BCO vs CTAS vs RSKIA Stock Comparison

Brinks, Cintas and George Risk Industries Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BCO Brinks Co
$110.86 +3.8% 1M -3.9% 1Y
Market cap
$4.44B
P/E
24.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.48B
Div. yield
0.01%
Security Services Industrials
2 wins
CTAS Cintas Corp
$225.93 +13.0% 1M +18.4% 1Y
Market cap
$85.91B
P/E
41.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.56B
Div. yield
0.01%
Facility Services Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Cintas leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Cintas 5, George Risk Industries 5, Brinks 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBCOCTASRSKIALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.44B $85.91B $102.61M CTAS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 24.5x 41.7x 10.5x RSKIA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.8x 38.6x — BCO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.1% +9.5% +13.9% RSKIA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.3% 17.8% 37.9% RSKIA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.9% 28.2% — CTAS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.3x 0.7x — CTAS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.01% 0.00% BCO
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -3.9% +18.4% +23.5% RSKIA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +11.0%/yr +16.4%/yr +9.7%/yr CTAS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 34.1% 23.3% 25.5% CTAS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 59/100 87/100 RSKIA

Percentile Scorecard

BCOCTASRSKIA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBCOCTASRSKIA
Valuation 64 #41 of 112 19 #91 of 112 78 #26 of 112
Growth 63 #36 of 96 71 #29 of 96 87 #13 of 96
Profitability 67 #31 of 91 98 #3 of 91 86 #14 of 91
Financial Health 24 #95 of 125 70 #38 of 125 99 #2 of 125
Shareholder Returns 41 #40 of 67 39 #41 of 67 86 #10 of 67
Overall 52 59 87
  • BCO ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • CTAS ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • RSKIA ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBCOCTASRSKIASPY
1 month +3.8%+13.0%-6.2% -0.8%
3 months -6.0%+7.1%+10.6% +3.5%
6 months +3.8%+29.8%+13.6% +7.0%
Year to date -5.0%+20.1%+21.7% +12.2%
1 year -3.9%+18.4%+23.5% +13.0%
3 years +68.7%+82.1%+78.7% +86.3%
3 years, per year +19.1%+22.1%+21.4% +23.1%
5 years +68.5%+113.7%+59.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year +11.0%+16.4%+9.7% +11.0%
10 years +182.5%+747.7%+190.1% +258.0%
10 years, per year +10.9%+23.8%+11.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBCOCTASRSKIASPY
Volatility, 1Y 34.1%23.3%25.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.6%23.3%32.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.750.130.02 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.110.790.92 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.5%-28.2%-39.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -18.2%0.0%-7.7% -1.8%
52-week high $135.58$225.93$22.75 $779.14
52-week low $92.16$163.55$16.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBCOCTASRSKIA
P/E now vs peer median 25.4xmedian 21.9x 43.9xmedian 21.9x 10.5xmedian 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 0.9x 7.8xmedian 0.9x 4.0xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.4xmedian 12.2x 28.8xmedian 12.2x 7.0xmedian 12.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.6xmedian 14.3x 44.4xmedian 14.3x 24.3xmedian 14.3x
P/B now vs peer median 10.3xmedian 2.3x 17.3xmedian 2.3x 1.6xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 1.11median 1.02 2.89median 1.02 0.60median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBCOCTASRSKIA
Revenue $5.48B $11.56B $25.81M
Gross profit $1.45B $5.89B $12.15M
Operating income $576.00M $2.70B $7.06M
Net income $191.00M $2.06B $9.79M
Free cash flow $393.60M $2.03B $4.22M
EPS (diluted) $4.36 $5.10 $1.99
Cash & equivalents $1.66B $243.60M $6.84M
Total debt $4.59B $2.43B –
Shares (diluted) 41.50M 404.29M 4.91M
Enterprise value -$1.83B $84.99B -$85.67M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBCOCTASRSKIA
P/E 25.4x 43.9x 10.5x
P/FCF 11.6x 44.4x 24.3x
P/Operating cash flow 8.1x 37.1x 22.9x
P/S 0.8x 7.8x 4.0x
P/B 10.3x 17.3x 1.6x
P/Tangible book 51.4x 18.3x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 8.4x 28.8x 7.0x
EV/EBIT 13.0x 34.2x 7.4x
EV/Revenue 1.4x 8.0x 2.0x
EV/FCF 19.1x 45.5x 12.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.4x 38.0x 11.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.11 2.89 0.60

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBCOCTASRSKIA
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.1% 9.5% 13.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.0% 8.7% 9.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 13.6% 11.5% 10.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.3% 11.2% 10.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 22.8% 11.8% 12.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 14.1% 13.2% 13.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 9.8% 11.3% 19.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 15.8% 14.3% 17.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 13.6% 12.7% 19.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 22.8% 15.2% 17.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -1.9% 14.8% 7.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.0% 14.4% 29.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 13.2% 19.5% 13.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 3.5% 17.4% 45.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBCOCTASRSKIA
Gross margin 26.4% 51.0% 47.1%
EBITDA margin 16.3% 27.8% 29.0%
Operating margin 10.5% 23.4% 27.4%
Pretax margin 5.9% 22.5% 50.9%
Net margin 3.3% 17.8% 37.9%
FCF margin 7.2% 17.6% 16.4%
Operating cash flow margin 10.2% 21.1% 17.3%
Return on equity 45.7% 39.8% 15.2%
Return on assets 2.6% 19.5% 13.4%
Return on invested capital 6.9% 28.2% –
Return on capital employed 11.0% 34.2% 10.4%
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.1x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.9x 1.2x 0.5x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 1.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBCOCTASRSKIA
Debt / assets 62.6% 22.8% –
Debt / equity 10.4x 0.5x –
Net debt / EBITDA 3.3x 0.7x –
Debt / FCF 11.7x 1.2x –
Liabilities / assets 94.0% 51.1% 11.9%
Equity / assets 6.0% 48.9% 88.1%
Interest coverage 2.3x 25.3x –
Current ratio 1.6x 1.5x 14.6x
Quick ratio 1.2x 0.7x 11.2x
Cash ratio 0.8x 0.1x 10.3x
Altman Z-score 1.67 13.76 10.02

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBCOCTASRSKIA
Dividend yield 0.9% 0.8% 6.0%
Net buyback yield 2.4% 1.1% –
Shareholder yield 3.3% 1.9% 6.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 22.1% 35.2% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 10.7% 35.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) -0.2% 14.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 3.4% 15.5% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBCOCTASRSKIA
Forward P/E 13.8xFY2026 38.6xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $8.02FY2026 $5.85FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY -0.4%FY2026 +18.4%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +24.7% +10.4% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.22BFY2026 $12.98BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY -0.8%FY2026 +15.3%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +4.2% +6.8% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBCOCTASRSKIA
Held by institutions 100.0% 67.6% –
Institutions holding 359 1,428 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +12.1% +6.4% –
Institutions buying 182 656 –
Institutions selling 122 575 –
Buyers to sellers 1.49 1.14 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BCOCTASRSKIA
BCO 1.00 0.35 0.07
CTAS 0.35 1.00 0.11
RSKIA 0.07 0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BCO, CTAS and RSKIA?

Cintas (CTAS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brinks (BCO) $4.44B, Cintas (CTAS) $85.91B, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) $102.61M.

Which stock is cheaper, BCO, CTAS and RSKIA?

George Risk Industries (RSKIA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Brinks (BCO) 24.5x, Cintas (CTAS) 41.7x, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) 10.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Brinks (BCO) is cheapest (Brinks (BCO) 13.8x, Cintas (CTAS) 38.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

George Risk Industries (RSKIA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Brinks (BCO) +8.1%, Cintas (CTAS) +9.5%, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) +13.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

George Risk Industries (RSKIA) has the highest net margin (Brinks (BCO) 3.3%, Cintas (CTAS) 17.8%, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) 37.9%). On return on invested capital, Cintas (CTAS) leads (Brinks (BCO) 6.9%, Cintas (CTAS) 28.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year George Risk Industries (RSKIA) returned the most: Brinks (BCO) -3.9%, Cintas (CTAS) +18.4%, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) +23.5%. Over five years, Cintas (CTAS) compounded fastest (Brinks (BCO) +11.0%/yr, Cintas (CTAS) +16.4%/yr, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) +9.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Brinks (BCO) has the highest dividend yield: Brinks (BCO) 0.01%, Cintas (CTAS) 0.01%, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) 0.00%. George Risk Industries (RSKIA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cintas (CTAS) has been the steadiest (Brinks (BCO) 34.1%, Cintas (CTAS) 23.3%, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) 25.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BCO, CTAS and RSKIA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cintas (CTAS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.