BDL vs EAT vs HDL Stock Comparison

Flanigans Enterprises, Brinker International and Super Hi International Holding Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BDL Flanigans Enterprises Inc
$53.15 +18.6% 1M +67.8% 1Y
Market cap
$106.50M
P/E
16.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$215.29M
Div. yield
–
Full-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
EAT Brinker International, Inc
$220.69 +9.0% 1M +77.6% 1Y
Market cap
$9.28B
P/E
18.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.93B
Div. yield
–
Full-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
7 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Brinker International leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Brinker International 7, Flanigans Enterprises 2, Super Hi International Holding 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBDLEATHDLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $106.50M $9.28B $643.80M EAT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.0x 18.5x 56.7x BDL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 15.9x 18.3x EAT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.1% +6.1% +10.5% HDL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.1% 8.4% 1.2% EAT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.6% 61.3% — EAT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.2x 0.5x — BDL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +67.8% +77.6% -43.2% EAT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.7%/yr +39.4%/yr — EAT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 58.7% 50.9% 39.3% HDL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 68/100 77/100 58/100 EAT

Percentile Scorecard

BDLEATHDL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBDLEATHDL
Valuation 96 #3 of 50 57 #22 of 50 80 #11 of 50
Growth 91 #5 of 47 89 #6 of 47 24 #36 of 47
Profitability 49 #24 of 46 98 #2 of 46 56 #21 of 46
Financial Health 80 #11 of 51 46 #28 of 51 74 #14 of 51
Shareholder Returns 23 #25 of 32 94 #3 of 32 –
Overall 68 77 58
  • BDL ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants
  • EAT ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants
  • HDL ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBDLEATHDLSPY
1 month +18.6%+9.0%-12.8% +0.9%
3 months +43.3%+7.2%-25.3% +5.9%
6 months +83.3%+49.3%-25.6% +8.5%
Year to date +79.6%+53.8%-38.4% +13.3%
1 year +67.8%+77.6%-43.2% +12.4%
3 years +88.3%+574.3%— +88.1%
3 years, per year +23.5%+89.0%— +23.5%
5 years +81.7%+426.0%— +68.2%
5 years, per year +12.7%+39.4%— +11.0%
10 years +129.6%+359.5%— +263.4%
10 years, per year +8.7%+16.5%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureBDLEATHDLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 58.7%50.9%39.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 63.5%46.4%50.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.600.790.28 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.161.52-1.10 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -41.2%-50.7%-66.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-13.1%-46.0% -0.9%
52-week high $53.15$254.01$18.32 $779.14
52-week low $27.55$102.29$9.75 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBDLEATHDL
P/E now vs peer median 14.9xmedian 20.8x 18.6xmedian 20.8x 56.7xmedian 20.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 1.1x 1.6xmedian 1.1x 0.7xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.2xmedian 13.0x 11.1xmedian 13.0x -5.4xmedian 13.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 21.4xmedian 17.6x 15.4xmedian 17.6x 5.3xmedian 17.6x
P/B now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 3.2x 23.1xmedian 3.2x —median 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.28median 1.08 0.33median 1.08 —median 1.08

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBDLEATHDL
Revenue $215.29M $5.93B $888.78M
Gross profit $124.08M $4.41B –
Operating income $11.46M $653.00M –
Net income $10.35M $500.80M $10.19M
Free cash flow $4.62M $601.00M $120.84M
EPS (diluted) $3.57 $11.65 –
Cash & equivalents $28.84M $30.70M $266.40M
Total debt $92.23M $484.80M –
Shares (diluted) 1.86M 43.00M –
Enterprise value $11.77M $9.07B -$349.48M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBDLEATHDL
P/E 14.9x 18.6x 56.7x
P/FCF 21.4x 15.4x 5.3x
P/Operating cash flow 6.1x 11.0x 5.3x
P/S 0.5x 1.6x 0.7x
P/B 1.2x 23.1x –
P/Tangible book 1.2x 24.1x –
EV/EBITDA 6.2x 11.1x -5.4x
EV/EBIT 8.8x 14.9x 25.9x
EV/Revenue 0.5x 1.6x 0.4x
EV/FCF 21.9x 16.1x 3.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 6.3x 11.6x 3.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.28 0.33 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBDLEATHDL
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.1% 6.1% 10.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.0% 12.3% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 8.3% 5.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 12.8% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 50.1% 13.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 9.1% 51.3% –
Net income growth (1Y) 51.1% 12.8% -81.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.5% 52.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) 53.6% 20.1% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 52.3% 55.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 89.1% 13.7% 2.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.8% 42.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 75.9% 28.0% 2.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 45.7% 78.5% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBDLEATHDL
Gross margin 57.6% 74.4% –
EBITDA margin 7.6% 14.7% -7.9%
Operating margin 5.3% 11.0% –
Pretax margin 5.2% 10.1% 3.0%
Net margin 3.1% 8.4% 1.2%
FCF margin 2.1% 10.1% 13.6%
Operating cash flow margin 7.5% 14.1% 13.6%
Return on equity 12.4% 118.7% –
Return on assets 6.8% 17.9% –
Return on invested capital 9.6% 61.3% –
Return on capital employed 8.7% 30.3% –
Asset turnover 1.4x 2.1x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 1.7x 11.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBDLEATHDL
Debt / assets 20.0% 17.5% –
Debt / equity 0.4x 1.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.2x 0.5x –
Debt / FCF 6.8x 0.8x –
Liabilities / assets 46.5% 85.6% –
Equity / assets 53.5% 14.4% –
Interest coverage 10.3x 12.0x 1.2x
Current ratio 2.0x 0.3x –
Quick ratio 1.5x 0.2x 2.2x
Cash ratio 1.5x 0.0x 2.0x
Altman Z-score 3.19 5.46 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBDLEATHDL
Dividend yield 1.1% – –
Net buyback yield – 5.1% –
Shareholder yield 1.1% 5.1% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBDLEATHDL
Forward P/E – 15.9xFY2027 18.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $13.84FY2027 $0.54FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +28.9%FY2027 -10.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -0.8% +44.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $5.99BFY2027 $891.81MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +3.1%FY2027 +6.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +12.2% +13.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBDLEATHDL
Held by institutions 10.4% 100.0% –
Institutions holding 12 507 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% -1.4% –
Institutions buying 4 279 –
Institutions selling 3 160 –
Buyers to sellers 1.33 1.74 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BDLEATHDL
BDL 1.00 -0.03 0.04
EAT -0.03 1.00 -0.04
HDL 0.04 -0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BDL, EAT and HDL?

Brinker International (EAT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Flanigans Enterprises (BDL) $106.50M, Brinker International (EAT) $9.28B, Super Hi International Holding (HDL) $643.80M.

Which stock is cheaper, BDL, EAT and HDL?

Flanigans Enterprises (BDL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Flanigans Enterprises (BDL) 16.0x, Brinker International (EAT) 18.5x, Super Hi International Holding (HDL) 56.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Brinker International (EAT) is cheapest (Brinker International (EAT) 15.9x, Super Hi International Holding (HDL) 18.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Super Hi International Holding (HDL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Flanigans Enterprises (BDL) +7.1%, Brinker International (EAT) +6.1%, Super Hi International Holding (HDL) +10.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Brinker International (EAT) has the highest net margin (Flanigans Enterprises (BDL) 3.1%, Brinker International (EAT) 8.4%, Super Hi International Holding (HDL) 1.2%). On return on invested capital, Brinker International (EAT) leads (Flanigans Enterprises (BDL) 9.6%, Brinker International (EAT) 61.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Brinker International (EAT) returned the most: Flanigans Enterprises (BDL) +67.8%, Brinker International (EAT) +77.6%, Super Hi International Holding (HDL) -43.2%. Over five years, Brinker International (EAT) compounded fastest (Flanigans Enterprises (BDL) +12.7%/yr, Brinker International (EAT) +39.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Super Hi International Holding (HDL) has been the steadiest (Flanigans Enterprises (BDL) 58.7%, Brinker International (EAT) 50.9%, Super Hi International Holding (HDL) 39.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BDL, EAT and HDL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Brinker International (EAT) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.