BAND vs RNG vs TWLO Stock Comparison

Bandwidth, RingCentral and Twilio Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BAND Bandwidth Inc.
$44.18 -25.3% 1M +170.0% 1Y
Market cap
$1.51B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$828.24M
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
RNG RingCentral, Inc.
$83.43 +5.3% 1M +186.3% 1Y
Market cap
$7.28B
P/E
11.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.62B
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
6 wins
TWLO Twilio Inc
$261.66 -10.0% 1M +136.1% 1Y
Market cap
$40.41B
P/E
35.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.57B
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

RingCentral leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (RingCentral 6, Twilio 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBANDRNGTWLOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.51B $7.28B $40.41B TWLO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -600.6x 11.0x 35.2x RNG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 25.8x 16.0x 45.8x RNG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.3% +5.5% +17.8% TWLO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -0.3% 25.3% 20.6% RNG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% 26.1% 3.1% RNG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.2x 1.5x -3.2x TWLO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +170.0% +186.3% +136.1% RNG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -12.8%/yr -19.6%/yr -6.1%/yr TWLO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 94.8% 67.6% 62.2% TWLO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 33/100 59/100 57/100 RNG

Percentile Scorecard

BANDRNGTWLO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBANDRNGTWLO
Valuation 41 #18 of 30 72 #9 of 30 24 #23 of 30
Growth 27 #20 of 27 65 #10 of 27 96 #2 of 27
Profitability 28 #19 of 26 76 #7 of 26 40 #16 of 26
Financial Health 45 #18 of 32 19 #26 of 32 87 #5 of 32
Shareholder Returns 25 #13 of 17 63 #7 of 17 38 #11 of 17
Overall 33 59 57
  • BAND ranked among 33 companies in Workplace Software
  • RNG ranked among 33 companies in Workplace Software
  • TWLO ranked among 33 companies in Workplace Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBANDRNGTWLOSPY
1 month -25.3%+5.3%-10.0% -1.0%
3 months -26.1%+72.5%+36.7% +2.9%
6 months +83.2%+104.0%+82.0% +6.4%
Year to date +186.0%+188.9%+84.0% +11.4%
1 year +170.0%+186.3%+136.1% +13.1%
3 years +332.7%+209.1%+388.0% +79.4%
3 years, per year +63.0%+45.7%+69.7% +21.5%
5 years -49.7%-66.4%-26.9% +67.7%
5 years, per year -12.8%-19.6%-6.1% +10.9%
10 years —+276.7%+537.3% +255.2%
10 years, per year —+14.2%+20.3% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureBANDRNGTWLOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 94.8%67.6%62.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 91.0%56.0%52.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.421.131.37 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.792.762.19 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.3%-92.4%-88.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -43.7%0.0%-13.6% -2.5%
52-week high $78.44$83.43$302.99 $779.14
52-week low $12.82$24.82$108.49 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBANDRNGTWLO
P/E now vs peer median -563.7xmedian 32.3x 10.6xmedian 32.3x 34.8xmedian 32.3x
P/S now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 2.4x 2.7xmedian 2.4x 7.2xmedian 2.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 30.8xmedian 11.5x 13.7xmedian 11.5x 74.2xmedian 11.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 17.6xmedian 14.2x 10.6xmedian 14.2x 38.3xmedian 14.2x
P/B now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 2.7x -568.9xmedian 2.7x 4.5xmedian 2.7x
PEG now vs peer median 20.19median 0.77 0.19median 0.77 0.76median 0.77

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBANDRNGTWLO
Revenue $828.24M $2.62B $5.57B
Gross profit $308.33M $1.89B $2.70B
Operating income -$15.11M $196.64M $289.94M
Net income $2.26M $662.40M $1.15B
Free cash flow $77.35M $667.24M $1.05B
R&D $145.95M $330.14M $1.06B
EPS (diluted) $-0.08 $7.55 $7.19
Cash & equivalents $169.90M $110.12M $823.26M
Total debt $330.77M $1.01B $993.16M
Shares (diluted) 33.49M 87.69M 159.71M
Enterprise value $1.10B $6.81B $30.48B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBANDRNGTWLO
P/E -563.7x 10.6x 34.8x
P/FCF 17.6x 10.6x 38.3x
P/Operating cash flow 13.8x 10.1x 37.9x
P/S 1.6x 2.7x 7.2x
P/B 3.6x -568.9x 4.5x
P/Tangible book 5.3x -124.9x 4.5x
EV/EBITDA 30.8x 13.7x 74.2x
EV/EBIT -100.4x 40.4x 132.9x
EV/Revenue 1.8x 3.0x 6.9x
EV/FCF 19.6x 11.9x 36.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.4x 11.4x 36.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 20.19 0.19 0.76

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBANDRNGTWLO
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.3% 5.5% 17.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.0% 6.7% 11.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.3% 7.0% 14.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 8.4% 8.0% 11.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) -25.9% 109.8% 320.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 18.3% 35.4% 31.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 122.6% 4,905% 5,574%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -58.8% 53.9% 43.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 77.6% 5,149% 5,574%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -27.9% 55.7% 45.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.9% 16.3% 35.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 46.5% 29.1% 96.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 14.0% 16.5% 35.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 117.7% 30.7% 89.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBANDRNGTWLO
Gross margin 37.2% 72.2% 48.5%
EBITDA margin 5.9% 22.2% 9.3%
Operating margin -1.8% 7.5% 5.2%
Pretax margin -0.7% 5.0% 3.1%
Net margin -0.3% 25.3% 20.6%
FCF margin 9.3% 25.5% 18.8%
Operating cash flow margin 11.9% 26.7% 19.0%
Return on equity 0.6% – 13.7%
Return on assets 0.2% 40.7% 11.3%
Return on invested capital 0.0% 26.1% 3.1%
Return on capital employed -1.7% 20.7% 3.1%
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.6x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 43.5x 1.1x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue 6.3% 9.2% 10.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBANDRNGTWLO
Debt / assets 30.0% 53.9% 9.2%
Debt / equity 0.9x -81.6x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.2x 1.5x -3.2x
Debt / FCF 4.3x 1.5x 0.9x
Liabilities / assets 65.7% 100.7% 17.2%
Equity / assets 34.3% -0.7% 82.8%
Interest coverage – 3.1x –
Current ratio 2.0x 1.1x 4.6x
Quick ratio 2.3x 0.9x 4.2x
Cash ratio 1.2x 0.2x 3.3x
Altman Z-score 1.91 3.19 12.92

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBANDRNGTWLO
Dividend yield – 0.3% –
Net buyback yield 1.5% 4.6% 2.0%
Shareholder yield 1.5% 4.9% 2.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBANDRNGTWLO
Forward P/E 25.8xFY2026 16.0xFY2026 45.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.71FY2026 $5.20FY2026 $5.71FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +19.6%FY2026 +19.3%FY2026 +16.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +15.8% +3.3% +23.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $938.18MFY2026 $2.75BFY2026 $6.37BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +24.5%FY2026 +9.3%FY2026 +25.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -3.9% -4.3% +1.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBANDRNGTWLO
Held by institutions 98.8% 100.0% 90.3%
Institutions holding 240 379 963
Change in shares held, QoQ +27.1% +2.0% +1.9%
Institutions buying 171 212 543
Institutions selling 52 121 310
Buyers to sellers 3.29 1.75 1.75

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BANDRNGTWLO
BAND 1.00 0.31 0.46
RNG 0.31 1.00 0.50
TWLO 0.46 0.50 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BAND, RNG and TWLO?

Twilio (TWLO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bandwidth (BAND) $1.51B, RingCentral (RNG) $7.28B, Twilio (TWLO) $40.41B.

Which stock is cheaper, BAND, RNG and TWLO?

RingCentral (RNG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Bandwidth (BAND) -600.6x, RingCentral (RNG) 11.0x, Twilio (TWLO) 35.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, RingCentral (RNG) is cheapest (Bandwidth (BAND) 25.8x, RingCentral (RNG) 16.0x, Twilio (TWLO) 45.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Twilio (TWLO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bandwidth (BAND) +9.3%, RingCentral (RNG) +5.5%, Twilio (TWLO) +17.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

RingCentral (RNG) has the highest net margin (Bandwidth (BAND) -0.3%, RingCentral (RNG) 25.3%, Twilio (TWLO) 20.6%). On return on invested capital, RingCentral (RNG) leads (Bandwidth (BAND) 0.0%, RingCentral (RNG) 26.1%, Twilio (TWLO) 3.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year RingCentral (RNG) returned the most: Bandwidth (BAND) +170.0%, RingCentral (RNG) +186.3%, Twilio (TWLO) +136.1%. Over five years, Twilio (TWLO) compounded fastest (Bandwidth (BAND) -12.8%/yr, RingCentral (RNG) -19.6%/yr, Twilio (TWLO) -6.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Twilio (TWLO) has been the steadiest (Bandwidth (BAND) 94.8%, RingCentral (RNG) 67.6%, Twilio (TWLO) 62.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BAND, RNG and TWLO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, RingCentral (RNG) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.