BA vs RKLB vs HWM Stock Comparison

Boeing, Rocket Lab and Howmet Aerospace Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BA Boeing Co
$172.72 -8.0% 1M -19.1% 1Y
Market cap
$135.84B
P/E
18.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$94.91B
Div. yield
–
Commercial Aerospace Industrials
2 wins
RKLB Rocket Lab Corp
$59.10 -15.2% 1M -10.7% 1Y
Market cap
$34.31B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$769.15M
Div. yield
–
Space Industrials
1 win
HWM Howmet Aerospace Inc.
$205.71 -10.9% 1M +1.1% 1Y
Market cap
$79.38B
P/E
38.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.73B
Div. yield
0.00%
Commercial Aerospace Industrials
7 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Howmet Aerospace leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Howmet Aerospace 7, Boeing 2, Rocket Lab 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionBARKLBHWMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $135.84B $34.31B $79.38B BA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.6x -207.3x 38.7x BA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 39.6x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +17.5% +52.5% +22.0% RKLB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.7% -21.5% 21.1% HWM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 18.2% -6.7% 21.5% HWM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.1x 14.4x 1.4x HWM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -19.1% -10.7% +1.1% HWM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -3.6%/yr +33.3%/yr +47.3%/yr HWM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.1% 92.8% 35.5% HWM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 42/100 73/100 HWM

Percentile Scorecard

BARKLBHWM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisBARKLBHWM
Valuation 64 #37 of 100 16 #84 of 100 40 #60 of 100
Growth 83 #17 of 96 50 #49 of 96 90 #11 of 96
Profitability 64 #35 of 95 31 #66 of 95 99 #2 of 95
Financial Health 12 #93 of 105 89 #13 of 105 47 #56 of 105
Shareholder Returns – 23 #50 of 65 88 #9 of 65
Overall 56 42 73
  • BA ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • RKLB ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense
  • HWM ranked among 107 companies in Aerospace and Defense

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodBARKLBHWMSPY
1 month -8.0%-15.2%-10.9% +0.7%
3 months -21.8%-8.6%-25.8% +3.7%
6 months -24.6%-28.4%-15.4% +7.1%
Year to date -20.4%-15.3%+0.3% +12.8%
1 year -19.1%-10.7%+1.1% +11.9%
3 years -5.3%+1,307.1%+371.8% +85.2%
3 years, per year -1.8%+141.6%+67.8% +22.8%
5 years -16.6%+320.6%+592.9% +67.6%
5 years, per year -3.6%+33.3%+47.3% +10.9%
10 years +20.8%—— +262.0%
10 years, per year +1.9%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureBARKLBHWMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.1%92.8%35.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 36.0%90.5%36.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.173.911.09 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.53-0.110.03 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -50.3%-78.3%-36.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -31.5%-60.7%-29.7% -1.2%
52-week high $252.15$150.23$292.71 $779.14
52-week low $167.12$39.48$185.88 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleBARKLBHWM
P/E now vs peer median 18.7xmedian 26.9x -224.9xmedian 26.9x 39.9xmedian 26.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 3.0x 46.0xmedian 3.0x 8.4xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.5xmedian 15.0x -207.3xmedian 15.0x 28.2xmedian 15.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 8,554xmedian 27.2x -95.3xmedian 27.2x 42.4xmedian 27.2x
P/B now vs peer median 20.9xmedian 2.5x 10.1xmedian 2.5x 14.2xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.32median 0.93 -27.19median 0.93 0.81median 0.93

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsBARKLBHWM
Revenue $94.91B $769.15M $9.73B
Gross profit $8.94B $286.62M $3.56B
Operating income $9.74B -$223.49M $2.73B
Net income $7.66B -$165.46M $2.05B
Free cash flow $16.00M -$371.14M $1.93B
R&D $3.62B $312.42M $38.00M
EPS (diluted) $9.22 $-0.26 $5.13
Cash & equivalents $9.50B $2.13B $507.00M
Total debt $45.92B $1.72M $4.83B
Shares (diluted) 792.90M 629.68M 400.00M
Enterprise value $44.80B $28.63B $75.14B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricBARKLBHWM
P/E 18.7x -224.9x 39.9x
P/FCF 8,554x -95.3x 42.4x
P/Operating cash flow 34.1x -158.9x 34.1x
P/S 1.4x 46.0x 8.4x
P/B 20.9x 10.1x 14.2x
P/Tangible book 25.9x 11.1x 16.7x
EV/EBITDA 13.5x -207.3x 28.2x
EV/EBIT 16.6x -147.9x 31.6x
EV/Revenue 1.7x 43.0x 8.9x
EV/FCF 10,130x -89.1x 44.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 40.4x -148.6x 35.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.32 -27.19 0.81

Growth

14 metrics
MetricBARKLBHWM
Revenue growth (1Y) 17.5% 52.5% 22.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.8% 49.2% 14.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 906.6% 95.7% 33.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 9.1% 109.3% 26.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 217.8% -0.5% 36.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 107.6% -11.7% 35.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 177.7% 28.5% 41.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 67.1% -0.4% 47.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 168.9% 41.5% 43.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 58.4% 8.3% 49.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 208.0% -100.8% 40.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -12.7% -44.7% 38.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 100.3% -81.9% 50.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -84.9% -45.7% 41.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricBARKLBHWM
Gross margin 9.4% 37.3% 36.6%
EBITDA margin 12.7% -20.7% 31.4%
Operating margin 10.3% -29.1% 28.1%
Pretax margin 8.3% -24.9% 25.8%
Net margin 7.7% -21.5% 21.1%
FCF margin 0.0% -48.3% 19.8%
Operating cash flow margin 4.2% -28.9% 24.7%
Return on equity 121.0% -5.7% 35.7%
Return on assets 4.6% -4.7% 15.5%
Return on invested capital 18.2% -6.7% 21.5%
Return on capital employed 17.9% -7.5% 24.7%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.2x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.5x 1.3x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 10.6% 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricBARKLBHWM
Debt / assets 26.9% 0.0% 36.4%
Debt / equity 7.0x 0.0x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.1x 14.4x 1.4x
Debt / FCF 2,870x 0.0x 2.5x
Liabilities / assets 96.2% 16.6% 56.6%
Equity / assets 3.8% 83.4% 43.4%
Interest coverage 4.0x -13.9x –
Current ratio 1.1x 5.5x 1.9x
Quick ratio 0.3x 4.8x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.2x 4.4x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 1.49 30.83 8.71

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricBARKLBHWM
Dividend yield – – 0.2%
Net buyback yield – -6.5% 1.6%
Shareholder yield 0.0% -6.5% 1.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 9.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 10.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 23.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 43.3%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusBARKLBHWM
Forward P/E – – 39.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.99FY2026 $-0.28FY2026 $5.19FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -183.2%FY2026 – +37.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +31.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $91.05BFY2026 $918.00MFY2026 $10.37BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +1.8%FY2026 +52.5%FY2026 +25.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +18.5% +51.6% +15.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersBARKLBHWM
Held by institutions 75.6% 51.2% 91.0%
Institutions holding 2,628 1,129 1,601
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.3% +10.9% +0.7%
Institutions buying 1,328 810 908
Institutions selling 844 239 484
Buyers to sellers 1.57 3.39 1.88

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

BARKLBHWM
BA 1.00 0.27 0.40
RKLB 0.27 1.00 0.22
HWM 0.40 0.22 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, BA, RKLB and HWM?

Boeing (BA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Boeing (BA) $135.84B, Rocket Lab (RKLB) $34.31B, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) $79.38B.

Which stock is cheaper, BA, RKLB and HWM?

Boeing (BA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Boeing (BA) 18.6x, Rocket Lab (RKLB) -207.3x, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) 38.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Rocket Lab (RKLB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Boeing (BA) +17.5%, Rocket Lab (RKLB) +52.5%, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) +22.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Howmet Aerospace (HWM) has the highest net margin (Boeing (BA) 7.7%, Rocket Lab (RKLB) -21.5%, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) 21.1%). On return on invested capital, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) leads (Boeing (BA) 18.2%, Rocket Lab (RKLB) -6.7%, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) 21.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Howmet Aerospace (HWM) returned the most: Boeing (BA) -19.1%, Rocket Lab (RKLB) -10.7%, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) +1.1%. Over five years, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) compounded fastest (Boeing (BA) -3.6%/yr, Rocket Lab (RKLB) +33.3%/yr, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) +47.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Boeing (BA) 0.00%, Rocket Lab (RKLB) 0.00%, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) 0.00%. Boeing (BA) and Rocket Lab (RKLB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) has been the steadiest (Boeing (BA) 36.1%, Rocket Lab (RKLB) 92.8%, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) 35.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, BA, RKLB and HWM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Howmet Aerospace (HWM) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.