BGM vs AMRX vs BHC Stock Comparison

Bgm, Amneal Pharmaceuticals and Bausch Health Companies Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BGM BGM Group Ltd.
$8.40 +3,400.0% 1M -10.1% 1Y
Market cap
$32.85M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Amneal Pharmaceuticals leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Amneal Pharmaceuticals 8, Bausch Health Companies 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBGMAMRXBHCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $32.85M $6.78B $2.35B AMRX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 43.1x -2.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 21.7x 1.3x BHC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +9.3% +10.1% BHC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 5.0% -10.1% AMRX
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 17.4% 4.6% AMRX
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.8x 8.9x AMRX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -10.1% +99.2% +2.6% AMRX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +31.6%/yr -25.5%/yr AMRX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 380.3% 35.1% 54.8% AMRX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 70/100 60/100 AMRX

Percentile Scorecard

BGMAMRXBHC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBGMAMRXBHC
Valuation – 92 #54 of 626 99 #9 of 626
Growth – 74 #158 of 604 44 #341 of 604
Profitability – 84 #91 of 555 84 #90 of 555
Financial Health 60 #264 of 658 12 #582 of 658 15 #561 of 658
Shareholder Returns – 88 #44 of 368 –
Overall – 70 60
  • BGM ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • AMRX ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • BHC ranked among 673 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBGMAMRXBHCSPY
1 month +3,400.0%+6.3%+11.8% -0.8%
3 months +2,700.0%+16.2%+41.6% +3.5%
6 months +2,413.5%+67.2%+14.0% +7.0%
Year to date +127.6%+66.8%-8.5% +12.2%
1 year -10.1%+99.2%+2.6% +13.0%
3 years —+457.6%-3.2% +86.3%
3 years, per year —+77.4%-1.1% +23.1%
5 years —+293.6%-77.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year —+31.6%-25.5% +11.0%
10 years ——-70.9% +258.0%
10 years, per year ——-11.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBGMAMRXBHCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 380.3%35.1%54.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 158.2%31.0%48.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.730.700.88 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.032.830.05 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -98.5%-78.2%-84.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -21.9%0.0%-19.5% -1.8%
52-week high $10.75$21.02$7.90 $779.14
52-week low $0.24$10.00$4.43 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBGMAMRXBHC
P/E now vs peer median —median 17.1x 42.6xmedian 17.1x -2.2xmedian 17.1x
P/S now vs peer median —median 8.8x 2.2xmedian 8.8x 0.2xmedian 8.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.1x 13.9xmedian 17.1x 10.0xmedian 17.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 18.0x 80.8xmedian 18.0x 1.7xmedian 18.0x
P/B now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 2.1x 203.3xmedian 2.1x -1.3xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.31 0.18median 0.31 0.03median 0.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBGMAMRXBHC
Revenue – $3.12B $10.85B
Gross profit – $1.23B $7.80B
Operating income – $453.92M $883.00M
Net income – $215.32M -$1.10B
Free cash flow – $83.11M $1.43B
R&D – $175.57M $663.00M
EPS (diluted) – $0.48 $-2.90
Cash & equivalents $11.52M $127.64M $1.83B
Total debt $8.25M $2.67B $20.74B
Shares (diluted) 3.78M 328.10M 378.10M
Enterprise value -$22.19M $5.97B -$3.39B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBGMAMRXBHC
P/E – 42.6x -2.2x
P/FCF – 80.8x 1.7x
P/Operating cash flow – 33.4x 1.3x
P/S – 2.2x 0.2x
P/B 0.1x 203.3x -1.3x
P/Tangible book 0.1x -12.1x -0.4x
EV/EBITDA – 13.9x 10.0x
EV/EBIT – 20.4x 24.1x
EV/Revenue – 3.0x 2.0x
EV/FCF – 111.4x 14.9x
EV/Operating cash flow – 46.1x 11.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.18 0.03

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBGMAMRXBHC
Revenue growth (1Y) – 9.3% 10.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 10.5% 9.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 14.1% 11.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 14.9% 9.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) – 20.6% -44.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 32.5% 14.1%
Net income growth (1Y) – 426.4% -1,721%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 139.1% -76.0%
EPS growth (1Y) – 4,481% -1,206%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 237.0% -79.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -42.8% 19.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 0.4% 83.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -69.3% 28.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -17.3% 62.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBGMAMRXBHC
Gross margin – 39.3% 71.8%
EBITDA margin – 21.3% 19.6%
Operating margin – 14.6% 8.1%
Pretax margin – 6.5% -6.7%
Net margin – 5.0% -10.1%
FCF margin – 2.7% 13.2%
Operating cash flow margin – 6.4% 16.6%
Return on equity – – –
Return on assets – 5.9% -4.4%
Return on invested capital – 17.4% 4.6%
Return on capital employed – 16.4% 4.4%
Asset turnover – 0.9x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.9x -1.6x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.1% 2.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBGMAMRXBHC
Debt / assets 0.2% 70.7% 83.7%
Debt / equity 0.0x 80.9x -11.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.8x 8.9x
Debt / FCF – 32.1x 14.5x
Liabilities / assets 8.4% 99.1% 107.1%
Equity / assets 91.6% 0.9% -7.1%
Interest coverage – – 0.5x
Current ratio 1.3x 2.2x 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.4x 1.3x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.1x 0.4x
Altman Z-score – 2.48 0.09

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBGMAMRXBHC
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 0.0% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBGMAMRXBHC
Forward P/E – 21.7xFY2026 1.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.97FY2026 $4.86FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +16.9%FY2026 +26.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +26.8% -13.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $3.24BFY2026 $11.45BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +7.4%FY2026 +11.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +12.4% -0.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBGMAMRXBHC
Held by institutions – 51.1% 63.3%
Institutions holding – 310 221
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.3% +1.9%
Institutions buying – 182 99
Institutions selling – 86 63
Buyers to sellers – 2.12 1.57

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BGMAMRXBHC
BGM 1.00 -0.01 -0.03
AMRX -0.01 1.00 0.14
BHC -0.03 0.14 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BGM, AMRX and BHC?

Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bgm (BGM) $32.85M, Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) $6.78B, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) $2.35B.

Which company is growing faster?

Bausch Health Companies (BHC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) +9.3%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) +10.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) has the highest net margin (Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) 5.0%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) -10.1%). On return on invested capital, Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) leads (Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) 17.4%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) 4.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) returned the most: Bgm (BGM) -10.1%, Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) +99.2%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) +2.6%. Over five years, Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) compounded fastest (Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) +31.6%/yr, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) -25.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) has been the steadiest (Bgm (BGM) 380.3%, Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) 35.1%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) 54.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BGM, AMRX and BHC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Amneal Pharmaceuticals (AMRX) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.