BAND vs COE vs SANG Stock Comparison

Bandwidth, 51Talk Online Education and Sangoma Technologies Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BAND Bandwidth Inc.
$53.11 -14.7% 1M +216.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.49B
P/E
375.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$870.37M
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
3 wins
SANG Sangoma Technologies Corp
$4.71 -4.5% 1M -7.5% 1Y
Market cap
$157.25M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$203.08M
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
1 win

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Bandwidth leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Bandwidth 3, 51Talk Online Education 3, Sangoma Technologies 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBANDCOESANGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.49B $269.33M $157.25M BAND
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 375.3x -15.8x -2.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 31.1x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +15.1% +74.9% -14.2% COE
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -14.1% -39.0% COE
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 54.0% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 0.2x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +216.7% -77.7% -7.5% BAND
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -9.0%/yr +3.5%/yr -26.5%/yr COE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 95.5% 72.4% 51.2% SANG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 44/100 41/100 BAND

Percentile Scorecard

BANDCOESANG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBANDCOESANG
Valuation 50 #15 of 29 48 #47 of 89 93 #3 of 29
Growth 50 #14 of 27 63 #31 of 81 0 #27 of 27
Profitability 64 #10 of 26 52 #37 of 76 44 #15 of 26
Financial Health 53 #15 of 31 12 #82 of 93 47 #17 of 31
Shareholder Returns – – 21 #12 of 15
Overall 54 44 41
  • BAND ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software
  • COE ranked among 98 companies in Vertical Software
  • SANG ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBANDCOESANGSPY
1 month -14.7%-6.1%-4.5% +0.7%
3 months +36.8%-36.4%+15.7% +3.7%
6 months +44.3%-61.7%+10.3% +7.1%
Year to date +243.8%-65.5%-7.1% +12.8%
1 year +216.7%-77.7%-7.5% +11.9%
3 years +435.9%+38.0%+65.3% +85.2%
3 years, per year +75.1%+11.3%+18.2% +22.8%
5 years -37.7%+18.5%-78.6% +67.6%
5 years, per year -9.0%+3.5%-26.5% +10.9%
10 years —-84.6%+124.3% +262.0%
10 years, per year —-17.1%+8.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBANDCOESANGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 95.5%72.4%51.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 91.4%76.3%42.2% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.430.870.19 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.27-1.07-0.15 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.3%-82.0%-89.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -32.3%-77.7%-12.8% -1.2%
52-week high $78.44$49.42$5.40 $779.14
52-week low $12.82$10.01$3.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBANDCOESANG
P/E now vs peer median 429.8xmedian 33.1x -15.3xmedian 39.2x -2.0xmedian 33.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 2.5x 2.2xmedian 2.4x 0.8xmedian 2.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 9.8x —median 17.3x 1.7xmedian 9.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 24.8xmedian 15.2x —median 20.3x 7.2xmedian 15.2x
P/B now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 3.1x -7.1xmedian 1.8x 0.9xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median -10.01median 0.74 0.96median 1.52 0.05median 0.74

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBANDCOESANG
Revenue $870.37M $120.53M $203.08M
Gross profit $319.33M $88.35M $143.68M
Operating income -$11.31M -$13.29M $66.76M
Net income $8.75M -$11.57M -$81.09M
Free cash flow – – $21.92M
R&D $149.43M $7.56M $42.90M
EPS (diluted) $0.12 $-0.72 $-2.38
Cash & equivalents $171.32M $39.98M $10.43M
Total debt – – $89.10M
Shares (diluted) 33.49M 23.67M 33.24M
Enterprise value $1.49B $132.62M $98.75M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBANDCOESANG
P/E 429.8x -15.3x -2.0x
P/FCF 24.8x – 7.2x
P/Operating cash flow 14.4x – 6.6x
P/S 1.9x 2.2x 0.8x
P/B 4.3x -7.1x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 6.1x -7.1x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA – – 1.7x
EV/EBIT – -16.8x 2.6x
EV/Revenue 1.9x 1.9x 0.9x
EV/FCF – – 7.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 14.4x – 7.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -10.01 0.96 0.05

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBANDCOESANG
Revenue growth (1Y) 15.1% 74.9% -14.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 13.7% 77.8% -7.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 8.8% 67.1% -11.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 10.3% 73.8% -6.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 13.8% -110.8% -18.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 29.6% -9.0% -18.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 175.0% -114.9% -1,519%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -32.2% 35.6% -40.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 130.8% -132.4% -1,493%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -42.9% -16.0% -39.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 30.3% – -43.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 55.5% – -9.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – -50.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -8.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBANDCOESANG
Gross margin – 73.3% 70.7%
EBITDA margin – – 50.3%
Operating margin – -11.0% 32.9%
Pretax margin – -12.5% -41.7%
Net margin – -14.1% -39.0%
FCF margin – – 10.8%
Operating cash flow margin 13.1% – 11.7%
Return on equity 2.3% – -87.1%
Return on assets 0.8% -17.1% –
Return on invested capital – – 54.0%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.8x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 13.0x – -0.3x
Stock comp / revenue 6.2% – 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBANDCOESANG
Debt / assets – – 11.6%
Debt / equity – – 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 0.2x
Debt / FCF – – 1.2x
Liabilities / assets 65.1% 153.1% 25.8%
Equity / assets 34.9% -53.1% 74.2%
Interest coverage – – 33.0x
Current ratio 1.9x 0.6x 0.8x
Quick ratio – 0.4x 0.5x
Cash ratio – 0.4x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – – 1.94

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBANDCOESANG
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – -0.1%
Shareholder yield – 0.0% -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBANDCOESANG
Forward P/E 31.1xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.71FY2026 $-0.06FY2027 $-0.17FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +19.6%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +15.8% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $938.18MFY2026 $179.19MFY2026 $192.47MFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +24.5%FY2026 +89.7%FY2026 -3.8%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after -3.9% +56.9% +3.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBANDCOESANG
Held by institutions 98.8% – –
Institutions holding 241 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +27.1% – –
Institutions buying 171 – –
Institutions selling 52 – –
Buyers to sellers 3.29 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BANDCOESANG
BAND 1.00 0.01 0.07
COE 0.01 1.00 -0.02
SANG 0.07 -0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BAND, COE and SANG?

Bandwidth (BAND) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bandwidth (BAND) $1.49B, 51Talk Online Education (COE) $269.33M, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) $157.25M.

Which company is growing faster?

51Talk Online Education (COE) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bandwidth (BAND) +15.1%, 51Talk Online Education (COE) +74.9%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -14.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

51Talk Online Education (COE) has the highest net margin (51Talk Online Education (COE) -14.1%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -39.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bandwidth (BAND) returned the most: Bandwidth (BAND) +216.7%, 51Talk Online Education (COE) -77.7%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -7.5%. Over five years, 51Talk Online Education (COE) compounded fastest (Bandwidth (BAND) -9.0%/yr, 51Talk Online Education (COE) +3.5%/yr, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -26.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) has been the steadiest (Bandwidth (BAND) 95.5%, 51Talk Online Education (COE) 72.4%, Sangoma Technologies (SANG) 51.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BAND, COE and SANG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bandwidth (BAND) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.