BCO vs JLHL vs SNT Stock Comparison

Brinks, Julong Holding and Senstar Technologies Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BCO Brinks Co
$107.18 +0.3% 1M -7.4% 1Y
Market cap
$4.42B
P/E
24.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.48B
Div. yield
0.96%
Security Services Industrials
8 wins
JLHL Julong Holding Ltd
$5.54 -4.2% 1M +34.8% 1Y
Market cap
$118.83M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Engineering and Construction Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Brinks leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Brinks 8, Julong Holding 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBCOJLHLSNTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.42B $118.83M $36.40M BCO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 24.5x — 74.0x BCO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.4x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.1% — -3.2% BCO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.3% — 1.3% BCO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.9% — 0.7% BCO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.3x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.96% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -7.4% +34.8% -67.9% JLHL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +9.4%/yr — -16.9%/yr BCO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 34.2% 261.9% 59.0% BCO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 — 50/100 BCO

Percentile Scorecard

BCOJLHLSNT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBCOJLHLSNT
Valuation 63 #42 of 112 – 72 #32 of 112
Growth 63 #36 of 96 – 3 #93 of 96
Profitability 67 #31 of 91 – 36 #59 of 91
Financial Health 24 #95 of 125 52 #28 of 57 89 #15 of 125
Shareholder Returns 41 #40 of 67 – –
Overall 52 – 50
  • BCO ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • JLHL ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • SNT ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBCOJLHLSNTSPY
1 month +0.3%-4.2%-3.1% -0.2%
3 months -9.3%-6.4%-10.9% +3.9%
6 months -1.4%-48.4%-44.5% +8.2%
Year to date -8.2%+37.5%-67.7% +12.9%
1 year -7.4%+34.8%-67.9% +12.3%
3 years +63.1%—+36.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year +17.7%—+11.0% +23.3%
5 years +56.3%—-60.3% +67.9%
5 years, per year +9.4%—-16.9% +10.9%
10 years +163.7%—-65.2% +261.1%
10 years, per year +10.2%—-10.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBCOJLHLSNTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 34.2%261.9%59.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.8%229.6%60.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.740.750.89 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.220.13-1.15 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.5%-93.2%-74.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -20.9%-87.6%-68.2% -1.2%
52-week high $135.58$44.80$4.91 $779.14
52-week low $92.16$3.05$1.34 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBCOJLHLSNT
P/E now vs peer median 24.5xmedian 21.2x —median 26.7x 74.0xmedian 21.2x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 0.9x —median 0.8x 1.0xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.2xmedian 11.9x —median 13.1x —median 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.2xmedian 13.7x —median 23.0x —median 13.7x
P/B now vs peer median 10.0xmedian 2.4x 10.2xmedian 2.4x 0.9xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 1.08median 1.00 —median 0.57 —median 1.00

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBCOJLHLSNT
Revenue $5.48B – $36.80M
Gross profit $1.45B – $23.34M
Operating income $576.00M – $729.00K
Net income $191.00M – $378.00K
Free cash flow $393.60M – –
R&D – – $3.98M
EPS (diluted) $4.36 – $0.02
Cash & equivalents $1.66B $6.27M $7.88M
Total debt $4.59B – $1.14M
Shares (diluted) 41.50M 20.39M 23.46M
Enterprise value -$1.72B $97.94M -$26.32M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBCOJLHLSNT
P/E 24.5x – 74.0x
P/FCF 11.2x – –
P/Operating cash flow 7.9x – –
P/S 0.8x – 1.0x
P/B 10.0x 10.2x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 49.7x 10.2x 0.9x
EV/EBITDA 8.2x – –
EV/EBIT 12.8x – 39.5x
EV/Revenue 1.3x – 0.8x
EV/FCF 18.7x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 13.1x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.08 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBCOJLHLSNT
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.1% – -3.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.0% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 13.6% – -7.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.3% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 22.8% – -86.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 14.1% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 9.8% – -92.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 15.8% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 13.6% – -90.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 22.8% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -1.9% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.0% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 13.2% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 3.5% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBCOJLHLSNT
Gross margin 26.4% – 63.4%
EBITDA margin 16.3% – –
Operating margin 10.5% – 2.0%
Pretax margin 5.9% – 2.4%
Net margin 3.3% – 1.3%
FCF margin 7.2% – –
Operating cash flow margin 10.2% – –
Return on equity 45.7% – 0.9%
Return on assets 2.6% – 0.7%
Return on invested capital 6.9% – 0.7%
Return on capital employed 11.0% – 1.6%
Asset turnover 0.8x – 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.9x – –
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBCOJLHLSNT
Debt / assets 62.6% 2.5% 0.8%
Debt / equity 10.4x 0.1x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.3x – –
Debt / FCF 11.7x – –
Liabilities / assets 94.0% 79.9% 20.6%
Equity / assets 6.0% 20.1% 79.4%
Interest coverage 2.3x – –
Current ratio 1.6x 1.2x 3.6x
Quick ratio 1.2x 1.1x 2.2x
Cash ratio 0.8x 0.1x 1.0x
Altman Z-score 1.66 – 3.12

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBCOJLHLSNT
Dividend yield 1.0% – –
Net buyback yield 2.5% – –
Shareholder yield 3.4% – 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 22.1% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 10.7% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) -0.2% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 3.4% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBCOJLHLSNT
Forward P/E 13.4xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $8.02FY2026 – –
EPS growth, next FY -0.4%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +24.7% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.22BFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY -0.8%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after +4.2% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBCOJLHLSNT
Held by institutions 100.0% – –
Institutions holding 359 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +12.1% – –
Institutions buying 182 – –
Institutions selling 122 – –
Buyers to sellers 1.49 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BCOJLHLSNT
BCO 1.00 -0.13 -0.05
JLHL -0.13 1.00 0.02
SNT -0.05 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BCO, JLHL and SNT?

Brinks (BCO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brinks (BCO) $4.42B, Julong Holding (JLHL) $118.83M, Senstar Technologies (SNT) $36.40M.

Which stock is cheaper, BCO, JLHL and SNT?

Brinks (BCO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Brinks (BCO) 24.5x, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 74.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Brinks (BCO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Brinks (BCO) +8.1%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -3.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Brinks (BCO) has the highest net margin (Brinks (BCO) 3.3%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 1.3%). On return on invested capital, Brinks (BCO) leads (Brinks (BCO) 6.9%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 0.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Julong Holding (JLHL) returned the most: Brinks (BCO) -7.4%, Julong Holding (JLHL) +34.8%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -67.9%. Over five years, Brinks (BCO) compounded fastest (Brinks (BCO) +9.4%/yr, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -16.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Brinks (BCO) 0.96%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 0.00%. Julong Holding (JLHL) and Senstar Technologies (SNT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Brinks (BCO) has been the steadiest (Brinks (BCO) 34.2%, Julong Holding (JLHL) 261.9%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 59.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BCO, JLHL and SNT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Brinks (BCO) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.