BEEP vs HPP vs ACR Stock Comparison

Mobile Infrastructure, Hudson Pacific Properties and ACRES Commercial Realty Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

Hudson Pacific Properties leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (Hudson Pacific Properties 2, ACRES Commercial Realty 2, Mobile Infrastructure 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBEEPHPPACRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $100.23M $716.17M $87.40M HPP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -4.2x -1.3x 3.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 46.0x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -4.1% +1.8% — HPP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -69.7% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -31.6% -35.7% -37.8% BEEP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -23.9%/yr -42.6%/yr -5.5%/yr ACR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 74.0% 71.9% 39.9% ACR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

BEEPHPPACR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBEEPHPPACR
Valuation 61 #57 of 145 81 #28 of 145 100 #1 of 170
Growth 50 #71 of 142 11 #126 of 142 –
Profitability 5 #129 of 136 – –
Financial Health 49 #71 of 139 – 21 #125 of 158
Shareholder Returns 97 #5 of 131 – –
Overall 53 – –
  • BEEP ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • HPP ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • ACR ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBEEPHPPACRSPY
1 month -11.8%-2.3%+13.7% -0.8%
3 months +43.7%-22.2%-33.5% +3.5%
6 months +21.6%+25.6%-41.3% +7.0%
Year to date -0.8%+5.1%-44.0% +12.2%
1 year -31.6%-35.7%-37.8% +13.0%
3 years -31.6%-64.1%+62.1% +86.3%
3 years, per year -11.9%-29.0%+17.5% +23.1%
5 years -74.5%-93.8%-24.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year -23.9%-42.6%-5.5% +11.0%
10 years —-95.1%-68.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year —-26.0%-10.9% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBEEPHPPACRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 74.0%71.9%39.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 67.2%69.7%41.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.361.22-0.02 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.43-0.50-0.95 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -90.8%-97.2%-58.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -32.2%-35.2%-50.2% -1.8%
52-week high $3.73$17.57$24.04 $779.14
52-week low $1.38$5.51$9.99 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBEEPHPPACR
P/E now vs peer median -4.1xmedian 27.4x -1.3xmedian 27.4x 3.0xmedian 11.0x
P/S now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 4.2x 0.8xmedian 4.2x —median 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.2x —median 14.2x —median 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 3.4xmedian 23.2x —median 23.2x —median 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 1.3x —median 1.3x 0.2xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.14median 2.11 0.05median 2.11 —median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBEEPHPPACR
Revenue $34.67M $812.79M –
Net income -$25.75M -$579.85M $27.98M
Free cash flow $29.23M – –
EPS (diluted) $-1.12 $-8.87 –
Cash & equivalents $10.91M $80.76M $83.77M
Total debt $180.89M – $1.54B
Shares (diluted) 21.62M 64.46M 7.31M
Enterprise value $47.79M $716.17M -$146.08M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBEEPHPPACR
P/E -4.1x -1.3x 3.0x
P/FCF 3.4x – –
P/Operating cash flow 132.6x – –
P/S 2.9x 0.8x –
P/B 0.7x – 0.2x
P/Tangible book 0.7x – 0.2x
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT – – –
EV/Revenue 7.8x 0.8x –
EV/FCF 9.2x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 358.9x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.14 0.05 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBEEPHPPACR
Revenue growth (1Y) -4.1% 1.8% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.2% -7.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -116.0% -29.3% -2.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -14.6% -114.5% 39.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -105.9% 39.2% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -30.4% -27.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 60.5% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 52.4% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 527.4% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 161.5% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBEEPHPPACR
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – – –
Net margin -69.7% – –
FCF margin 84.3% – –
Operating cash flow margin 2.2% – –
Return on equity -17.3% – –
Return on assets -7.1% -8.1% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.1x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x – –
Stock comp / revenue 9.3% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBEEPHPPACR
Debt / assets 50.5% – 71.4%
Debt / equity 1.2x – 2.8x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF 6.2x – –
Liabilities / assets 59.0% 57.6% 74.5%
Equity / assets 41.0% – 25.5%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBEEPHPPACR
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 8.5% – –
Shareholder yield 8.5% 0.0% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBEEPHPPACR
Forward P/E – – 46.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.36FY2026 $-3.72FY2026 $0.26FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +576.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $33.31MFY2026 $744.06MFY2026 $79.33MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -5.1%FY2026 -10.5%FY2026 -0.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.0% -0.8% -11.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBEEPHPPACR
Held by institutions 67.0% 100.0% 42.6%
Institutions holding 60 189 67
Change in shares held, QoQ -3.4% +4.8% -5.2%
Institutions buying 31 118 24
Institutions selling 21 52 25
Buyers to sellers 1.48 2.27 0.96

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BEEPHPPACR
BEEP 1.00 0.04 0.03
HPP 0.04 1.00 0.15
ACR 0.03 0.15 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BEEP, HPP and ACR?

Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) $100.23M, Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) $716.17M, ACRES Commercial Realty (ACR) $87.40M.

Which company is growing faster?

Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) -4.1%, Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) +1.8%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) returned the most: Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) -31.6%, Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) -35.7%, ACRES Commercial Realty (ACR) -37.8%. Over five years, ACRES Commercial Realty (ACR) compounded fastest (Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) -23.9%/yr, Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) -42.6%/yr, ACRES Commercial Realty (ACR) -5.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, ACRES Commercial Realty (ACR) has been the steadiest (Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) 74.0%, Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) 71.9%, ACRES Commercial Realty (ACR) 39.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BEEP, HPP and ACR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.