BEEM vs CHPT vs WBX Stock Comparison

Beam Global, ChargePoint Holdings and Wallbox Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BEEM Beam Global
$0.91 -23.5% 1M -69.8% 1Y
Market cap
$19.60M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$26.53M
Div. yield
–
EV Charging Industrials
1 win
WBX Wallbox N.V.
$2.70 -4.6% 1M -45.5% 1Y
Market cap
$419.19M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
EV Charging Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

ChargePoint Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (ChargePoint Holdings 5, Wallbox 2, Beam Global 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBEEMCHPTWBXLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $19.60M $231.24M $419.19M WBX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.1x -1.3x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -20.5% +8.8% — CHPT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -64.5% -40.6% — CHPT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -82.8% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.1x -0.9x — CHPT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -69.8% -25.0% -45.5% CHPT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -49.5%/yr -55.2%/yr -28.6%/yr WBX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 78.9% 95.0% 86.9% BEEM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 29/100 42/100 — CHPT

Percentile Scorecard

BEEMCHPTWBX

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBEEMCHPTWBX
Valuation 25 #46 of 61 30 #43 of 61 –
Growth 25 #44 of 58 77 #14 of 58 –
Profitability 32 #38 of 55 43 #32 of 55 –
Financial Health 39 #44 of 71 13 #62 of 71 7 #66 of 71
Shareholder Returns 25 #22 of 29 46 #16 of 29 –
Overall 29 42 –
  • BEEM ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • CHPT ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • WBX ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBEEMCHPTWBXSPY
1 month -23.5%-7.7%-4.6% -0.8%
3 months -13.3%+52.5%-28.9% +3.5%
6 months -51.1%+21.5%-15.6% +7.0%
Year to date -39.3%+24.2%+15.4% +12.2%
1 year -69.8%-25.0%-45.5% +13.0%
3 years -83.5%-83.4%+57.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year -45.2%-45.1%+16.2% +23.1%
5 years -96.7%-98.2%-81.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year -49.5%-55.2%-28.6% +11.0%
10 years -89.0%—— +258.0%
10 years, per year -19.8%—— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBEEMCHPTWBXSPY
Volatility, 1Y 78.9%95.0%86.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 78.0%75.0%73.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.603.051.38 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.88-0.26-0.52 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -97.8%-99.2%-98.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -68.5%-25.1%-51.5% -1.8%
52-week high $2.89$11.02$5.57 $779.14
52-week low $0.87$4.51$2.34 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBEEMCHPTWBX
P/E now vs peer median -1.2xmedian 25.4x -1.2xmedian 25.4x —median 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 2.1x 0.5xmedian 2.1x —median 2.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -1.4xmedian 17.5x -2.4xmedian 17.5x —median 17.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.6xmedian 27.3x -3.2xmedian 27.3x —median 27.3x
P/B now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.7x -6.1xmedian 1.7x -6.1xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.03median 0.77 -0.04median 0.77 —median 0.77

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBEEMCHPTWBX
Revenue $26.53M $432.89M –
Gross profit $2.70M $138.81M –
Operating income -$17.23M -$178.53M –
Net income -$17.11M -$175.73M –
Free cash flow -$12.98M -$68.43M –
R&D – $137.29M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.97 $-6.68 –
Cash & equivalents $1.03M $95.33M $22.78M
Total debt $165.00K $236.94M $238.51M
Shares (diluted) 17.69M 26.32M 444.00K
Enterprise value $12.26M -$281.95M $293.32M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBEEMCHPTWBX
P/E -1.2x -1.2x –
P/FCF -1.6x -3.2x –
P/Operating cash flow -1.5x -3.4x –
P/S 0.8x 0.5x –
P/B 1.0x -6.1x -6.1x
P/Tangible book 1.5x -2.5x -3.6x
EV/EBITDA -1.4x -2.4x –
EV/EBIT -1.1x -2.0x –
EV/Revenue 0.7x 0.8x –
EV/FCF -1.5x -5.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow -1.5x -5.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.03 -0.04 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBEEMCHPTWBX
Revenue growth (1Y) -20.5% 8.8% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -16.4% -8.2% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -50.0% 26.0% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 92.1% 16.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 27.7% 24.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 7.8% 21.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) 25.9% 32.3% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -39.1% 21.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) 35.1% 40.4% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -35.4% 31.4% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -214.6% 10.8% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.7% 41.6% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -132.1% 13.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.5% 41.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBEEMCHPTWBX
Gross margin 10.2% 32.1% –
EBITDA margin -51.9% -34.6% –
Operating margin -64.9% -41.2% –
Pretax margin -64.9% -39.4% –
Net margin -64.5% -40.6% –
FCF margin -48.9% -15.8% –
Operating cash flow margin -49.8% -14.9% –
Return on equity -82.4% – –
Return on assets -44.1% -24.8% –
Return on invested capital – -82.8% –
Return on capital employed -64.0% -51.2% –
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.6x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x 0.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 5.9% 11.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBEEMCHPTWBX
Debt / assets 0.4% 34.1% 86.2%
Debt / equity 0.0x -6.6x -3.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.1x -0.9x –
Debt / FCF 0.0x -3.5x –
Liabilities / assets 46.9% 105.2% 124.6%
Equity / assets 53.1% -5.2% -24.6%
Interest coverage -861.4x -16.0x –
Current ratio 1.5x 1.1x 1.0x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.5x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.3x 0.2x
Altman Z-score -5.14 -4.41 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBEEMCHPTWBX
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -15.0% -0.5% –
Shareholder yield -15.0% -0.5% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBEEMCHPTWBX
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.72FY2026 $-5.07FY2026 $-3.38FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year $27.60MFY2026 $461.54MFY2026 $160.28MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -2.3%FY2026 +12.2%FY2026 -6.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +23.1% +3.7% +149.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBEEMCHPTWBX
Held by institutions 9.8% 32.2% –
Institutions holding 50 165 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -14.9% +81.9% –
Institutions buying 26 79 –
Institutions selling 9 26 –
Buyers to sellers 2.89 3.04 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BEEMCHPTWBX
BEEM 1.00 0.33 0.17
CHPT 0.33 1.00 0.17
WBX 0.17 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BEEM, CHPT and WBX?

Wallbox (WBX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Beam Global (BEEM) $19.60M, ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) $231.24M, Wallbox (WBX) $419.19M.

Which company is growing faster?

ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Beam Global (BEEM) -20.5%, ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) +8.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) has the highest net margin (Beam Global (BEEM) -64.5%, ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) -40.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) returned the most: Beam Global (BEEM) -69.8%, ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) -25.0%, Wallbox (WBX) -45.5%. Over five years, Wallbox (WBX) compounded fastest (Beam Global (BEEM) -49.5%/yr, ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) -55.2%/yr, Wallbox (WBX) -28.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Beam Global (BEEM) has been the steadiest (Beam Global (BEEM) 78.9%, ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) 95.0%, Wallbox (WBX) 86.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BEEM, CHPT and WBX?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.