BCC vs WY vs FERG Stock Comparison

Boise Cascade, Weyerhaeuser and Ferguson Enterprises Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BCC BOISE CASCADE Co
$77.76 0.0% 1M +8.0% 1Y
Market cap
$2.65B
P/E
25.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.46B
Div. yield
0.01%
Industrial Distribution Industrials
3 wins
WY Weyerhaeuser Co
$19.49 -7.9% 1M -18.3% 1Y
Market cap
$14.12B
P/E
29.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.85B
Div. yield
0.04%
Lumber Basic Materials
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Ferguson Enterprises leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Ferguson Enterprises 6, Boise Cascade 3, Weyerhaeuser 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBCCWYFERGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.65B $14.12B $44.66B FERG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 25.1x 29.9x 22.0x FERG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.5x 69.6x 21.2x BCC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -1.5% -2.6% +5.2% FERG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.6% 6.9% 6.5% WY
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.6% 5.7% 21.7% FERG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.4x 3.6x 1.0x BCC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.04% 0.00% WY
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +8.0% -18.3% -7.4% BCC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.9%/yr -12.1%/yr +8.7%/yr FERG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 37.9% 27.5% 29.9% WY
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 44/100 67/100 FERG

Percentile Scorecard

BCCWYFERG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBCCWYFERG
Valuation 87 #7 of 46 51 #142 of 287 49 #24 of 46
Growth 8 #36 of 39 26 #198 of 267 76 #10 of 39
Profitability 49 #21 of 40 50 #121 of 240 87 #6 of 40
Financial Health 75 #13 of 49 39 #180 of 295 48 #26 of 49
Shareholder Returns 42 #19 of 32 54 #94 of 204 74 #9 of 32
Overall 52 44 67
  • BCC ranked among 49 companies in Distribution and Rental
  • WY ranked among 308 companies in Basic Materials
  • FERG ranked among 49 companies in Distribution and Rental

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBCCWYFERGSPY
1 month 0.0%-7.9%+2.6% -1.0%
3 months -0.2%-18.6%-1.6% +2.9%
6 months -7.6%-22.1%-13.9% +6.4%
Year to date +5.7%-17.7%+1.9% +11.4%
1 year +8.0%-18.3%-7.4% +13.1%
3 years -15.2%-32.7%+48.4% +79.4%
3 years, per year -5.3%-12.4%+14.1% +21.5%
5 years +33.3%-47.5%+51.8% +67.7%
5 years, per year +5.9%-12.1%+8.7% +10.9%
10 years +231.2%-37.7%+308.8% +255.2%
10 years, per year +12.7%-4.6%+15.1% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureBCCWYFERGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 37.9%27.5%29.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.9%25.5%30.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.930.231.13 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.21-0.67-0.25 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -57.3%-56.6%-43.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.6%-28.1%-15.2% -2.5%
52-week high $91.03$27.10$267.71 $779.14
52-week low $65.47$18.48$214.24 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBCCWYFERG
P/E now vs peer median 25.9xmedian 25.9x 29.8xmedian 17.9x 21.8xmedian 25.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 1.0x 2.0xmedian 1.8x 1.4xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.7xmedian 13.0x 14.0xmedian 9.8x 14.8xmedian 13.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 26.3xmedian 23.0x -31.4xmedian 16.0x 19.5xmedian 23.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 2.4x 1.5xmedian 1.8x 7.5xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median -0.63median 2.37 -2.49median 0.73 —median 2.37

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBCCWYFERG
Revenue $6.46B $6.85B $31.35B
Gross profit $1.07B $994.00M $9.73B
Operating income $160.04M $844.00M $2.82B
Net income $105.69M $472.00M $2.03B
Free cash flow $103.31M -$447.00M $2.26B
R&D – $5.00M –
EPS (diluted) $3.00 $0.65 $10.42
Cash & equivalents $304.82M $527.00M $820.00M
Total debt $1.79B $5.43B $4.13B
Shares (diluted) 35.23M 721.90M 194.80M
Enterprise value $1.02B $12.43B $41.88B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBCCWYFERG
P/E 25.9x 29.8x 21.8x
P/FCF 26.3x -31.4x 19.5x
P/Operating cash flow 9.8x 25.7x 16.8x
P/S 0.4x 2.0x 1.4x
P/B 1.3x 1.5x 7.5x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 1.5x 8.4x
EV/EBITDA 8.7x 14.0x 14.8x
EV/EBIT 17.9x 22.4x 16.8x
EV/Revenue 0.4x 2.8x 1.5x
EV/FCF 27.7x -42.4x 20.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.4x 34.6x 18.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.63 -2.49 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBCCWYFERG
Revenue growth (1Y) -1.5% -2.6% 5.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -3.3% -4.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -10.7% -18.1% 7.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -11.5% -18.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -53.6% 46.5% 17.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -40.8% -12.1% –
Net income growth (1Y) -59.7% 69.2% 31.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -43.3% -12.4% –
EPS growth (1Y) -56.8% 69.7% 34.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -40.9% -12.0% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 0.7% -40.4% 35.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -32.5% -26.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 844.4% -263.1% 42.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -48.4% -36.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBCCWYFERG
Gross margin 16.5% 14.5% 31.0%
EBITDA margin 5.1% 19.8% 10.2%
Operating margin 2.5% 12.3% 9.0%
Pretax margin 2.3% 5.5% 8.3%
Net margin 1.6% 6.9% 6.5%
FCF margin 1.6% -6.5% 7.2%
Operating cash flow margin 4.3% 8.0% 8.3%
Return on equity 5.2% 5.0% 34.0%
Return on assets 3.1% 2.9% 11.4%
Return on invested capital 4.6% 5.7% 21.7%
Return on capital employed 5.9% 5.4% 23.4%
Asset turnover 1.9x 0.4x 1.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.6x 1.2x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 0.6% 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBCCWYFERG
Debt / assets 13.2% 32.9% 23.2%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.6x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.4x 3.6x 1.0x
Debt / FCF 4.3x -12.1x 1.8x
Liabilities / assets 40.2% 42.7% 67.0%
Equity / assets 59.8% 57.3% 33.0%
Interest coverage 6.5x 3.1x –
Current ratio 2.7x 1.8x 1.8x
Quick ratio 1.3x 1.0x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.6x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 4.26 1.95 5.39

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBCCWYFERG
Dividend yield 1.1% 4.3% 1.6%
Net buyback yield 7.6% 0.4% 1.9%
Shareholder yield 8.7% 4.7% 3.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) 32.5% 128.2% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 33.2% -135.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) -85.0% 1.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -42.8% -20.5% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBCCWYFERG
Forward P/E 20.5xFY2026 69.6xFY2026 21.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.80FY2026 $0.28FY2026 $10.70FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +7.6%FY2026 +40.0%FY2026 +7.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +32.1% +107.1% +20.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.80BFY2026 $7.59BFY2026 $34.27BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.3%FY2026 +9.9%FY2026 +11.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.2% -2.0% -0.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBCCWYFERG
Held by institutions 96.0% 90.2% 96.3%
Institutions holding 333 903 937
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.4% +2.1% +2.1%
Institutions buying 164 432 477
Institutions selling 128 318 343
Buyers to sellers 1.28 1.36 1.39

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BCCWYFERG
BCC 1.00 0.62 0.58
WY 0.62 1.00 0.40
FERG 0.58 0.40 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BCC, WY and FERG?

Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Boise Cascade (BCC) $2.65B, Weyerhaeuser (WY) $14.12B, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) $44.66B.

Which stock is cheaper, BCC, WY and FERG?

Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Boise Cascade (BCC) 25.1x, Weyerhaeuser (WY) 29.9x, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) 22.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Boise Cascade (BCC) is cheapest (Boise Cascade (BCC) 20.5x, Weyerhaeuser (WY) 69.6x, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) 21.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Boise Cascade (BCC) -1.5%, Weyerhaeuser (WY) -2.6%, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) +5.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Weyerhaeuser (WY) has the highest net margin (Boise Cascade (BCC) 1.6%, Weyerhaeuser (WY) 6.9%, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) 6.5%). On return on invested capital, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) leads (Boise Cascade (BCC) 4.6%, Weyerhaeuser (WY) 5.7%, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) 21.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Boise Cascade (BCC) returned the most: Boise Cascade (BCC) +8.0%, Weyerhaeuser (WY) -18.3%, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) -7.4%. Over five years, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) compounded fastest (Boise Cascade (BCC) +5.9%/yr, Weyerhaeuser (WY) -12.1%/yr, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) +8.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Weyerhaeuser (WY) has the highest dividend yield: Boise Cascade (BCC) 0.01%, Weyerhaeuser (WY) 0.04%, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) 0.00%. Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Weyerhaeuser (WY) has been the steadiest (Boise Cascade (BCC) 37.9%, Weyerhaeuser (WY) 27.5%, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) 29.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BCC, WY and FERG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ferguson Enterprises (FERG) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.