AZZ vs HLP vs CSTM Stock Comparison

Azz, Hongli and Constellium Se Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AZZ Azz Inc
$137.17 +0.1% 1M +38.9% 1Y
Market cap
$4.10B
P/E
24.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.75B
Div. yield
0.64%
Metal Fabrication Industrials
4 wins
HLP Hongli Group Inc.
$3.64 +64.7% 1M +149.3% 1Y
Market cap
$267.32M
P/E
137.6x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Metal Fabrication Industrials
1 win
CSTM Constellium Se
$24.54 -1.5% 1M +45.6% 1Y
Market cap
$3.33B
P/E
6.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.58B
Div. yield
–
Metal Fabrication Industrials
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Constellium Se leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Constellium Se 6, Azz 4, Hongli 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAZZHLPCSTMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.10B $267.32M $3.33B AZZ
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 24.6x 137.6x 6.1x CSTM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 18.6x — 5.9x CSTM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.5% — +25.9% CSTM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.6% — 5.7% AZZ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 11.4% — 25.6% CSTM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.2x — 1.2x CSTM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.64% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +38.9% +149.3% +45.6% HLP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +20.9%/yr — +5.2%/yr AZZ
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.1% 118.6% 44.8% AZZ
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 — 74/100 CSTM

Percentile Scorecard

AZZHLPCSTM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAZZHLPCSTM
Valuation 73 #55 of 203 10 #183 of 203 97 #8 of 203
Growth 62 #72 of 188 – 97 #6 of 188
Profitability 72 #52 of 183 – 65 #64 of 183
Financial Health 56 #97 of 217 55 #99 of 217 19 #176 of 217
Shareholder Returns 24 #117 of 153 – 90 #16 of 153
Overall 57 – 74
  • AZZ ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • HLP ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • CSTM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAZZHLPCSTMSPY
1 month +0.1%+64.7%-1.5% -0.2%
3 months -6.3%+184.4%-15.6% +3.9%
6 months -3.1%+343.9%-21.0% +8.2%
Year to date +28.0%+250.0%+30.2% +12.9%
1 year +38.9%+149.3%+45.6% +12.3%
3 years +195.2%+64.0%+60.2% +87.4%
3 years, per year +43.5%+17.9%+17.0% +23.3%
5 years +158.7%—+28.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year +20.9%—+5.2% +10.9%
10 years +158.1%—+371.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year +9.9%—+16.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureAZZHLPCSTMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.1%118.6%44.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.2%130.9%42.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.180.071.94 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.211.261.02 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -46.8%-91.9%-66.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.4%0.0%-32.1% -1.2%
52-week high $160.17$3.64$36.15 $779.14
52-week low $97.64$0.43$14.75 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAZZHLPCSTM
P/E now vs peer median 24.6xmedian 25.2x 137.6xmedian 25.2x 6.1xmedian 25.2x
P/S now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 1.9x 13.6xmedian 1.9x 0.3xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 12.0xmedian 14.0x —median 14.0x 3.4xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 19.1xmedian 21.7x -609.0xmedian 21.7x 15.3xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 2.3x 4.6xmedian 2.3x 2.7xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.28median 1.32 —median 1.32 0.07median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAZZHLPCSTM
Revenue $1.75B – $9.58B
Gross profit $423.83M – $1.56B
Operating income $287.42M – $1.14B
Net income $167.46M – $545.00M
Free cash flow $214.45M – $218.00M
R&D – – $53.00M
EPS (diluted) $5.56 – $3.89
Cash & equivalents $1.95M $1.81M $163.00M
Total debt $468.47M $47.35M $1.92B
Shares (diluted) 30.12M 73.44M 140.15M
Enterprise value $4.10B $262.74M $2.79B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAZZHLPCSTM
P/E 24.6x 137.6x 6.1x
P/FCF 19.1x -609.0x 15.3x
P/Operating cash flow 14.0x – 6.0x
P/S 2.4x 13.6x 0.3x
P/B 2.9x 4.6x 2.7x
P/Tangible book 4.1x 5.0x 2.8x
EV/EBITDA 12.0x – 3.4x
EV/EBIT 15.9x – 4.4x
EV/Revenue 2.6x – 0.5x
EV/FCF 21.3x – 23.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.6x – 9.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.28 – 0.07

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAZZHLPCSTM
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.5% – 25.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.2% – 6.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.0% – 66.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 8.9% – 21.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 21.3% – 101.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 11.4% – 27.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -46.7% – 1,457%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 99.0% – 19.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -46.5% – 1,629%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 87.1% – 85.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -42.0% – 84.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 20.3% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -47.3% – 311.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 35.3% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAZZHLPCSTM
Gross margin 24.3% – 16.3%
EBITDA margin 21.8% – 15.5%
Operating margin 16.5% – 11.9%
Pretax margin 12.9% – 8.1%
Net margin 9.6% – 5.7%
FCF margin 12.3% – 2.3%
Operating cash flow margin 16.7% – 5.8%
Return on equity 12.0% – 45.7%
Return on assets 7.3% – 9.1%
Return on invested capital 11.4% – 25.6%
Return on capital employed 14.1% – 31.2%
Asset turnover 0.8x – 1.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x – 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAZZHLPCSTM
Debt / assets 20.0% 16.0% 31.7%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.2x 1.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.2x – 1.2x
Debt / FCF 2.2x – 8.8x
Liabilities / assets 39.5% 19.9% 79.3%
Equity / assets 60.5% 80.1% 20.7%
Interest coverage 6.3x – 10.5x
Current ratio 1.8x 1.1x 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.8x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.1x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 4.51 – 2.96

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAZZHLPCSTM
Dividend yield 0.6% – –
Net buyback yield – – 3.4%
Shareholder yield 0.6% – 3.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAZZHLPCSTM
Forward P/E 18.6xFY2026 – 5.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $7.37FY2026 – $4.18FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +19.1%FY2026 – +237.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.1% – -32.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.97BFY2026 – $10.71BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +19.4%FY2026 – +26.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -8.1% – +1.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAZZHLPCSTM
Held by institutions 94.6% – 88.6%
Institutions holding 364 – 384
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.1% – -4.5%
Institutions buying 196 – 255
Institutions selling 119 – 108
Buyers to sellers 1.65 – 2.36

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AZZHLPCSTM
AZZ 1.00 -0.10 0.44
HLP -0.10 1.00 -0.05
CSTM 0.44 -0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AZZ, HLP and CSTM?

Azz (AZZ) is the largest by market capitalisation: Azz (AZZ) $4.10B, Hongli (HLP) $267.32M, Constellium Se (CSTM) $3.33B.

Which stock is cheaper, AZZ, HLP and CSTM?

Constellium Se (CSTM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Azz (AZZ) 24.6x, Hongli (HLP) 137.6x, Constellium Se (CSTM) 6.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Constellium Se (CSTM) is cheapest (Azz (AZZ) 18.6x, Constellium Se (CSTM) 5.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Constellium Se (CSTM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Azz (AZZ) +9.5%, Constellium Se (CSTM) +25.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Azz (AZZ) has the highest net margin (Azz (AZZ) 9.6%, Constellium Se (CSTM) 5.7%). On return on invested capital, Constellium Se (CSTM) leads (Azz (AZZ) 11.4%, Constellium Se (CSTM) 25.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Hongli (HLP) returned the most: Azz (AZZ) +38.9%, Hongli (HLP) +149.3%, Constellium Se (CSTM) +45.6%. Over five years, Azz (AZZ) compounded fastest (Azz (AZZ) +20.9%/yr, Constellium Se (CSTM) +5.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Azz (AZZ) 0.64%. Hongli (HLP) and Constellium Se (CSTM) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Azz (AZZ) has been the steadiest (Azz (AZZ) 32.1%, Hongli (HLP) 118.6%, Constellium Se (CSTM) 44.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AZZ, HLP and CSTM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Constellium Se (CSTM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.