BBWI vs CL vs GWLL Stock Comparison

Bath & Body Works, Colgate Palmolive and Goldenwell Biotech Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BBWI Bath & Body Works, Inc.
$21.38 +30.0% 1M -20.8% 1Y
Market cap
$4.75B
P/E
7.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.38B
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
4 wins
CL Colgate Palmolive Co
$93.11 +8.2% 1M +19.4% 1Y
Market cap
$73.71B
P/E
36.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$21.05B
Div. yield
0.02%
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
6 wins
GWLL Goldenwell Biotech, Inc.
$0.65 -5.8% 1M +225.0% 1Y
Market cap
$64.35M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$55.00
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Colgate Palmolive leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Colgate Palmolive 6, Bath & Body Works 4, Goldenwell Biotech 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBBWICLGWLLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.75B $73.71B $64.35M CL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 7.2x 36.2x -222.2x BBWI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.6x 24.8x — BBWI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.1% +5.2% — CL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.0% 9.7% -512,940.0% CL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 32.2% 27.2% — BBWI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.0x 1.7x — CL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -20.8% +19.4% +225.0% GWLL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -20.8%/yr +4.2%/yr — CL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 61.9% 23.3% 285.0% CL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 65/100 61/100 18/100 BBWI

Percentile Scorecard

BBWICLGWLL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBBWICLGWLL
Valuation 90 #6 of 52 47 #28 of 52 18 #43 of 52
Growth 47 #27 of 50 57 #22 of 50 45 #28 of 50
Profitability 93 #4 of 45 96 #3 of 45 0 #45 of 45
Financial Health 31 #39 of 56 51 #28 of 56 11 #50 of 56
Shareholder Returns 63 #12 of 31 53 #15 of 31 –
Overall 65 61 18
  • BBWI ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • CL ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • GWLL ranked among 60 companies in Household and Personal Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBBWICLGWLLSPY
1 month +30.0%+8.2%-5.8% -0.8%
3 months +4.3%+1.3%-27.8% +3.5%
6 months +12.6%+10.6%-35.0% +7.0%
Year to date +6.5%+17.8%-77.6% +12.2%
1 year -20.8%+19.4%+225.0% +13.0%
3 years -24.4%+29.7%+160.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year -8.9%+9.1%+37.5% +23.1%
5 years -68.8%+22.7%— +68.6%
5 years, per year -20.8%+4.2%— +11.0%
10 years -63.7%+30.7%— +258.0%
10 years, per year -9.6%+2.7%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBBWICLGWLLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 61.9%23.3%285.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 64.0%22.2%480.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.41-0.152.01 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.340.830.79 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -81.1%-31.1%-92.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -18.1%-6.1%-90.7% -1.8%
52-week high $26.09$99.14$7.00 $779.14
52-week low $14.85$74.98$0.20 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBBWICLGWLL
P/E now vs peer median 7.0xmedian 18.6x 36.5xmedian 18.6x -222.2xmedian 18.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 1.6x 3.5xmedian 1.6x 1,170,000xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.2xmedian 13.0x 21.4xmedian 13.0x —median 13.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 4.7xmedian 18.4x 19.2xmedian 18.4x -583.1xmedian 18.4x
P/B now vs peer median -4.1xmedian 2.1x 131.1xmedian 2.1x -161.6xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 3.31median 0.97 3.01median 0.97 —median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBBWICLGWLL
Revenue $7.38B $21.05B $55.00
Gross profit $3.23B $12.72B $12.00
Operating income $1.13B $3.13B -$114.80K
Net income $662.00M $2.16B -$282.12K
Free cash flow – $3.86B -$110.37K
EPS (diluted) $3.28 $2.54 $0.00
Cash & equivalents $794.00M $1.37B $11.14K
Total debt $3.61B $7.86B –
Shares (diluted) 202.00M 801.80M 99.00M
Enterprise value $2.40B $68.44B $64.25M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBBWICLGWLL
P/E 7.0x 36.5x -222.2x
P/FCF 4.7x 19.2x -583.1x
P/Operating cash flow – 16.7x -583.1x
P/S 0.6x 3.5x 1,170,000x
P/B -4.1x 131.1x -161.6x
P/Tangible book -3.5x -79.9x -161.6x
EV/EBITDA 5.2x 21.4x –
EV/EBIT 6.3x 25.8x -560.4x
EV/Revenue 1.0x 3.8x 1,169,797x
EV/FCF – 20.9x -583.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – 18.1x -583.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.31 3.01 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBBWICLGWLL
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.1% 5.2% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.3% 4.1% -89.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -1.6% 5.0% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 0.9% 6.2% -92.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -10.2% -26.9% -3.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -2.5% 1.1% 51.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -9.1% -29.2% -136.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -2.1% 8.9% 36.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -5.0% -29.0% -130.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.1% 12.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 13.7% -474.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 12.9% 51.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 14.5% -474.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 17.9% 51.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBBWICLGWLL
Gross margin 43.8% 60.4% 21.8%
EBITDA margin 18.7% 17.9% –
Operating margin 15.4% 14.9% -208,729%
Pretax margin 12.2% 14.0% -220,184%
Net margin 9.0% 9.7% -512,940%
FCF margin – 18.3% -200,664%
Operating cash flow margin – 21.2% -200,664%
Return on equity – 410.8% –
Return on assets 12.9% 12.9% -441.1%
Return on invested capital 32.2% 27.2% –
Return on capital employed 33.3% 29.7% –
Asset turnover 1.4x 1.3x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.1x 0.4x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBBWICLGWLL
Debt / assets 70.1% 46.8% –
Debt / equity -3.4x 13.9x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.0x 1.7x –
Debt / FCF – 2.0x –
Liabilities / assets 120.5% 96.6% 1,474%
Equity / assets -20.5% 3.4% -1,374%
Interest coverage 4.2x 12.3x –
Current ratio 1.2x 1.0x –
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.5x 0.1x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.2x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 2.32 6.88 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBBWICLGWLL
Dividend yield 3.7% 2.3% –
Net buyback yield – 1.5% –
Shareholder yield 3.7% 3.8% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – 84.3% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 47.2% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 1.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 1.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBBWICLGWLL
Forward P/E 7.6xFY2026 24.8xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $2.80FY2026 $3.75FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY -12.8%FY2026 +1.6%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after -5.7% +11.7% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.36BFY2026 $22.42BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +1.0%FY2026 +10.0%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +0.2% +2.1% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBBWICLGWLL
Held by institutions 100.0% 83.8% –
Institutions holding 463 2,015 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.6% 0.0% –
Institutions buying 244 919 –
Institutions selling 171 720 –
Buyers to sellers 1.43 1.28 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BBWICLGWLL
BBWI 1.00 0.16 0.00
CL 0.16 1.00 -0.05
GWLL 0.00 -0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BBWI, CL and GWLL?

Colgate Palmolive (CL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bath & Body Works (BBWI) $4.75B, Colgate Palmolive (CL) $73.71B, Goldenwell Biotech (GWLL) $64.35M.

Which stock is cheaper, BBWI, CL and GWLL?

Bath & Body Works (BBWI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bath & Body Works (BBWI) 7.2x, Colgate Palmolive (CL) 36.2x, Goldenwell Biotech (GWLL) -222.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) is cheapest (Bath & Body Works (BBWI) 7.6x, Colgate Palmolive (CL) 24.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Colgate Palmolive (CL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bath & Body Works (BBWI) +0.1%, Colgate Palmolive (CL) +5.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Colgate Palmolive (CL) has the highest net margin (Bath & Body Works (BBWI) 9.0%, Colgate Palmolive (CL) 9.7%, Goldenwell Biotech (GWLL) -512,940.0%). On return on invested capital, Bath & Body Works (BBWI) leads (Bath & Body Works (BBWI) 32.2%, Colgate Palmolive (CL) 27.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Goldenwell Biotech (GWLL) returned the most: Bath & Body Works (BBWI) -20.8%, Colgate Palmolive (CL) +19.4%, Goldenwell Biotech (GWLL) +225.0%. Over five years, Colgate Palmolive (CL) compounded fastest (Bath & Body Works (BBWI) -20.8%/yr, Colgate Palmolive (CL) +4.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Bath & Body Works (BBWI) 0.00%, Colgate Palmolive (CL) 0.02%. Bath & Body Works (BBWI) and Goldenwell Biotech (GWLL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Colgate Palmolive (CL) has been the steadiest (Bath & Body Works (BBWI) 61.9%, Colgate Palmolive (CL) 23.3%, Goldenwell Biotech (GWLL) 285.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BBWI, CL and GWLL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Colgate Palmolive (CL) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.