BDX vs DHR vs ILMN Stock Comparison

Becton Dickinson, Danaher and Illumina Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BDX Becton Dickinson & Co
$198.85 +8.8% 1M +6.6% 1Y
Market cap
$53.87B
P/E
57.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$23.25B
Div. yield
–
Medical Supplies Healthcare
4 wins
DHR Danaher Corp /De/
$230.44 +3.9% 1M +3.5% 1Y
Market cap
$164.19B
P/E
41.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.11B
Div. yield
–
Life Sciences Tools Healthcare
3 wins
ILMN Illumina, Inc.
$269.42 +5.5% 1M +169.5% 1Y
Market cap
$40.91B
P/E
49.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.49B
Div. yield
–
Life Sciences Tools Healthcare
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Becton Dickinson leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Becton Dickinson 4, Illumina 4, Danaher 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBDXDHRILMNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $53.87B $164.19B $40.91B DHR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 57.2x 41.0x 49.6x DHR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 15.3x 25.5x 53.9x BDX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.4% +4.6% +4.9% BDX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.0% 15.9% 18.4% ILMN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.3% 5.7% 15.1% ILMN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.2x 2.9x 0.7x ILMN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +6.6% +3.5% +169.5% ILMN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -4.3%/yr -6.0%/yr -7.5%/yr BDX
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.8% 30.6% 50.3% DHR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 67/100 60/100 65/100 BDX

Percentile Scorecard

BDXDHRILMN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBDXDHRILMN
Valuation 89 #25 of 228 67 #75 of 228 52 #111 of 228
Growth 48 #117 of 222 20 #178 of 222 43 #126 of 222
Profitability 78 #48 of 210 88 #27 of 210 97 #7 of 210
Financial Health 26 #178 of 241 46 #131 of 241 51 #118 of 241
Shareholder Returns 95 #8 of 138 77 #32 of 138 84 #23 of 138
Overall 67 60 65
  • BDX ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • DHR ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • ILMN ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBDXDHRILMNSPY
1 month +8.8%+3.9%+5.5% -1.0%
3 months +27.2%+20.3%+38.8% +2.9%
6 months +30.7%+30.0%+110.7% +6.4%
Year to date +2.5%+0.7%+105.4% +11.4%
1 year +6.6%+3.5%+169.5% +13.1%
3 years -23.3%+17.1%+138.6% +79.4%
3 years, per year -8.5%+5.4%+33.6% +21.5%
5 years -19.5%-26.5%-32.3% +67.7%
5 years, per year -4.3%-6.0%-7.5% +10.9%
10 years +15.4%+187.4%+95.3% +255.2%
10 years, per year +1.4%+11.1%+6.9% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureBDXDHRILMNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.8%30.6%50.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.1%31.7%39.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.340.440.80 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.210.113.37 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -50.4%-50.8%-82.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -5.3%-4.8%-8.3% -2.5%
52-week high $210.02$242.05$293.69 $779.14
52-week low $140.71$161.91$95.03 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBDXDHRILMN
P/E now vs peer median 58.1xmedian 30.7x 40.6xmedian 30.7x 49.3xmedian 30.7x
P/S now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 3.0x 6.5xmedian 3.0x 9.1xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.1xmedian 17.7x 24.0xmedian 17.7x 36.0xmedian 17.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 16.9xmedian 23.7x 29.6xmedian 23.7x 43.7xmedian 23.7x
P/B now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 2.4x 3.1xmedian 2.4x 14.3xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median -3.98median 0.96 -3.24median 0.96 1.64median 0.96

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBDXDHRILMN
Revenue $23.25B $25.11B $4.49B
Gross profit $10.91B $14.69B $2.98B
Operating income $2.48B $5.13B $882.00M
Net income $941.00M $4.00B $825.00M
Free cash flow $3.20B $5.47B $931.00M
R&D $1.37B $1.62B $960.00M
EPS (diluted) $3.42 $5.66 $5.39
Cash & equivalents $708.00M $4.35B $1.04B
Total debt $72.81B $26.56B $6.97B
Shares (diluted) 275.16M 707.60M 153.00M
Enterprise value $51.02B $148.00B $35.68B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBDXDHRILMN
P/E 58.1x 40.6x 49.3x
P/FCF 16.9x 29.6x 43.7x
P/Operating cash flow 13.7x 24.4x 37.2x
P/S 2.3x 6.5x 9.1x
P/B 2.2x 3.1x 14.3x
P/Tangible book 2.3x 5.2x 16.8x
EV/EBITDA 14.1x 24.0x 36.0x
EV/EBIT 28.3x 35.9x 47.1x
EV/Revenue 3.0x 7.3x 9.2x
EV/FCF 21.9x 33.7x 44.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 17.8x 27.8x 37.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -3.98 -3.24 1.64

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBDXDHRILMN
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.4% 4.6% 4.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.9% -0.5% -1.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 23.7% 2.6% 4.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 8.5% -0.9% 2.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 13.0% 16.1% -31.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 3.3% -7.1% 28.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -40.6% 17.3% -34.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -17.3% -14.3% 30.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -38.0% 19.2% -32.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -14.6% -12.5% 30.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 43.5% 7.6% -5.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.5% -7.6% 38.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 54.2% 12.4% -9.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 22.5% -9.0% 105.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBDXDHRILMN
Gross margin 46.9% 58.5% 66.4%
EBITDA margin 21.4% 30.5% 25.7%
Operating margin 10.7% 20.4% 19.6%
Pretax margin 8.4% 19.0% 22.6%
Net margin 4.0% 15.9% 18.4%
FCF margin 13.8% 21.8% 20.7%
Operating cash flow margin 17.0% 26.4% 24.4%
Return on equity 3.9% 7.6% 29.9%
Return on assets 1.9% 4.5% 12.5%
Return on invested capital 5.3% 5.7% 15.1%
Return on capital employed 6.0% 6.4% 17.5%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.3x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 4.2x 1.7x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 1.2% 1.2% 5.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBDXDHRILMN
Debt / assets 33.1% 28.8% 29.9%
Debt / equity 0.7x 0.5x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.2x 2.9x 0.7x
Debt / FCF 5.2x 4.9x 2.1x
Liabilities / assets 51.9% 43.1% 57.3%
Equity / assets 48.1% 56.9% 42.7%
Interest coverage 4.2x 17.6x 8.9x
Current ratio 0.9x 1.7x 1.8x
Quick ratio 0.3x 1.0x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.5x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 2.31 3.70 7.73

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBDXDHRILMN
Dividend yield 2.1% 0.7% –
Net buyback yield 4.6% 1.8% 1.2%
Shareholder yield 6.7% 2.5% 1.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBDXDHRILMN
Forward P/E 15.3xFY2026 25.5xFY2026 53.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $12.99FY2026 $9.03FY2026 $5.00FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +14.8%FY2026 +15.8%FY2026 +3.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -3.0% +8.9% +25.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.11BFY2026 $27.12BFY2026 $4.52BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -17.1%FY2026 +10.4%FY2026 +4.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.7% -1.6% +12.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBDXDHRILMN
Held by institutions 96.1% 81.9% 100.0%
Institutions holding 1,442 2,115 933
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.6% +1.1% +0.0%
Institutions buying 688 837 463
Institutions selling 543 1,015 330
Buyers to sellers 1.27 0.82 1.40

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BDXDHRILMN
BDX 1.00 0.32 0.05
DHR 0.32 1.00 0.34
ILMN 0.05 0.34 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BDX, DHR and ILMN?

Danaher (DHR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Becton Dickinson (BDX) $53.87B, Danaher (DHR) $164.19B, Illumina (ILMN) $40.91B.

Which stock is cheaper, BDX, DHR and ILMN?

Danaher (DHR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Becton Dickinson (BDX) 57.2x, Danaher (DHR) 41.0x, Illumina (ILMN) 49.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Becton Dickinson (BDX) is cheapest (Becton Dickinson (BDX) 15.3x, Danaher (DHR) 25.5x, Illumina (ILMN) 53.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Becton Dickinson (BDX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Becton Dickinson (BDX) +17.4%, Danaher (DHR) +4.6%, Illumina (ILMN) +4.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Illumina (ILMN) has the highest net margin (Becton Dickinson (BDX) 4.0%, Danaher (DHR) 15.9%, Illumina (ILMN) 18.4%). On return on invested capital, Illumina (ILMN) leads (Becton Dickinson (BDX) 5.3%, Danaher (DHR) 5.7%, Illumina (ILMN) 15.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Illumina (ILMN) returned the most: Becton Dickinson (BDX) +6.6%, Danaher (DHR) +3.5%, Illumina (ILMN) +169.5%. Over five years, Becton Dickinson (BDX) compounded fastest (Becton Dickinson (BDX) -4.3%/yr, Danaher (DHR) -6.0%/yr, Illumina (ILMN) -7.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Danaher (DHR) has been the steadiest (Becton Dickinson (BDX) 31.8%, Danaher (DHR) 30.6%, Illumina (ILMN) 50.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BDX, DHR and ILMN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Becton Dickinson (BDX) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.