BAC vs UBS vs ING Stock Comparison

Bank Of America, UBS Group AG and Ing Groep Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BAC Bank Of America Corp /De/
$50.54 -10.8% 1M -3.9% 1Y
Market cap
$362.82B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$121.10B
Div. yield
0.03%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
3 wins
UBS UBS Group AG
$46.47 -6.4% 1M +22.2% 1Y
Market cap
$147.91B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
1 win
ING Ing Groep Nv
$32.33 -11.5% 1M +34.9% 1Y
Market cap
$97.33B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
1 win

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

Bank Of America leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Bank Of America 3, Ing Groep 1, UBS Group AG 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBACUBSINGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $362.82B $147.91B $97.33B BAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.3x — — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.2x 12.2x 12.1x BAC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.7% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 26.5% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 13.1% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.6x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.03% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -3.9% +22.2% +34.9% ING
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.4%/yr +20.8%/yr +16.4%/yr UBS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.9% 27.0% 27.8% BAC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 71/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

BACUBSING

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBACUBSING
Valuation 96 #17 of 362 – –
Growth 83 #39 of 221 – –
Profitability 74 #52 of 200 – –
Financial Health 24 #154 of 203 23 #157 of 203 22 #159 of 203
Shareholder Returns 77 #79 of 342 9 #311 of 342 93 #24 of 342
Overall 71 – –
  • BAC ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • UBS ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • ING ranked among 370 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBACUBSINGSPY
1 month -10.8%-6.4%-11.5% -0.8%
3 months -18.7%-11.6%-3.5% +3.5%
6 months -4.0%+10.2%+15.2% +7.0%
Year to date -8.1%+0.3%+15.5% +12.2%
1 year -3.9%+22.2%+34.9% +13.0%
3 years +100.8%+98.9%+156.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year +26.2%+25.8%+36.8% +23.1%
5 years +7.4%+157.6%+113.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year +1.4%+20.8%+16.4% +11.0%
10 years +199.6%+237.5%+148.9% +258.0%
10 years, per year +11.6%+12.9%+9.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureBACUBSINGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.9%27.0%27.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 25.6%28.2%26.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.721.271.35 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.180.821.25 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -49.0%-34.3%-47.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -22.0%-16.6%-13.2% -1.8%
52-week high $64.82$55.73$37.26 $779.14
52-week low $46.72$36.41$24.17 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBACUBSING
P/E now vs peer median 11.2xmedian 12.1x —median 12.1x —median 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 3.4x —median 3.4x —median 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 5.0x —median 5.0x —median 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 3.7xmedian 11.0x —median 11.0x —median 11.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 1.2x 1.7xmedian 1.2x 1.5xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 1.40median 1.36 —median 1.36 —median 1.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBACUBSING
Revenue $121.10B – –
Net income $33.66B – –
Free cash flow $94.74B – –
EPS (diluted) $4.41 – –
Cash & equivalents $229.75B $215.72B $74.19B
Total debt $399.84B $104.15B $21.78B
Shares (diluted) 7.29B 3.29B 2.99B
Enterprise value -$2.01T -$782.21B -$446.12B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBACUBSING
P/E 11.2x – –
P/FCF 3.7x – –
P/Operating cash flow 3.7x – –
P/S 2.9x – –
P/B 1.2x 1.7x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 1.2x 1.7x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 1.4x – –
EV/EBIT 1.4x – –
EV/Revenue 1.4x – –
EV/FCF 1.8x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 1.8x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.40 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBACUBSING
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.7% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.4% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 20.5% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 4.2% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 27.5% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.0% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 517.8% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 28.5% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 517.8% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 28.5% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBACUBSING
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 99.4% – –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 36.2% – –
Net margin 26.5% – –
FCF margin 78.2% – –
Operating cash flow margin 78.2% – –
Return on equity 11.2% – –
Return on assets 1.0% – –
Return on invested capital 13.1% – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.8x – –
Stock comp / revenue 3.4% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBACUBSING
Debt / assets 11.4% 1.7% 1.6%
Debt / equity 1.3x 0.3x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA -1.6x – –
Debt / FCF 4.2x – –
Liabilities / assets 91.4% 94.8% 95.3%
Equity / assets 8.6% 5.2% 4.7%
Interest coverage 1.6x – –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBACUBSING
Dividend yield 2.3% 1.2% 4.7%
Net buyback yield 6.6% – –
Shareholder yield 8.9% 1.2% 4.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) 29.0% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 10.3% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 2.6% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 3.5% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBACUBSING
Forward P/E 11.2xFY2026 12.2xFY2026 12.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.52FY2026 $3.82FY2026 $2.68FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +18.6%FY2026 +38.9%FY2026 +5.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +19.9% +14.7% +18.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $127.79BFY2026 $52.09BFY2026 $27.20BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.0%FY2026 +8.9%FY2026 -1.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -2.4% +12.6% +3.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBACUBSING
Held by institutions 75.0% 40.4% 4.5%
Institutions holding 3,612 762 589
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.7% +10.4% -19.0%
Institutions buying 1,825 427 319
Institutions selling 1,342 218 154
Buyers to sellers 1.36 1.96 2.07

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BACUBSING
BAC 1.00 0.50 0.50
UBS 0.50 1.00 0.66
ING 0.50 0.66 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BAC, UBS and ING?

Bank Of America (BAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Bank Of America (BAC) $362.82B, UBS Group AG (UBS) $147.91B, Ing Groep (ING) $97.33B.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ing Groep (ING) returned the most: Bank Of America (BAC) -3.9%, UBS Group AG (UBS) +22.2%, Ing Groep (ING) +34.9%. Over five years, UBS Group AG (UBS) compounded fastest (Bank Of America (BAC) +1.4%/yr, UBS Group AG (UBS) +20.8%/yr, Ing Groep (ING) +16.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Bank Of America (BAC) 0.03%, UBS Group AG (UBS) 0.00%, Ing Groep (ING) 0.00%. UBS Group AG (UBS) and Ing Groep (ING) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Bank Of America (BAC) has been the steadiest (Bank Of America (BAC) 21.9%, UBS Group AG (UBS) 27.0%, Ing Groep (ING) 27.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BAC, UBS and ING?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bank Of America (BAC) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.