AWCA vs FOR vs MLP Stock Comparison

Awaysis Capital, Forestar and Maui Land & Pineapple Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AWCA Awaysis Capital, Inc.
$0.03 -25.0% 1M -87.5% 1Y
Market cap
$12.28M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.34M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
2 wins
FOR Forestar Group Inc.
$26.00 -1.9% 1M -1.0% 1Y
Market cap
$1.34B
P/E
7.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.72B
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
5 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Forestar leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Forestar 5, Awaysis Capital 2, Maui Land & Pineapple 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAWCAFORMLPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $12.28M $1.34B $282.78M FOR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -4.8x 7.9x -61.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 8.5x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +371.3% +11.8% -4.1% AWCA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -190.5% 9.9% -28.6% FOR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 6.1% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -3.6x 1.8x — AWCA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -87.5% -1.0% -13.0% FOR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -13.0%/yr +5.8%/yr +6.0%/yr MLP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 342.8% 33.7% 35.5% FOR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 27/100 55/100 34/100 FOR

Percentile Scorecard

AWCAFORMLP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAWCAFORMLP
Valuation 5 #37 of 39 92 #4 of 39 8 #36 of 39
Growth 81 #7 of 33 53 #16 of 33 47 #18 of 33
Profitability 7 #28 of 30 62 #12 of 30 24 #23 of 30
Financial Health 16 #32 of 38 46 #21 of 38 57 #17 of 38
Shareholder Returns – 23 #11 of 14 –
Overall 27 55 34
  • AWCA ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • FOR ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • MLP ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAWCAFORMLPSPY
1 month -25.0%-1.9%-13.5% -0.8%
3 months 0.0%-10.0%-19.3% +3.5%
6 months -57.1%-8.3%-9.6% +7.0%
Year to date -75.0%+5.6%-17.6% +12.2%
1 year -87.5%-1.0%-13.0% +13.0%
3 years -93.3%+11.2%-5.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year -59.5%+3.6%-2.0% +23.1%
5 years -50.0%+32.3%+34.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year -13.0%+5.8%+6.0% +11.0%
10 years -50.0%+134.4%+112.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year -6.7%+8.9%+7.8% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureAWCAFORMLPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 342.8%33.7%35.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 663.2%31.9%32.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.660.820.29 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.26-0.03-0.37 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -98.7%-54.7%-46.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -87.5%-18.7%-29.9% -1.8%
52-week high $0.24$31.98$19.92 $779.14
52-week low $0.02$23.09$13.96 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAWCAFORMLP
P/E now vs peer median -4.8xmedian 7.8x 7.8xmedian 7.8x -60.0xmedian 7.8x
P/S now vs peer median 9.2xmedian 4.9x 0.8xmedian 4.9x 17.2xmedian 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -8.7xmedian 11.2x 8.0xmedian 11.2x —median 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -40.3xmedian 6.4x 4.7xmedian 6.4x -33.9xmedian 6.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 0.6x 0.7xmedian 0.6x 8.9xmedian 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median -0.14median 0.33 1.67median 0.33 -2.42median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAWCAFORMLP
Revenue $1.34M $1.72B $16.15M
Gross profit $576.01K $368.90M $9.37M
Operating income -$2.58M $213.60M -$5.87M
Net income -$2.55M $170.50M -$5.87M
Free cash flow -$304.62K $282.90M -$8.19M
EPS (diluted) $-0.01 $3.32 $-0.23
Cash & equivalents $1.13M $394.90M $3.28M
Total debt $30.64M $793.80M $8.50M
Shares (diluted) 409.07M 51.30M 20.40M
Enterprise value $10.78M -$4.81M $265.31M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAWCAFORMLP
P/E -4.8x 7.8x -60.0x
P/FCF -40.3x 4.7x -33.9x
P/Operating cash flow -42.9x 4.7x 779.4x
P/S 9.2x 0.8x 17.2x
P/B 1.9x 0.7x 8.9x
P/Tangible book 1.9x 0.7x 8.9x
EV/EBITDA -8.7x 8.0x –
EV/EBIT -8.2x 8.1x -48.2x
EV/Revenue 15.8x 1.0x 17.5x
EV/FCF -69.3x 6.1x -34.5x
EV/Operating cash flow -73.7x 6.1x 794.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.14 1.67 -2.42

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAWCAFORMLP
Revenue growth (1Y) 371.3% 11.8% -4.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 49.5% 10.8% 19.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.7% 6.7% 17.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 9.9% 9.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 2.0% 5.7% 10.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 12.9% 5.4% -21.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 7.2% 4.9% 10.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 13.2% 5.5% 18.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.9% 4.1% 67.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 33.6% 4.7% 24.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 93.1% 184.8% 78.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 28.2% 3.6% 27.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 94.1% 183.9% -94.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 28.4% 3.7% -9.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAWCAFORMLP
Gross margin 43.0% 21.4% 58.0%
EBITDA margin -181.2% 12.6% –
Operating margin -192.5% 12.4% -36.3%
Pretax margin -190.5% 13.1% -36.3%
Net margin -190.5% 9.9% -28.6%
FCF margin -22.8% 16.4% -50.7%
Operating cash flow margin -21.4% 16.5% 2.2%
Return on equity -37.9% 9.3% -18.6%
Return on assets -14.4% 5.3% -12.0%
Return on invested capital – 6.1% –
Return on capital employed -37.5% – -13.9%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.5x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.1x 1.7x -0.1x
Stock comp / revenue 208.6% 0.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAWCAFORMLP
Debt / assets 54.7% 24.6% 17.1%
Debt / equity 1.5x 0.4x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA -3.6x 1.8x –
Debt / FCF -32.7x 2.8x -1.0x
Liabilities / assets 64.6% 42.3% 37.4%
Equity / assets 35.4% 57.7% 62.6%
Interest coverage -135.0x – –
Current ratio 1.2x – 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.1x – 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.1x – 0.5x
Altman Z-score -0.95 – 6.81

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAWCAFORMLP
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 0.0% –
Shareholder yield – 0.0% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAWCAFORMLP
Forward P/E – 8.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $3.06FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – -7.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – -12.4% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.77BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +6.9%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +1.0% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAWCAFORMLP
Held by institutions – 36.6% 23.5%
Institutions holding – 185 66
Change in shares held, QoQ – +0.1% +28.9%
Institutions buying – 97 23
Institutions selling – 49 26
Buyers to sellers – 1.98 0.88

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AWCAFORMLP
AWCA 1.00 0.06 0.04
FOR 0.06 1.00 0.23
MLP 0.04 0.23 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AWCA, FOR and MLP?

Forestar (FOR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Awaysis Capital (AWCA) $12.28M, Forestar (FOR) $1.34B, Maui Land & Pineapple (MLP) $282.78M.

Which company is growing faster?

Awaysis Capital (AWCA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Awaysis Capital (AWCA) +371.3%, Forestar (FOR) +11.8%, Maui Land & Pineapple (MLP) -4.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Forestar (FOR) has the highest net margin (Awaysis Capital (AWCA) -190.5%, Forestar (FOR) 9.9%, Maui Land & Pineapple (MLP) -28.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Forestar (FOR) returned the most: Awaysis Capital (AWCA) -87.5%, Forestar (FOR) -1.0%, Maui Land & Pineapple (MLP) -13.0%. Over five years, Maui Land & Pineapple (MLP) compounded fastest (Awaysis Capital (AWCA) -13.0%/yr, Forestar (FOR) +5.8%/yr, Maui Land & Pineapple (MLP) +6.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Forestar (FOR) has been the steadiest (Awaysis Capital (AWCA) 342.8%, Forestar (FOR) 33.7%, Maui Land & Pineapple (MLP) 35.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AWCA, FOR and MLP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Forestar (FOR) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.