AWCA vs FOR vs FPH Stock Comparison

Awaysis Capital, Forestar and Five Point Holdings Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
AWCA Awaysis Capital, Inc.
$0.03 -25.0% 1M -87.5% 1Y
Market cap
$12.28M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.34M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
2 wins
FOR Forestar Group Inc.
$26.00 -1.9% 1M -1.0% 1Y
Market cap
$1.33B
P/E
7.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.72B
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
6 wins
FPH Five Point Holdings, LLC
$4.16 -12.6% 1M -32.4% 1Y
Market cap
$315.05M
P/E
10.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$118.00M
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Development Real Estate
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Forestar leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Forestar 6, Five Point Holdings 3, Awaysis Capital 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionAWCAFORFPHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $12.28M $1.33B $315.05M FOR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -4.8x 7.8x 10.7x FOR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 8.5x 3.8x FPH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +371.3% +11.8% -39.1% AWCA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -190.5% 9.9% 24.9% FPH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 6.1% -4.0% FOR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -3.6x 1.8x -0.7x AWCA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -87.5% -1.0% -32.4% FOR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -13.0%/yr +5.8%/yr -11.1%/yr FOR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 342.8% 33.7% 29.2% FPH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 27/100 55/100 52/100 FOR

Percentile Scorecard

AWCAFORFPH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisAWCAFORFPH
Valuation 5 #37 of 39 92 #4 of 39 63 #15 of 39
Growth 81 #7 of 33 53 #16 of 33 28 #24 of 33
Profitability 7 #28 of 30 62 #12 of 30 41 #18 of 30
Financial Health 16 #32 of 38 46 #21 of 38 76 #10 of 38
Shareholder Returns – 23 #11 of 14 –
Overall 27 55 52
  • AWCA ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • FOR ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • FPH ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodAWCAFORFPHSPY
1 month -25.0%-1.9%-12.6% -0.8%
3 months 0.0%-10.0%-22.2% +3.5%
6 months -57.1%-8.3%-16.6% +7.0%
Year to date -75.0%+5.6%-25.6% +12.2%
1 year -87.5%-1.0%-32.4% +13.0%
3 years -93.3%+11.2%+93.5% +86.3%
3 years, per year -59.5%+3.6%+24.6% +23.1%
5 years -50.0%+32.3%-44.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year -13.0%+5.8%-11.1% +11.0%
10 years -50.0%+134.4%— +258.0%
10 years, per year -6.7%+8.9%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureAWCAFORFPHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 342.8%33.7%29.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 663.2%31.9%30.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.660.820.55 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.26-0.03-1.11 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -98.7%-54.7%-74.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -87.5%-18.7%-34.0% -1.8%
52-week high $0.24$31.98$6.30 $779.14
52-week low $0.02$23.09$4.16 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleAWCAFORFPH
P/E now vs peer median -4.8xmedian 7.8x 7.8xmedian 7.8x 10.8xmedian 7.8x
P/S now vs peer median 9.2xmedian 4.9x 0.8xmedian 4.9x 5.2xmedian 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -8.7xmedian 11.2x 8.0xmedian 11.2x -5.7xmedian 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -40.3xmedian 6.4x 4.7xmedian 6.4x 102.5xmedian 6.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 0.6x 0.7xmedian 0.6x 0.3xmedian 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median -0.14median 0.33 1.67median 0.33 0.33median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsAWCAFORFPH
Revenue $1.34M $1.72B $118.00M
Gross profit $576.01K $368.90M -$10.11M
Operating income -$2.58M $213.60M -$131.54M
Net income -$2.55M $170.50M $79.23M
Free cash flow -$304.62K $282.90M $6.01M
EPS (diluted) $-0.01 $3.32 $0.39
Cash & equivalents $1.13M $394.90M $358.72M
Total debt $30.64M $793.80M $444.40M
Shares (diluted) 409.07M 51.30M 76.10M
Enterprise value $10.78M -$17.07M -$1.15B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricAWCAFORFPH
P/E -4.8x 7.8x 10.8x
P/FCF -40.3x 4.7x 102.5x
P/Operating cash flow -42.9x 4.7x 97.0x
P/S 9.2x 0.8x 5.2x
P/B 1.9x 0.7x 0.3x
P/Tangible book 1.9x 0.7x 0.3x
EV/EBITDA -8.7x 8.0x -5.7x
EV/EBIT -8.2x 8.1x -5.3x
EV/Revenue 15.8x 1.0x 5.9x
EV/FCF -69.3x 6.1x 116.7x
EV/Operating cash flow -73.7x 6.1x 110.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.14 1.67 0.33

Growth

14 metrics
MetricAWCAFORFPH
Revenue growth (1Y) 371.3% 11.8% -39.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 49.5% 10.8% 2.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.7% 6.7% 90.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 9.9% 53.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 2.0% 5.7% 51.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 12.9% 5.4% 15.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 7.2% 4.9% -67.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 13.2% 5.5% 0.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.9% 4.1% -6.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 33.6% 4.7% 32.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 93.1% 184.8% -97.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 28.2% 3.6% -50.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 94.1% 183.9% -97.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 28.4% 3.7% -51.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricAWCAFORFPH
Gross margin 43.0% 21.4% -8.6%
EBITDA margin -181.2% 12.6% -103.9%
Operating margin -192.5% 12.4% -111.5%
Pretax margin -190.5% 13.1% 79.1%
Net margin -190.5% 9.9% 24.9%
FCF margin -22.8% 16.4% 5.1%
Operating cash flow margin -21.4% 16.5% 5.4%
Return on equity -37.9% 9.3% 3.4%
Return on assets -14.4% 5.3% 2.5%
Return on invested capital – 6.1% -4.0%
Return on capital employed -37.5% – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.5x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.1x 1.7x 0.1x
Stock comp / revenue 208.6% 0.5% 7.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricAWCAFORFPH
Debt / assets 54.7% 24.6% 13.8%
Debt / equity 1.5x 0.4x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -3.6x 1.8x -0.7x
Debt / FCF -32.7x 2.8x 73.9x
Liabilities / assets 64.6% 42.3% 27.7%
Equity / assets 35.4% 57.7% 72.3%
Interest coverage -135.0x – –
Current ratio 1.2x – –
Quick ratio 0.1x – –
Cash ratio 0.1x – –
Altman Z-score -0.95 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricAWCAFORFPH
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 0.0% –
Shareholder yield – 0.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusAWCAFORFPH
Forward P/E – 8.5xFY2026 3.8xFY2023
EPS, next fiscal year – $3.06FY2026 $1.09FY2023
EPS growth, next FY – -7.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – -12.4% -37.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.77BFY2026 $559.28MFY2023
Revenue growth, next FY – +6.9%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +1.0% -42.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersAWCAFORFPH
Held by institutions – 36.6% 25.2%
Institutions holding – 185 88
Change in shares held, QoQ – +0.1% +0.3%
Institutions buying – 97 37
Institutions selling – 49 28
Buyers to sellers – 1.98 1.32

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

AWCAFORFPH
AWCA 1.00 0.06 0.08
FOR 0.06 1.00 0.43
FPH 0.08 0.43 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, AWCA, FOR and FPH?

Forestar (FOR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Awaysis Capital (AWCA) $12.28M, Forestar (FOR) $1.33B, Five Point Holdings (FPH) $315.05M.

Which stock is cheaper, AWCA, FOR and FPH?

Forestar (FOR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Awaysis Capital (AWCA) -4.8x, Forestar (FOR) 7.8x, Five Point Holdings (FPH) 10.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Five Point Holdings (FPH) is cheapest (Forestar (FOR) 8.5x, Five Point Holdings (FPH) 3.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Awaysis Capital (AWCA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Awaysis Capital (AWCA) +371.3%, Forestar (FOR) +11.8%, Five Point Holdings (FPH) -39.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Five Point Holdings (FPH) has the highest net margin (Awaysis Capital (AWCA) -190.5%, Forestar (FOR) 9.9%, Five Point Holdings (FPH) 24.9%). On return on invested capital, Forestar (FOR) leads (Forestar (FOR) 6.1%, Five Point Holdings (FPH) -4.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Forestar (FOR) returned the most: Awaysis Capital (AWCA) -87.5%, Forestar (FOR) -1.0%, Five Point Holdings (FPH) -32.4%. Over five years, Forestar (FOR) compounded fastest (Awaysis Capital (AWCA) -13.0%/yr, Forestar (FOR) +5.8%/yr, Five Point Holdings (FPH) -11.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Five Point Holdings (FPH) has been the steadiest (Awaysis Capital (AWCA) 342.8%, Forestar (FOR) 33.7%, Five Point Holdings (FPH) 29.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, AWCA, FOR and FPH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Forestar (FOR) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.