BEEP vs HPP vs UHT Stock Comparison

Mobile Infrastructure, Hudson Pacific Properties and Universal Health Realty Income Trust Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

Universal Health Realty Income Trust leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Universal Health Realty Income Trust 3, Hudson Pacific Properties 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBEEPHPPUHTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $102.32M $602.09M $510.78M HPP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -4.2x -1.3x 25.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 20.1x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -4.1% +1.8% — HPP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -69.7% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 8.12% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -30.3% -36.8% +0.8% UHT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -23.5%/yr -42.8%/yr -8.9%/yr UHT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 73.9% 71.8% 23.7% UHT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

BEEPHPPUHT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBEEPHPPUHT
Valuation 60 #58 of 145 82 #27 of 145 26 #108 of 145
Growth 49 #72 of 141 12 #124 of 141 –
Profitability 5 #127 of 134 – –
Financial Health 49 #71 of 138 – –
Shareholder Returns 97 #5 of 131 – 95 #8 of 131
Overall 52 – –
  • BEEP ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • HPP ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • UHT ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBEEPHPPUHTSPY
1 month -9.4%-4.7%-4.9% -0.2%
3 months +43.6%-21.4%-18.8% +3.9%
6 months +20.9%+13.4%-9.9% +8.2%
Year to date +2.0%+2.5%-6.3% +12.9%
1 year -30.3%-36.8%+0.8% +12.3%
3 years -29.7%-65.0%-3.4% +87.4%
3 years, per year -11.1%-29.5%-1.1% +23.3%
5 years -73.8%-93.8%-37.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year -23.5%-42.8%-8.9% +10.9%
10 years —-95.2%-35.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year —-26.2%-4.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBEEPHPPUHTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 73.9%71.8%23.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 67.2%69.6%26.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.371.21-0.09 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.41-0.510.03 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -90.8%-97.2%-46.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -30.3%-36.8%-19.8% -1.2%
52-week high $3.73$17.57$45.82 $779.14
52-week low $1.38$5.51$36.41 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBEEPHPPUHT
P/E now vs peer median -4.2xmedian 26.3x -1.3xmedian 26.3x 25.2xmedian 26.3x
P/S now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 4.0x 0.7xmedian 4.0x 5.3xmedian 4.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.4x —median 14.4x —median 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 23.3x —median 23.3x 11.0xmedian 23.3x
P/B now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 1.3x —median 1.3x 3.7xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.14median 1.91 0.05median 1.91 5.21median 1.91

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBEEPHPPUHT
Revenue $34.67M $812.79M –
Net income -$25.75M -$579.85M –
Free cash flow $29.23M – –
EPS (diluted) $-1.12 $-8.87 $1.45
Cash & equivalents $10.91M $80.76M $6.47M
Total debt $180.89M – –
Shares (diluted) 21.62M 64.46M 13.88M
Enterprise value $67.49M $602.09M $510.78M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBEEPHPPUHT
P/E -4.2x -1.3x 25.2x
P/FCF 3.5x – 11.0x
P/Operating cash flow 136.2x – –
P/S 3.0x 0.7x 5.3x
P/B 0.7x – 3.7x
P/Tangible book 0.7x – 3.7x
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT – – –
EV/Revenue 7.9x 0.7x –
EV/FCF 9.3x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 362.6x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.14 0.05 5.21

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBEEPHPPUHT
Revenue growth (1Y) -4.1% 1.8% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.2% -7.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -116.0% -29.3% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -14.6% -114.5% –
EPS growth (1Y) -105.9% 39.2% 12.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -30.4% -27.7% 4.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 60.5% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 52.4% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 527.4% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 161.5% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBEEPHPPUHT
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – – –
Net margin -69.7% – –
FCF margin 84.3% – –
Operating cash flow margin 2.2% – –
Return on equity -17.3% – –
Return on assets -7.1% -8.1% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.1x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x – –
Stock comp / revenue 9.3% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBEEPHPPUHT
Debt / assets 50.5% – –
Debt / equity 1.2x – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF 6.2x – –
Liabilities / assets 59.0% 57.6% 75.7%
Equity / assets 41.0% – 24.3%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBEEPHPPUHT
Dividend yield – – 8.1%
Net buyback yield 8.2% – –
Shareholder yield 8.2% 0.0% 8.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBEEPHPPUHT
Forward P/E – – 20.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.36FY2026 $-3.72FY2026 $1.83FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +44.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – -7.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $33.31MFY2026 $744.06MFY2026 $104.34MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -5.1%FY2026 -10.5%FY2026 +5.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.0% -0.8% -5.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBEEPHPPUHT
Held by institutions 67.0% 100.0% 61.7%
Institutions holding 60 189 184
Change in shares held, QoQ -3.4% +4.8% +18.8%
Institutions buying 31 118 93
Institutions selling 21 52 53
Buyers to sellers 1.48 2.27 1.75

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BEEPHPPUHT
BEEP 1.00 0.04 0.02
HPP 0.04 1.00 0.22
UHT 0.02 0.22 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BEEP, HPP and UHT?

Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) $102.32M, Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) $602.09M, Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) $510.78M.

Which company is growing faster?

Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) -4.1%, Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) +1.8%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) returned the most: Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) -30.3%, Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) -36.8%, Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) +0.8%. Over five years, Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) compounded fastest (Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) -23.5%/yr, Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) -42.8%/yr, Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) -8.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) 0.00%, Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) 8.12%. Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) and Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) has been the steadiest (Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) 73.9%, Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) 71.8%, Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) 23.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BEEP, HPP and UHT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.