BBCP vs FER vs GVA Stock Comparison

Concrete Pumping Holdings, Ferrovial and Granite Construction Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ROAD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FER Ferrovial N.V.
$56.92 +4.3% 1M -9.7% 1Y
Market cap
$41.02B
P/E
40.8x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
1.30%
Engineering and Construction Industrials
4 wins
GVA Granite Construction Inc
$121.79 +4.7% 1M +18.1% 1Y
Market cap
$5.37B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$5.30B
Div. yield
0.43%
Engineering and Construction Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Ferrovial leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Ferrovial 4, Concrete Pumping Holdings 4, Granite Construction 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBBCPFERGVALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $513.01M $41.02B $5.37B FER
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 34.8x 40.8x -20.3x BBCP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 53.6x 53.2x — FER
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.2% — +25.1% GVA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.4% — -5.0% BBCP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.6% — 16.1% GVA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.1x — 1.2x GVA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.28% 1.30% 0.43% FER
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +59.6% -9.7% +18.1% BBCP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.4%/yr +12.8%/yr +26.8%/yr GVA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 47.0% 26.6% 34.3% FER
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 44/100 56/100 BBCP

Percentile Scorecard

BBCPFERGVA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBBCPFERGVA
Valuation 90 #6 of 52 35 #34 of 52 84 #9 of 52
Growth 28 #27 of 37 – 53 #18 of 37
Profitability 75 #10 of 37 – 50 #19 of 37
Financial Health 36 #37 of 57 34 #38 of 57 39 #35 of 57
Shareholder Returns 73 #8 of 27 62 #11 of 27 54 #13 of 27
Overall 60 44 56
  • BBCP ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • FER ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • GVA ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBBCPFERGVASPY
1 month +4.9%+4.3%+4.7% +0.7%
3 months +3.5%-12.6%+5.7% +3.7%
6 months +28.5%-17.4%-11.1% +7.1%
Year to date +51.7%-11.9%+5.6% +12.8%
1 year +59.6%-9.7%+18.1% +11.9%
3 years +46.7%+75.1%+255.0% +85.2%
3 years, per year +13.6%+20.6%+52.6% +22.8%
5 years +18.4%+82.4%+228.1% +67.6%
5 years, per year +3.4%+12.8%+26.8% +10.9%
10 years —+168.7%+157.7% +262.0%
10 years, per year —+10.4%+9.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBBCPFERGVASPY
Volatility, 1Y 47.0%26.6%34.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.6%24.6%33.9% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.591.030.95 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.27-0.370.53 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -49.7%-34.3%-40.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -15.5%-23.5%-24.1% -1.2%
52-week high $12.05$74.38$160.39 $779.14
52-week low $5.73$48.86$98.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBBCPFERGVA
P/E now vs peer median 34.8xmedian 28.1x 40.8xmedian 28.1x -20.3xmedian 28.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 0.8x 3.8xmedian 0.8x 1.0xmedian 0.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.3xmedian 12.7x —median 12.7x 7.5xmedian 12.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 24.3xmedian 25.0x 20.9xmedian 25.0x 12.1xmedian 25.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 2.5x 5.9xmedian 2.5x 5.4xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median -1.85median 0.60 —median 0.60 0.18median 0.60

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBBCPFERGVA
Revenue $436.03M – $5.30B
Gross profit $170.20M – $852.16M
Operating income $56.93M – $394.99M
Net income $16.50M – -$250.53M
Free cash flow $21.12M – $443.16M
EPS (diluted) $0.29 – $-5.72
Cash & equivalents $42.98M $5.02B $480.29M
Total debt $418.74M $12.25B $1.56B
Shares (diluted) 51.10M 718.72M 46.26M
Enterprise value $345.94M $21.33B $3.08B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBBCPFERGVA
P/E 34.8x 40.8x -20.3x
P/FCF 24.3x 20.9x 12.1x
P/Operating cash flow 6.2x – 9.2x
P/S 1.2x 3.8x 1.0x
P/B 1.9x 5.9x 5.4x
P/Tangible book 2.9x 6.0x 6.8x
EV/EBITDA 7.3x – 7.5x
EV/EBIT 15.6x – 16.2x
EV/Revenue 2.0x – 1.2x
EV/FCF 42.1x – 14.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.8x – 11.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.85 – 0.18

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBBCPFERGVA
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.2% – 25.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.1% – 16.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.5% – 22.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -1.5% – 28.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 29.7% – 47.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -2.0% – 73.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 57.3% – -223.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -18.9% – -123.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 63.2% – -267.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -18.8% – -113.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.0% – 26.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -2.6% – 77.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -33.4% – 27.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 78.7% – 160.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBBCPFERGVA
Gross margin 39.0% – 16.1%
EBITDA margin 27.9% – 16.2%
Operating margin 13.1% – 7.5%
Pretax margin 5.6% – -2.8%
Net margin 3.4% – -5.0%
FCF margin 4.8% – 8.4%
Operating cash flow margin 18.9% – 11.0%
Return on equity 6.2% – -26.5%
Return on assets 1.8% – -5.2%
Return on invested capital 5.6% – 16.1%
Return on capital employed 6.9% – 14.5%
Asset turnover 0.5x – 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 5.0x – -2.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% – 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBBCPFERGVA
Debt / assets 46.1% 38.0% 34.8%
Debt / equity 1.6x 1.8x 1.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.1x – 1.2x
Debt / FCF 19.8x – 3.5x
Liabilities / assets 70.5% 78.5% 77.7%
Equity / assets 29.5% 21.5% 22.3%
Interest coverage 1.7x – 1.1x
Current ratio 1.7x 1.1x 1.1x
Quick ratio 1.4x 1.1x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.6x 0.7x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 1.11 – 2.60

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBBCPFERGVA
Dividend yield 1.3% 1.3% 0.4%
Net buyback yield 2.3% – 1.5%
Shareholder yield 3.6% 1.3% 2.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – -9.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 5.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 0.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -0.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBBCPFERGVA
Forward P/E 53.6xFY2026 53.2xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.19FY2026 $1.07FY2026 $-3.74FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +111.1%FY2026 -20.7%FY2026 -196.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +63.2% +12.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $411.25MFY2026 $11.77BFY2026 $5.09BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.7%FY2026 +4.1%FY2026 +15.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +6.4% -5.3% +12.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBBCPFERGVA
Held by institutions 33.9% 33.2% 100.0%
Institutions holding 127 337 445
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.2% +17.5% -3.0%
Institutions buying 76 208 239
Institutions selling 31 103 151
Buyers to sellers 2.45 2.02 1.58

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BBCPFERGVA
BBCP 1.00 0.27 0.33
FER 0.27 1.00 0.42
GVA 0.33 0.42 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BBCP, FER and GVA?

Ferrovial (FER) is the largest by market capitalisation: Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) $513.01M, Ferrovial (FER) $41.02B, Granite Construction (GVA) $5.37B.

Which stock is cheaper, BBCP, FER and GVA?

Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) 34.8x, Ferrovial (FER) 40.8x, Granite Construction (GVA) -20.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ferrovial (FER) is cheapest (Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) 53.6x, Ferrovial (FER) 53.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Granite Construction (GVA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) +10.2%, Granite Construction (GVA) +25.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) has the highest net margin (Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) 3.4%, Granite Construction (GVA) -5.0%). On return on invested capital, Granite Construction (GVA) leads (Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) 5.6%, Granite Construction (GVA) 16.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) returned the most: Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) +59.6%, Ferrovial (FER) -9.7%, Granite Construction (GVA) +18.1%. Over five years, Granite Construction (GVA) compounded fastest (Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) +3.4%/yr, Ferrovial (FER) +12.8%/yr, Granite Construction (GVA) +26.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Ferrovial (FER) has the highest dividend yield: Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) 1.28%, Ferrovial (FER) 1.30%, Granite Construction (GVA) 0.43%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ferrovial (FER) has been the steadiest (Concrete Pumping Holdings (BBCP) 47.0%, Ferrovial (FER) 26.6%, Granite Construction (GVA) 34.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BBCP, FER and GVA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ferrovial (FER) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.