BEEP vs CXW vs EPR Stock Comparison

Mobile Infrastructure, CoreCivic and Epr Properties Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CXW CoreCivic, Inc.
$30.79 -4.2% 1M +65.9% 1Y
Market cap
$3.04B
P/E
23.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.48B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
5 wins
EPR Epr Properties
$56.01 -1.4% 1M +4.8% 1Y
Market cap
$4.29B
P/E
17.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$742.59M
Div. yield
6.50%
Gaming REITs Real Estate
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Epr Properties leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Epr Properties 6, CoreCivic 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBEEPCXWEPRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $102.32M $3.04B $4.29B EPR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -4.2x 23.8x 17.9x EPR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 1.8x 18.7x CXW
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -4.1% +24.3% +4.5% CXW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -69.7% 5.1% 32.2% EPR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 6.6% 7.5% EPR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.2x 5.5x CXW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 6.50% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -30.3% +65.9% +4.8% CXW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -23.5%/yr +29.2%/yr +1.6%/yr CXW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 73.9% 42.0% 22.7% EPR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 53/100 64/100 EPR

Percentile Scorecard

BEEPCXWEPR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBEEPCXWEPR
Valuation 60 #58 of 145 48 #59 of 112 56 #65 of 145
Growth 49 #72 of 141 45 #53 of 96 55 #64 of 141
Profitability 5 #127 of 134 51 #45 of 91 87 #19 of 134
Financial Health 49 #71 of 138 40 #76 of 125 37 #87 of 138
Shareholder Returns 97 #5 of 131 82 #13 of 67 84 #22 of 131
Overall 52 53 64
  • BEEP ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • CXW ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • EPR ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBEEPCXWEPRSPY
1 month -9.4%-4.2%-1.4% -0.2%
3 months +43.6%+0.6%-12.9% +3.9%
6 months +20.9%+49.7%-0.8% +8.2%
Year to date +2.0%+61.1%+12.2% +12.9%
1 year -30.3%+65.9%+4.8% +12.3%
3 years -29.7%+149.1%+37.2% +87.4%
3 years, per year -11.1%+35.6%+11.1% +23.3%
5 years -73.8%+259.7%+8.4% +67.9%
5 years, per year -23.5%+29.2%+1.6% +10.9%
10 years —+130.6%-21.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+8.7%-2.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBEEPCXWEPRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 73.9%42.0%22.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 67.2%43.8%23.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.370.370.08 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.411.570.21 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -90.8%-39.7%-38.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -30.3%-13.3%-12.9% -1.2%
52-week high $3.73$35.53$64.31 $779.14
52-week low $1.38$16.13$48.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBEEPCXWEPR
P/E now vs peer median -4.2xmedian 26.3x 23.8xmedian 21.2x 17.9xmedian 26.3x
P/S now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 4.0x 1.2xmedian 0.9x 5.8xmedian 4.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.4x 11.0xmedian 11.9x 12.6xmedian 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 23.3x 53.1xmedian 13.7x -21.3xmedian 23.3x
P/B now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 1.3x 2.1xmedian 2.4x 1.9xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.14median 1.91 3.36median 1.00 0.95median 1.91

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBEEPCXWEPR
Revenue $34.67M $2.48B $742.59M
Operating income – – $409.10M
Net income -$25.75M $127.90M $263.27M
Free cash flow $29.23M $57.32M -$200.99M
EPS (diluted) $-1.12 $1.29 $3.10
Cash & equivalents $10.91M $108.93M $16.20M
Total debt $180.89M $5.01B $3.29B
Shares (diluted) 21.62M 98.89M 77.02M
Enterprise value $67.49M $2.57B $4.10B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBEEPCXWEPR
P/E -4.2x 23.8x 17.9x
P/FCF 3.5x 53.1x -21.3x
P/Operating cash flow 136.2x 15.2x 9.7x
P/S 3.0x 1.2x 5.8x
P/B 0.7x 2.1x 1.9x
P/Tangible book 0.7x 2.1x 1.9x
EV/EBITDA – 11.0x 12.6x
EV/EBIT – 17.3x 18.5x
EV/Revenue 7.9x 1.7x 10.2x
EV/FCF 9.3x 74.7x -37.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 362.6x 21.4x 17.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.14 3.36 0.95

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBEEPCXWEPR
Revenue growth (1Y) -4.1% 24.3% 4.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.2% 10.2% 2.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 16.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 11.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -116.0% 22.9% 46.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -14.6% 2.2% 17.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -105.9% 35.1% 52.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -30.4% 7.1% 18.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 60.5% -26.4% 9.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 52.4% 2.6% -0.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 527.4% -66.4% -171.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 161.5% -19.8% -39.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBEEPCXWEPR
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 15.6% 80.6%
Operating margin – – 55.1%
Pretax margin – 7.0% 35.8%
Net margin -69.7% 5.1% 32.2%
FCF margin 84.3% 2.3% -27.1%
Operating cash flow margin 2.2% 8.1% 59.4%
Return on equity -17.3% 9.0% 11.4%
Return on assets -7.1% 3.7% 4.5%
Return on invested capital – 6.6% 7.5%
Return on capital employed – 8.5% –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.7x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x 1.6x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 9.3% 1.1% 2.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBEEPCXWEPR
Debt / assets 50.5% 39.0% 54.4%
Debt / equity 1.2x 0.9x 1.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.2x 5.5x
Debt / FCF 6.2x 23.5x -16.4x
Liabilities / assets 59.0% 58.4% 61.8%
Equity / assets 41.0% 41.6% 38.2%
Interest coverage – 3.3x 2.9x
Current ratio – 1.3x –
Quick ratio – 1.1x –
Cash ratio – 0.2x –
Altman Z-score – 1.90 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBEEPCXWEPR
Dividend yield – – 6.5%
Net buyback yield 8.2% 6.2% 0.3%
Shareholder yield 8.2% 6.2% 6.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBEEPCXWEPR
Forward P/E – 1.8xFY2026 18.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.36FY2026 $16.94FY2026 $3.00FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +1,468.5%FY2026 -8.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -85.4% +8.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $33.31MFY2026 $2.85BFY2026 $692.91MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -5.1%FY2026 +29.1%FY2026 +13.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.0% -0.2% -2.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBEEPCXWEPR
Held by institutions 67.0% 87.5% 82.8%
Institutions holding 60 278 486
Change in shares held, QoQ -3.4% +0.2% +4.0%
Institutions buying 31 155 246
Institutions selling 21 86 157
Buyers to sellers 1.48 1.80 1.57

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BEEPCXWEPR
BEEP 1.00 0.13 0.04
CXW 0.13 1.00 0.08
EPR 0.04 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BEEP, CXW and EPR?

Epr Properties (EPR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) $102.32M, CoreCivic (CXW) $3.04B, Epr Properties (EPR) $4.29B.

Which stock is cheaper, BEEP, CXW and EPR?

Epr Properties (EPR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) -4.2x, CoreCivic (CXW) 23.8x, Epr Properties (EPR) 17.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, CoreCivic (CXW) is cheapest (CoreCivic (CXW) 1.8x, Epr Properties (EPR) 18.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

CoreCivic (CXW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) -4.1%, CoreCivic (CXW) +24.3%, Epr Properties (EPR) +4.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Epr Properties (EPR) has the highest net margin (Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) -69.7%, CoreCivic (CXW) 5.1%, Epr Properties (EPR) 32.2%). On return on invested capital, Epr Properties (EPR) leads (CoreCivic (CXW) 6.6%, Epr Properties (EPR) 7.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year CoreCivic (CXW) returned the most: Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) -30.3%, CoreCivic (CXW) +65.9%, Epr Properties (EPR) +4.8%. Over five years, CoreCivic (CXW) compounded fastest (Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) -23.5%/yr, CoreCivic (CXW) +29.2%/yr, Epr Properties (EPR) +1.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: CoreCivic (CXW) 0.00%, Epr Properties (EPR) 6.50%. Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) and CoreCivic (CXW) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Epr Properties (EPR) has been the steadiest (Mobile Infrastructure (BEEP) 73.9%, CoreCivic (CXW) 42.0%, Epr Properties (EPR) 22.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BEEP, CXW and EPR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Epr Properties (EPR) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.