BGM 1.00 -0.03 -0.03
BHC -0.03 1.00 0.01
ELTP -0.03 0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BGM, BHC and ELTP?

Bausch Health Companies (BHC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bgm (BGM) $36.02M, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) $3.33B, Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) $247.76M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bausch Health Companies (BHC) returned the most: Bgm (BGM) -1.3%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) +12.3%, Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) -60.7%. Over five years, Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) compounded fastest (Bausch Health Companies (BHC) -24.4%/yr, Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) +43.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) has been the steadiest (Bgm (BGM) 379.7%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) 55.5%, Elite Pharmaceuticals (ELTP) 57.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BGM, BHC and ELTP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.