BATRA vs LUCK vs MSGS Stock Comparison

Atlanta Braves Holdings, Lucky Strike Entertainment and Madison Square Garden Sports Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Madison Square Garden Sports leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Madison Square Garden Sports 6, Lucky Strike Entertainment 2, Atlanta Braves Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBATRALUCKMSGSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.48B $596.40M $9.26B MSGS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -54.2x -12.8x 1,197x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.8% +3.7% +11.0% MSGS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -8.6% -3.7% 0.7% MSGS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -4.6% 9.0% — LUCK
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 61.1x 6.5x 2.9x MSGS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +27.4% -50.8% +68.6% MSGS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.2%/yr -16.4%/yr +15.9%/yr MSGS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 19.8% 54.2% 29.7% BATRA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 18/100 43/100 37/100 LUCK

Percentile Scorecard

BATRALUCKMSGS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBATRALUCKMSGS
Valuation 7 #41 of 44 58 #19 of 44 16 #37 of 44
Growth 31 #30 of 43 12 #38 of 43 45 #24 of 43
Profitability 18 #34 of 41 48 #22 of 41 45 #23 of 41
Financial Health 17 #39 of 47 9 #43 of 47 41 #28 of 47
Shareholder Returns – 89 #4 of 28 –
Overall 18 43 37
  • BATRA ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • LUCK ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • MSGS ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBATRALUCKMSGSSPY
1 month -8.0%-21.3%-4.6% -0.8%
3 months -1.3%-41.7%-3.2% +3.5%
6 months +1.5%-44.5%+14.7% +7.0%
Year to date +27.8%-51.5%+48.6% +12.2%
1 year +27.4%-50.8%+68.6% +13.0%
3 years +44.1%-60.3%+132.7% +86.3%
3 years, per year +13.0%-26.5%+32.5% +23.1%
5 years +77.5%-59.1%+108.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year +12.2%-16.4%+15.9% +11.0%
10 years +214.8%—+135.9% +258.0%
10 years, per year +12.2%—+9.0% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBATRALUCKMSGSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 19.8%54.2%29.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 18.1%59.0%23.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.351.040.53 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.38-0.942.31 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -22.4%-76.0%-32.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.9%-56.7%-7.6% -1.8%
52-week high $59.61$9.49$416.24 $779.14
52-week low $41.92$4.11$212.91 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBATRALUCKMSGS
P/E now vs peer median -54.3xmedian 17.1x -12.1xmedian 17.1x 1,197xmedian 17.1x
P/S now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 1.9x 0.5xmedian 1.9x 8.0xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 375.5xmedian 10.9x 8.6xmedian 10.9x 291.8xmedian 10.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -36.7xmedian 11.4x -57.4xmedian 11.4x 151.1xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 6.6xmedian 2.5x -1.4xmedian 2.5x -35.2xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.57 0.26median 0.57 -26.31median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBATRALUCKMSGS
Revenue $749.97M $1.25B $1.15B
Gross profit $186.76M $844.13M $320.12M
Operating income -$70.66M $136.79M $28.87M
Net income -$63.87M -$35.78M $7.76M
Free cash flow -$94.86M -$9.78M $61.26M
EPS (diluted) $-0.99 $-0.34 $0.32
Cash & equivalents $116.28M – $164.51M
Total debt $793.13M $1.78B $1.10B
Shares (diluted) 64.97M 136.63M 24.25M
Enterprise value $3.04B $596.40M $8.86B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBATRALUCKMSGS
P/E -54.3x -12.1x 1,197x
P/FCF -36.7x -57.4x 151.1x
P/Operating cash flow -54.4x 5.4x 147.7x
P/S 4.6x 0.5x 8.0x
P/B 6.6x -1.4x -35.2x
P/Tangible book 8.6x -1.3x -25.2x
EV/EBITDA 375.5x 8.6x 291.8x
EV/EBIT -58.9x 17.1x 323.9x
EV/Revenue 5.5x 1.9x 8.1x
EV/FCF -43.9x -239.5x 152.7x
EV/Operating cash flow -65.0x 22.6x 149.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.26 -26.31

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBATRALUCKMSGS
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.8% 3.7% 11.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.7% 5.6% 9.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.0% 2.2% 12.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 8.8% 35.1% -1.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -373.9% -0.3% 94.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -19.2% -12.0% -30.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -204.1% -257.0% 134.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 26.6% -34.6% -45.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -198.8% -154.5% 134.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -46.2% -45.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -234.8% -41.4% -31.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -93.9% -21.9% -25.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 14.7% -127.1% -30.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -25.0% -28.9% -26.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBATRALUCKMSGS
Gross margin 24.9% 67.8% 27.7%
EBITDA margin 1.5% 22.0% 2.8%
Operating margin -9.4% 11.0% 2.5%
Pretax margin -10.1% -3.2% 1.6%
Net margin -8.6% -3.7% 0.7%
FCF margin -12.6% -0.8% 5.3%
Operating cash flow margin -8.5% 8.3% 5.4%
Return on equity -12.1% – –
Return on assets -3.7% -1.1% 0.5%
Return on invested capital -4.6% 9.0% –
Return on capital employed -6.3% 4.5% 3.3%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.4x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x -2.9x 8.1x
Stock comp / revenue 3.2% 1.0% 1.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBATRALUCKMSGS
Debt / assets 45.6% 55.2% 16.8%
Debt / equity 1.5x -4.5x -1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 61.1x 6.5x 2.9x
Debt / FCF -8.4x -182.1x 4.2x
Liabilities / assets 69.7% 112.3% 117.1%
Equity / assets 30.3% -12.3% -17.1%
Interest coverage -1.5x – 1.4x
Current ratio 0.5x 0.5x 0.5x
Quick ratio 0.3x – 0.4x
Cash ratio 0.2x – 0.3x
Altman Z-score 1.28 0.43 3.53

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBATRALUCKMSGS
Dividend yield – 5.8% –
Net buyback yield – 6.3% –
Shareholder yield – 12.1% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBATRALUCKMSGS
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.56FY2026 $-0.06FY2027 $-1.03FY2027
EPS growth, next FY – – -421.9%FY2027
Revenue, next fiscal year $843.34MFY2026 $1.22BFY2027 $1.06BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +15.1%FY2026 -2.1%FY2027 -7.9%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +3.1% +14.8% +1.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBATRALUCKMSGS
Held by institutions 12.1% 50.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding 207 55 463
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.4% -0.8% +10.3%
Institutions buying 93 24 247
Institutions selling 43 20 136
Buyers to sellers 2.16 1.20 1.82

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BATRALUCKMSGS
BATRA 1.00 0.26 0.27
LUCK 0.26 1.00 0.22
MSGS 0.27 0.22 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BATRA, LUCK and MSGS?

Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) $3.48B, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) $596.40M, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) $9.26B.

Which company is growing faster?

Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) +6.8%, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) +3.7%, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) +11.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) has the highest net margin (Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) -8.6%, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) -3.7%, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) 0.7%). On return on invested capital, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) leads (Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) -4.6%, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) 9.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) returned the most: Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) +27.4%, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) -50.8%, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) +68.6%. Over five years, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) compounded fastest (Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) +12.2%/yr, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) -16.4%/yr, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) +15.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) has been the steadiest (Atlanta Braves Holdings (BATRA) 19.8%, Lucky Strike Entertainment (LUCK) 54.2%, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) 29.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BATRA, LUCK and MSGS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Madison Square Garden Sports (MSGS) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.