BAH vs IT vs G Stock Comparison

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding, Gartner and Genpact Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
IT Gartner Inc
$231.21 +23.1% 1M -7.6% 1Y
Market cap
$14.66B
P/E
18.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.46B
Div. yield
–
Consulting Industrials
3 wins
G Genpact LTD
$40.47 +22.3% 1M +2.5% 1Y
Market cap
$6.63B
P/E
11.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.25B
Div. yield
0.02%
Consulting Industrials
7 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Genpact leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Genpact 7, Gartner 3, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBAHITGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.94B $14.66B $6.63B IT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.7x 18.9x 11.4x G
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.4x 15.2x 9.2x G
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -6.2% +0.7% +6.5% G
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.1% 12.0% 11.1% IT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 17.1% 28.6% 15.3% IT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.4x 1.1x 0.8x G
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -8.8% -7.6% +2.5% G
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +0.9%/yr -6.3%/yr -3.9%/yr BAH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 42.2% 57.5% 40.9% G
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 64/100 65/100 71/100 G

Percentile Scorecard

BAHITG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBAHITG
Valuation 76 #28 of 112 60 #45 of 112 83 #20 of 112
Growth 62 #37 of 96 30 #68 of 96 54 #45 of 96
Profitability 84 #15 of 91 93 #7 of 91 79 #20 of 91
Financial Health 29 #89 of 125 44 #71 of 125 73 #34 of 125
Shareholder Returns 71 #20 of 67 99 #2 of 67 64 #25 of 67
Overall 64 65 71
  • BAH ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • IT ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • G ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBAHITGSPY
1 month +14.3%+23.1%+22.3% -0.8%
3 months +16.4%+56.7%+25.8% +3.5%
6 months +9.4%+55.4%+19.6% +7.0%
Year to date -1.2%-8.4%-13.5% +12.2%
1 year -8.8%-7.6%+2.5% +13.0%
3 years -29.0%-29.0%+23.1% +86.3%
3 years, per year -10.8%-10.8%+7.2% +23.1%
5 years +4.6%-27.9%-18.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year +0.9%-6.3%-3.9% +11.0%
10 years +169.0%+170.3%+70.0% +258.0%
10 years, per year +10.4%+10.5%+5.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBAHITGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 42.2%57.5%40.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.0%58.5%37.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.200.350.08 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.21-0.130.06 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.9%-77.2%-50.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -18.5%-9.5%-16.6% -1.8%
52-week high $102.23$255.58$48.50 $779.14
52-week low $59.71$125.73$27.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBAHITG
P/E now vs peer median 12.7xmedian 21.9x 19.8xmedian 21.9x 11.7xmedian 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 0.9x 2.3xmedian 0.9x 1.3xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.7xmedian 12.2x 12.3xmedian 12.2x 8.5xmedian 12.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.1xmedian 14.3x 11.3xmedian 14.3x 11.9xmedian 14.3x
P/B now vs peer median 8.0xmedian 2.3x -87.2xmedian 2.3x 2.6xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.30median 1.02 103.21median 1.02 0.74median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBAHITG
Revenue $10.98B $6.46B $5.25B
Gross profit $5.77B $4.50B $1.91B
Operating income $1.02B $1.12B $778.63M
Net income $784.00M $775.35M $582.65M
Free cash flow $984.00M $1.29B $572.11M
EPS (diluted) $6.56 $11.65 $3.42
Cash & equivalents $334.00M $1.49B $517.39M
Total debt $4.41B $2.98B $1.18B
Shares (diluted) 119.59M 66.58M 170.43M
Enterprise value $7.45B $8.35B $3.24B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBAHITG
P/E 12.7x 19.8x 11.7x
P/FCF 10.1x 11.3x 11.9x
P/Operating cash flow 9.2x 10.6x 10.6x
P/S 0.9x 2.3x 1.3x
P/B 8.0x -87.2x 2.6x
P/Tangible book 25.5x -31.6x 2.7x
EV/EBITDA 11.7x 12.3x 8.5x
EV/EBIT 13.8x 14.4x 9.6x
EV/Revenue 1.3x 2.5x 1.4x
EV/FCF 14.2x 12.5x 13.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.0x 11.6x 11.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.30 103.21 0.74

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBAHITG
Revenue growth (1Y) -6.2% 0.7% 6.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.1% 4.0% 6.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -7.8% 3.2% 9.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 2.4% 4.6% 7.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) -8.0% -4.6% 5.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 25.3% -4.4% 11.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -5.1% -38.7% 8.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 38.5% -5.7% 12.6%
EPS growth (1Y) -2.5% -28.8% 12.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 42.9% 0.2% 15.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 18.2% -14.8% -0.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 61.2% 7.3% 2.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 20.1% -14.7% 1.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 75.1% 8.8% 1.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBAHITG
Gross margin 52.5% 69.6% 36.5%
EBITDA margin 10.9% 20.3% 16.7%
Operating margin 9.3% 17.3% 14.8%
Pretax margin 7.9% 15.9% 14.5%
Net margin 7.1% 12.0% 11.1%
FCF margin 9.0% 19.9% 10.9%
Operating cash flow margin 9.8% 21.4% 12.3%
Return on equity 64.1% – 22.9%
Return on assets 9.9% 10.4% 10.6%
Return on invested capital 17.1% 28.6% 15.3%
Return on capital employed 17.1% 29.7% 17.6%
Asset turnover 1.4x 0.9x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 1.8x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 2.3% 1.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBAHITG
Debt / assets 53.1% 41.4% 21.8%
Debt / equity 3.5x -17.8x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.4x 1.1x 0.8x
Debt / FCF 4.5x 2.3x 2.1x
Liabilities / assets 85.0% 102.3% 51.9%
Equity / assets 15.0% -2.3% 48.1%
Interest coverage – 7.8x –
Current ratio 1.4x 0.9x 2.0x
Quick ratio 2.2x 0.7x 1.8x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.4x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 3.35 3.93 3.53

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBAHITG
Dividend yield 2.8% – 1.8%
Net buyback yield 3.4% 17.9% 4.4%
Shareholder yield 6.2% 17.9% 6.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 20.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 21.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 7.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 8.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBAHITG
Forward P/E 12.4xFY2026 15.2xFY2026 9.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.72FY2026 $15.20FY2026 $4.40FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +3.2%FY2026 +15.4%FY2026 +20.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -3.1% +11.6% +8.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $11.71BFY2026 $6.72BFY2026 $5.32BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.4%FY2026 +3.4%FY2026 +4.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.9% +3.5% +3.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBAHITG
Held by institutions 96.5% 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 557 650 476
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.0% -0.6% +2.2%
Institutions buying 283 281 247
Institutions selling 202 291 199
Buyers to sellers 1.40 0.97 1.24

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BAHITG
BAH 1.00 0.43 0.50
IT 0.43 1.00 0.68
G 0.50 0.68 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BAH, IT and G?

Gartner (IT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) $9.94B, Gartner (IT) $14.66B, Genpact (G) $6.63B.

Which stock is cheaper, BAH, IT and G?

Genpact (G) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 12.7x, Gartner (IT) 18.9x, Genpact (G) 11.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Genpact (G) is cheapest (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 12.4x, Gartner (IT) 15.2x, Genpact (G) 9.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Genpact (G) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) -6.2%, Gartner (IT) +0.7%, Genpact (G) +6.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Gartner (IT) has the highest net margin (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 7.1%, Gartner (IT) 12.0%, Genpact (G) 11.1%). On return on invested capital, Gartner (IT) leads (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 17.1%, Gartner (IT) 28.6%, Genpact (G) 15.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Genpact (G) returned the most: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) -8.8%, Gartner (IT) -7.6%, Genpact (G) +2.5%. Over five years, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) compounded fastest (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) +0.9%/yr, Gartner (IT) -6.3%/yr, Genpact (G) -3.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 0.00%, Gartner (IT) 0.00%, Genpact (G) 0.02%. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) and Gartner (IT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Genpact (G) has been the steadiest (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding (BAH) 42.2%, Gartner (IT) 57.5%, Genpact (G) 40.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BAH, IT and G?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Genpact (G) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.