BBUC vs FER vs VRDR Stock Comparison

Brookfield Business, Ferrovial and Verde Resources Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BBUC Brookfield Business Corp
$27.85 +9.5% 1M -23.6% 1Y
Market cap
$2.42B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$26.95B
Div. yield
0.04%
Engineering and Construction Industrials
3 wins
FER Ferrovial N.V.
$54.02 -3.2% 1M -16.7% 1Y
Market cap
$39.19B
P/E
38.7x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Engineering and Construction Industrials
4 wins
VRDR Verde Resources, Inc.
$0.03 0.0% 1M -66.7% 1Y
Market cap
$38.27M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$467.79K
Div. yield
–
Engineering and Construction Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Ferrovial leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Ferrovial 4, Brookfield Business 3, Verde Resources 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBBUCFERVRDRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.42B $39.19B $38.27M FER
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -29.9x 38.7x -11.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 3.1x 50.5x — BBUC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -10.5% — +251.2% VRDR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -0.3% — -723.0% BBUC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 5.4x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.04% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -23.6% -16.7% -66.7% FER
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +12.9%/yr -5.6%/yr FER
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.3% 26.3% 196.3% FER
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 47/100 35/100 BBUC

Percentile Scorecard

BBUCFERVRDR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBBUCFERVRDR
Valuation 98 #2 of 52 35 #34 of 52 14 #45 of 52
Growth 22 #29 of 37 – 44 #21 of 37
Profitability 78 #9 of 37 – 8 #34 of 37
Financial Health 18 #47 of 57 34 #38 of 57 98 #2 of 57
Shareholder Returns 85 #5 of 27 73 #8 of 27 12 #24 of 27
Overall 60 47 35
  • BBUC ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • FER ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • VRDR ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBBUCFERVRDRSPY
1 month +9.5%-3.2%0.0% -0.2%
3 months -12.3%-12.5%-50.0% +3.9%
6 months -16.7%-20.4%-57.1% +8.2%
Year to date -22.4%-16.4%-40.0% +12.9%
1 year -23.6%-16.7%-66.7% +12.3%
3 years +96.7%+66.2%-66.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year +25.3%+18.5%-30.7% +23.3%
5 years —+83.7%-25.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year —+12.9%-5.6% +10.9%
10 years —+155.1%-40.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+9.8%-5.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBBUCFERVRDRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.3%26.3%196.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 39.7%24.6%345.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.981.041.94 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.65-0.63-0.34 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -61.5%-34.3%-96.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.0%-27.4%-70.0% -1.2%
52-week high $37.64$74.38$0.10 $779.14
52-week low $25.06$48.86$0.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBBUCFERVRDR
P/E now vs peer median -29.7xmedian 26.7x 38.7xmedian 26.7x -11.4xmedian 26.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 0.8x 3.6xmedian 0.8x 83.6xmedian 0.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.8xmedian 13.1x —median 13.1x -10.4xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 23.0x 19.8xmedian 23.0x -13.2xmedian 23.0x
P/B now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 2.4x 5.6xmedian 2.4x 1.1xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.57 —median 0.57 -0.91median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBBUCFERVRDR
Revenue $26.95B – $467.79K
Gross profit $5.31B – $168.66K
Operating income $4.15B – -$3.80M
Net income $305.00M – -$3.38M
Free cash flow $2.70B – -$2.95M
R&D – – $484.59K
EPS (diluted) – – $0.00
Cash & equivalents $3.45B $5.02B $1.79M
Total debt $43.93B $12.25B –
Shares (diluted) – 718.72M 1.29B
Enterprise value -$17.80B $17.44B $31.15M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBBUCFERVRDR
P/E -29.7x 38.7x -11.4x
P/FCF 0.9x 19.8x -13.2x
P/Operating cash flow 0.9x – -13.2x
P/S 0.1x 3.6x 83.6x
P/B 0.2x 5.6x 1.1x
P/Tangible book -1.0x 5.7x 11.2x
EV/EBITDA 5.8x – -10.4x
EV/EBIT 10.0x – -9.8x
EV/Revenue 1.5x – 79.8x
EV/FCF 15.4x – -12.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.4x – -12.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – -0.91

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBBUCFERVRDR
Revenue growth (1Y) -10.5% – 251.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -13.2% – 55.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -13.8% – 107.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 5.2% – 51.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) -15.9% – 36.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 9.9% – -3.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -70.0% – 29.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -3.3% – -38.0%
EPS growth (1Y) – – 32.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 12.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -34.9% – 13.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 54.1% – -21.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -34.9% – 13.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 51.7% – -11.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBBUCFERVRDR
Gross margin 19.7% – 36.1%
EBITDA margin 26.8% – -770.6%
Operating margin 15.4% – -812.2%
Pretax margin 1.4% – -723.0%
Net margin -0.3% – -723.0%
FCF margin 10.0% – -631.3%
Operating cash flow margin 10.0% – -631.3%
Return on equity – – -9.0%
Return on assets 0.4% – -8.8%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed 6.4% – -10.1%
Asset turnover 0.3x – 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 8.9x – 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue – – 49.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBBUCFERVRDR
Debt / assets 55.7% 38.0% –
Debt / equity 2.8x 1.8x –
Net debt / EBITDA 5.4x – –
Debt / FCF 16.2x – –
Liabilities / assets 80.4% 78.5% 2.5%
Equity / assets 19.6% 21.5% 97.5%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.4x 1.1x 2.6x
Quick ratio 0.9x 1.1x 2.0x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.7x 2.0x
Altman Z-score – – 23.86

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBBUCFERVRDR
Dividend yield 2.9% 1.4% –
Net buyback yield – – -11.4%
Shareholder yield 2.9% 1.4% -11.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) 31.1% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 3.5% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -2.3% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBBUCFERVRDR
Forward P/E 3.1xFY2026 50.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $8.99FY2026 $1.07FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +54.5%FY2026 -20.7%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +9.0% +12.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.12BFY2026 $11.77BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY -51.8%FY2026 +4.1%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after -100.0% -5.3% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBBUCFERVRDR
Held by institutions 55.0% 33.2% –
Institutions holding 149 337 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +13.6% +17.5% –
Institutions buying 93 208 –
Institutions selling 33 103 –
Buyers to sellers 2.82 2.02 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BBUCFERVRDR
BBUC 1.00 0.29 0.01
FER 0.29 1.00 0.08
VRDR 0.01 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BBUC, FER and VRDR?

Ferrovial (FER) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brookfield Business (BBUC) $2.42B, Ferrovial (FER) $39.19B, Verde Resources (VRDR) $38.27M.

Which company is growing faster?

Verde Resources (VRDR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Brookfield Business (BBUC) -10.5%, Verde Resources (VRDR) +251.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Brookfield Business (BBUC) has the highest net margin (Brookfield Business (BBUC) -0.3%, Verde Resources (VRDR) -723.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ferrovial (FER) returned the most: Brookfield Business (BBUC) -23.6%, Ferrovial (FER) -16.7%, Verde Resources (VRDR) -66.7%. Over five years, Ferrovial (FER) compounded fastest (Ferrovial (FER) +12.9%/yr, Verde Resources (VRDR) -5.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Brookfield Business (BBUC) 0.04%, Ferrovial (FER) 0.00%, Verde Resources (VRDR) 0.00%. Ferrovial (FER) and Verde Resources (VRDR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ferrovial (FER) has been the steadiest (Brookfield Business (BBUC) 36.3%, Ferrovial (FER) 26.3%, Verde Resources (VRDR) 196.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BBUC, FER and VRDR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ferrovial (FER) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.