BEEP vs CXW vs RPT Stock Comparison

Mobile Infrastructure, CoreCivic and Rithm Property Trust Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CXW CoreCivic, Inc.
$30.79 -4.2% 1M +65.9% 1Y
Market cap
$3.04B
P/E
23.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.48B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
7 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

CoreCivic leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (CoreCivic 7, Rithm Property Trust 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBEEPCXWRPTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $102.32M $3.04B $86.28M CXW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -4.2x 23.8x 71.1x CXW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 1.8x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -4.1% +24.3% — CXW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -69.7% 5.1% — CXW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 6.6% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.2x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 12.97% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -30.3% +65.9% -24.8% CXW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -23.5%/yr +29.2%/yr -33.5%/yr CXW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 73.9% 42.0% 39.1% RPT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 53/100 — CXW

Percentile Scorecard

BEEPCXWRPT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBEEPCXWRPT
Valuation 60 #58 of 145 48 #59 of 112 60 #59 of 145
Growth 49 #72 of 141 45 #53 of 96 –
Profitability 5 #127 of 134 51 #45 of 91 –
Financial Health 49 #71 of 138 40 #76 of 125 –
Shareholder Returns 97 #5 of 131 82 #13 of 67 99 #3 of 131
Overall 52 53 –
  • BEEP ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • CXW ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • RPT ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBEEPCXWRPTSPY
1 month -9.4%-4.2%+2.5% -0.2%
3 months +43.6%+0.6%-8.6% +3.9%
6 months +20.9%+49.7%-23.2% +8.2%
Year to date +2.0%+61.1%-33.1% +12.9%
1 year -30.3%+65.9%-24.8% +12.3%
3 years -29.7%+149.1%-55.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year -11.1%+35.6%-23.6% +23.3%
5 years -73.8%+259.7%-86.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year -23.5%+29.2%-33.5% +10.9%
10 years —+130.6%-86.1% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+8.7%-17.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBEEPCXWRPTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 73.9%42.0%39.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 67.2%43.8%38.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.370.370.40 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.411.57-0.63 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -90.8%-39.7%-88.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -30.3%-13.3%-37.9% -1.2%
52-week high $3.73$35.53$17.88 $779.14
52-week low $1.38$16.13$10.41 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBEEPCXWRPT
P/E now vs peer median -4.2xmedian 26.3x 23.8xmedian 21.2x 71.1xmedian 26.3x
P/S now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 4.0x 1.2xmedian 0.9x 4.8xmedian 4.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.4x 11.0xmedian 11.9x —median 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 23.3x 53.1xmedian 13.7x -7.9xmedian 23.3x
P/B now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 1.3x 2.1xmedian 2.4x 0.3xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.14median 1.91 3.36median 1.00 2.69median 1.91

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBEEPCXWRPT
Revenue $34.67M $2.48B –
Net income -$25.75M $127.90M –
Free cash flow $29.23M $57.32M –
EPS (diluted) $-1.12 $1.29 $0.16
Cash & equivalents $10.91M $108.93M $45.25M
Total debt $180.89M $5.01B –
Shares (diluted) 21.62M 98.89M 7.75M
Enterprise value $67.49M $2.57B $85.82M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBEEPCXWRPT
P/E -4.2x 23.8x 71.1x
P/FCF 3.5x 53.1x -7.9x
P/Operating cash flow 136.2x 15.2x –
P/S 3.0x 1.2x 4.8x
P/B 0.7x 2.1x 0.3x
P/Tangible book 0.7x 2.1x 0.3x
EV/EBITDA – 11.0x –
EV/EBIT – 17.3x –
EV/Revenue 7.9x 1.7x –
EV/FCF 9.3x 74.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow 362.6x 21.4x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.14 3.36 2.69

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBEEPCXWRPT
Revenue growth (1Y) -4.1% 24.3% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.2% 10.2% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -116.0% 22.9% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -14.6% 2.2% –
EPS growth (1Y) -105.9% 35.1% 166.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -30.4% 7.1% 26.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 60.5% -26.4% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 52.4% 2.6% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 527.4% -66.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 161.5% -19.8% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBEEPCXWRPT
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 15.6% –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – 7.0% –
Net margin -69.7% 5.1% –
FCF margin 84.3% 2.3% –
Operating cash flow margin 2.2% 8.1% –
Return on equity -17.3% 9.0% –
Return on assets -7.1% 3.7% –
Return on invested capital – 6.6% –
Return on capital employed – 8.5% –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.7x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x 1.6x –
Stock comp / revenue 9.3% 1.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBEEPCXWRPT
Debt / assets 50.5% 39.0% –
Debt / equity 1.2x 0.9x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.2x –
Debt / FCF 6.2x 23.5x –
Liabilities / assets 59.0% 58.4% 70.3%
Equity / assets 41.0% 41.6% 29.7%
Interest coverage – 3.3x –
Current ratio – 1.3x –
Quick ratio – 1.1x –
Cash ratio – 0.2x –
Altman Z-score – 1.90 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBEEPCXWRPT
Dividend yield – – 13.0%
Net buyback yield 8.2% 6.2% –
Shareholder yield 8.2% 6.2% 13.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBEEPCXWRPT
Forward P/E – 1.8xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.36FY2026 $16.94FY2026 $-0.06FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +1,468.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – -85.4% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $33.31MFY2026 $2.85BFY2026 $28.82MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -5.1%FY2026 +29.1%FY2026 +64.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.0% -0.2% +13.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBEEPCXWRPT
Held by institutions 67.0% 87.5% 63.8%
Institutions holding 60 278 52
Change in shares held, QoQ -3.4% +0.2% -9.0%
Institutions buying 31 155 24
Institutions selling 21 86 21
Buyers to sellers 1.48 1.80 1.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BEEPCXWRPT
BEEP 1.00 0.13 0.07
CXW 0.13 1.00 0.05
RPT 0.07 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BEEP, CXW and RPT?

CoreCivic (CXW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) $102.32M, CoreCivic (CXW) $3.04B, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) $86.28M.

Which stock is cheaper, BEEP, CXW and RPT?

CoreCivic (CXW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) -4.2x, CoreCivic (CXW) 23.8x, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) 71.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

CoreCivic (CXW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) -4.1%, CoreCivic (CXW) +24.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

CoreCivic (CXW) has the highest net margin (Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) -69.7%, CoreCivic (CXW) 5.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year CoreCivic (CXW) returned the most: Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) -30.3%, CoreCivic (CXW) +65.9%, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) -24.8%. Over five years, CoreCivic (CXW) compounded fastest (Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) -23.5%/yr, CoreCivic (CXW) +29.2%/yr, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) -33.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: CoreCivic (CXW) 0.00%, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) 12.97%. Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) and CoreCivic (CXW) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) has been the steadiest (Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) 73.9%, CoreCivic (CXW) 42.0%, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) 39.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BEEP, CXW and RPT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, CoreCivic (CXW) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.