BATRA vs MSGS vs RRR Stock Comparison

Atlanta Braves Holdings, Madison Square Garden Sports and Red Rock Resorts Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RRR Red Rock Resorts, Inc.
$48.42 -4.0% 1M -18.3% 1Y
Market cap
$5.08B
P/E
16.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.00B
Div. yield
4.21%
Casinos Consumer Discretionary
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Madison Square Garden Sports leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Madison Square Garden Sports 4, Red Rock Resorts 4, Atlanta Braves Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBATRAMSGSRRRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.49B $7.35B $5.08B MSGS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -54.3x 950.8x 16.6x RRR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 18.8x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.8% +11.0% +0.9% MSGS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -8.6% 0.7% 8.4% RRR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -4.6% — 12.7% RRR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 61.1x 2.9x 4.4x MSGS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 4.21% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +28.0% +34.4% -18.3% MSGS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.2%/yr +10.2%/yr -2.3%/yr BATRA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 19.7% 37.8% 35.2% BATRA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 19/100 38/100 52/100 RRR

Percentile Scorecard

BATRAMSGSRRR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBATRAMSGSRRR
Valuation 7 #41 of 44 16 #37 of 44 35 #29 of 44
Growth 36 #28 of 43 45 #24 of 43 50 #22 of 43
Profitability 17 #35 of 42 44 #24 of 42 90 #5 of 42
Financial Health 17 #39 of 47 48 #25 of 47 28 #34 of 47
Shareholder Returns – – 56 #13 of 28
Overall 19 38 52
  • BATRA ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • MSGS ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • RRR ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBATRAMSGSRRRSPY
1 month -8.9%-24.2%-4.0% +0.9%
3 months -0.8%-23.2%-26.2% +5.9%
6 months +3.9%-8.3%-13.6% +8.5%
Year to date +27.9%+18.1%-21.8% +13.3%
1 year +28.0%+34.4%-18.3% +12.4%
3 years +44.1%+84.9%+23.8% +88.1%
3 years, per year +13.0%+22.8%+7.4% +23.5%
5 years +77.7%+62.5%-11.0% +68.2%
5 years, per year +12.2%+10.2%-2.3% +11.0%
10 years +220.2%+86.8%+116.6% +263.4%
10 years, per year +12.3%+6.4%+8.0% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureBATRAMSGSRRRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 19.7%37.8%35.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 18.2%41.1%38.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.350.450.52 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.420.91-0.52 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -22.4%-32.0%-42.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.9%-26.6%-28.0% -0.9%
52-week high $59.61$416.24$67.26 $779.14
52-week low $41.92$212.91$48.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBATRAMSGSRRR
P/E now vs peer median -54.3xmedian 16.8x 950.8xmedian 16.8x 16.6xmedian 16.8x
P/S now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 1.9x 6.4xmedian 1.9x 2.5xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 375.6xmedian 10.2x 232.4xmedian 10.2x 11.0xmedian 10.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -36.8xmedian 11.2x 120.1xmedian 11.2x 26.3xmedian 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 6.6xmedian 2.2x -27.9xmedian 2.2x 17.4xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.44 -20.90median 0.44 1.73median 0.44

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBATRAMSGSRRR
Revenue $749.97M $1.15B $2.00B
Gross profit $186.76M $320.12M $1.25B
Operating income -$70.66M $28.87M $554.72M
Net income -$63.87M $7.76M $320.78M
Free cash flow -$94.86M $61.26M $193.01M
EPS (diluted) $-0.99 $0.32 $2.87
Cash & equivalents $116.28M $164.51M $136.45M
Total debt $793.13M $1.10B $3.58B
Shares (diluted) 64.97M 24.25M 58.81M
Enterprise value $3.07B $6.95B $4.66B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBATRAMSGSRRR
P/E -54.3x 950.8x 16.6x
P/FCF -36.8x 120.1x 26.3x
P/Operating cash flow -54.4x 117.4x 8.2x
P/S 4.6x 6.4x 2.5x
P/B 6.6x -27.9x 17.4x
P/Tangible book 8.7x -20.0x 23.9x
EV/EBITDA 375.6x 232.4x 11.0x
EV/EBIT -58.9x 258.0x 15.4x
EV/Revenue 5.6x 6.5x 4.3x
EV/FCF -43.9x 121.6x 44.2x
EV/Operating cash flow -65.0x 118.9x 13.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -20.90 1.73

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBATRAMSGSRRR
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.8% 11.0% 0.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.7% 9.1% 5.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.0% 12.7% 1.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 8.8% -1.9% 4.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) -373.9% 94.9% -6.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -19.2% -30.3% -4.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -204.1% 134.6% -4.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 26.6% -45.2% -9.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -198.8% 134.3% 67.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -45.5% 9.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -234.8% -31.6% 10.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -93.9% -25.7% 7.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 14.7% -30.4% -34.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -25.0% -26.0% 37.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBATRAMSGSRRR
Gross margin 24.9% 27.7% 62.1%
EBITDA margin 1.5% 2.8% 38.8%
Operating margin -9.4% 2.5% 27.7%
Pretax margin -10.1% 1.6% 18.2%
Net margin -8.6% 0.7% 8.4%
FCF margin -12.6% 5.3% 9.6%
Operating cash flow margin -8.5% 5.4% 31.1%
Return on equity -12.1% – 118.9%
Return on assets -3.7% 0.5% 7.5%
Return on invested capital -4.6% – 12.7%
Return on capital employed -6.3% 3.3% 14.3%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.8x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x 8.1x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue 3.2% 1.9% 1.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBATRAMSGSRRR
Debt / assets 45.6% 16.8% 82.0%
Debt / equity 1.5x -1.0x 12.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 61.1x 2.9x 4.4x
Debt / FCF -8.4x 4.2x 18.5x
Liabilities / assets 69.7% 117.1% 93.3%
Equity / assets 30.3% -17.1% 6.7%
Interest coverage -1.5x 1.4x 2.8x
Current ratio 0.5x 0.5x 0.7x
Quick ratio 0.3x 0.4x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.3x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 1.28 2.90 1.64

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBATRAMSGSRRR
Dividend yield – – 4.2%
Net buyback yield – – 1.7%
Shareholder yield – 0.0% 5.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 55.2%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 91.8%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 19.9%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 18.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBATRAMSGSRRR
Forward P/E – – 18.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.56FY2026 $-1.03FY2027 $2.58FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -421.9%FY2027 +41.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +20.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $843.34MFY2026 $1.06BFY2027 $1.96BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.1%FY2026 -7.9%FY2027 -2.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.1% +1.5% +2.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBATRAMSGSRRR
Held by institutions 12.1% 81.3% 90.4%
Institutions holding 207 463 245
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.4% +10.3% +2.8%
Institutions buying 93 247 122
Institutions selling 43 136 95
Buyers to sellers 2.16 1.82 1.28

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BATRAMSGSRRR
BATRA 1.00 0.22 0.21
MSGS 0.22 1.00 0.21
RRR 0.21 0.21 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BATRA, MSGS and RRR?

Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) $3.49B, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) $7.35B, Red Rock Resorts (RRR) $5.08B.

Which stock is cheaper, BATRA, MSGS and RRR?

Red Rock Resorts (RRR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) -54.3x, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) 950.8x, Red Rock Resorts (RRR) 16.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) +6.8%, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) +11.0%, Red Rock Resorts (RRR) +0.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Red Rock Resorts (RRR) has the highest net margin (Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) -8.6%, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) 0.7%, Red Rock Resorts (RRR) 8.4%). On return on invested capital, Red Rock Resorts (RRR) leads (Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) -4.6%, Red Rock Resorts (RRR) 12.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) returned the most: Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) +28.0%, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) +34.4%, Red Rock Resorts (RRR) -18.3%. Over five years, Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) compounded fastest (Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) +12.2%/yr, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) +10.2%/yr, Red Rock Resorts (RRR) -2.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) 0.00%, Red Rock Resorts (RRR) 4.21%. Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) and Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) has been the steadiest (Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) 19.7%, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) 37.8%, Red Rock Resorts (RRR) 35.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BATRA, MSGS and RRR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.